在C ++中以与对象创建相反的顺序调用析构函数,但我不明白为什么不为对象数组维护它。
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class test {
int nmbr;
static int c;
public:
test(int j)
{
cout<<"constructor is called for object no :"<<j<<endl;
nmbr=j;
};
~test()
{
c++;
cout<<"destructor is called for object no :"<<c<<endl;
};
};
int test::c=0;
int main()
{
test ob[]={test(1),test(2),test(3)};
return 0;
}
上述程序输出
constructor is called for object no :1
constructor is called for object no :2
constructor is called for object no :3
destructor is called for object no :1
destructor is called for object no :2
destructor is called for object no :3
但是为什么没有以相反的顺序调用析构函数?
答案 0 :(得分:6)
以相反的顺序调用它。你正在打印变量c。看看我在这个节目中的评论 - &#34;我在这里改变了#34;。您正在打印一个计数变量,您应该打印正在销毁的对象。
您可以在这里阅读更多内容: https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/dtors#order-dtors-for-arrays
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class test {
int nmbr;
static int c;
public:
test(int j)
{
cout<<"constructor is called for object no :"<<j<<endl;
nmbr=j;
};
~test()
{
c++;
// I changed here
cout<<"destructor is called for object no :"<<nmbr<<endl;
};
};
int test::c=0;
int main()
{
test ob[]={test(1),test(2),test(3)};
return 0;
}
答案 1 :(得分:2)
他们是,你的测试错误。在调用析构函数时,您正在访问自己设置的数字。更改析构函数输出以显示类中的实际值,您将自己看到
cout<<"destructor is called for object no :"<<nmbr<<endl;
答案 2 :(得分:1)
以构造函数调用的相反顺序调用析构函数。
您的测试是错误地生成和打印值。
尝试使用此代码,您将看到预期的结果。
#include <iostream>
class test {
int this_instance;
static int number_of_instances;
public:
test() : this_instance(number_of_instances++)
{
std::cout << "constructor invoked for object :"<< this_instance << '\n';
};
~test()
{
std::cout << "destructor invoked for object :" << this_instance << '\n';
};
};
int test::number_of_instances = 0;
int main()
{
test first_batch[4];
return 0;
}