这是我迄今为止所做的尝试:
implicit val doubleEq = TolerantNumerics.tolerantDoubleEquality(0.1)
implicit val listEq = new Equivalence[List[Double]] {
override def areEquivalent(a: List[Double], b: List[Double]): Boolean = {
(a, b) match {
case (Nil, Nil) => true
case (x :: xs, y :: ys) => x === y && areEquivalent(xs, ys)
case _ => false
}
}
}
第一个断言成功但第二个断言失败:
assert(1.0 === 1.01)
assert(List(1.0) === List(1.01))
有没有办法让集合使用我为其元素定义的含义?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
就我而言,我重新定义了areEqual
方法,提供new Equality[List[Double]]
这是Equivalence[List[Double]]
的子类,考虑到areEqual
将Any
作为第二个implicit val listEq = new Equality[List[Double]] {
def areEqual(a: List[Double], b: Any): Boolean = {
def areEqualRec(a: List[Double], b: List[Double]): Boolean = {
(a, b) match {
case (Nil, Nil) => true
case (x :: xs, y :: ys) => x === y && areEquivalent(xs, ys)
case _ => false
}
}
b match {
case daList: List[Double] => areEqualRec(a, daList)
case _ => false
}
}
}
类型参数。
$('#val1').val()
答案 1 :(得分:1)
Equality
类仅在导入TypeCheckedTripleEquals
时使用:
提供返回Boolean的===和!==运算符,将相等性确定委托给Equality类型类,并要求比较两个值的类型为子类型/超类型关系。
这是我用来解决这个问题的基础测试类:
import org.scalactic.{Equivalence, TolerantNumerics, TypeCheckedTripleEquals}
import org.scalatest.FunSuite
abstract class UnitSpec extends FunSuite with TypeCheckedTripleEquals {
implicit val doubleEq = TolerantNumerics.tolerantDoubleEquality(0.001)
implicit val listEq = new Equivalence[List[Double]] {
override def areEquivalent(a: List[Double], b: List[Double]): Boolean = {
(a, b) match {
case (Nil, Nil) => true
case (x :: xs, y :: ys) => x === y && areEquivalent(xs, ys)
case _ => false
}
}
}
}