我正在使用PostgreSQL 9.4。
我有一张workouts
的表格。用户可以为每个results
创建多个workout
,result
有score
。
给定一个workout_ids列表和两个user_id,我想为每个用户返回每个锻炼的最佳分数。如果用户没有该锻炼的结果,我想返回填充/ null结果。
SELECT "results".*, "workouts".*
FROM "results" LEFT JOIN "workouts" ON "workouts"."id" = "results"."workout_id"
WHERE (
(user_id, workout_id, score) IN
(SELECT user_id, workout_id, MAX(score)
FROM results WHERE user_id IN (1, 2) AND workout_id IN (1, 2, 3)
GROUP BY user_id, workout_id)
)
在此查询中,左连接充当内连接;如果用户没有得到锻炼结果,我没有得到任何填充。无论存在多少结果,此查询应始终返回六行。
示例数据:
results
user_id | workout_id | score
-----------------------------
1 | 1 | 10
1 | 3 | 10
1 | 3 | 15
2 | 1 | 5
Desired result:
results.user_id | results.workout_id | max(results.score) | workouts.name
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 | 1 | 10 | Squat
1 | 2 | null | Bench
1 | 3 | 15 | Deadlift
2 | 1 | 5 | Squat
2 | 2 | null | Bench
2 | 3 | null | Deadlift
答案 0 :(得分:4)
where过滤掉你的NULL值,这就是为什么结果不符合你的期望。
Joinint WHERE子句结果而不是过滤where子句结果。
SELECT "results".*, "workouts".*,"max_score".*
FROM "results"
LEFT JOIN "workouts" ON "workouts"."id" = "results"."workout_id"
LEFT JOIN (SELECT user_id, workout_id, MAX(score)
FROM results WHERE user_id IN (1, 2) AND workout_id IN (1, 2, 3)
GROUP BY user_id, workout_id) max_score ON workouts.workout_id=max_score.workout_id;
您需要更改SELECT以获取正确的列。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
如何使用distinct on
或row_number()
?
SELECT DISTINCT ON (r.user_id, r.workout_id) r.*, w.*
FROM "results" r LEFT JOIN
"workouts" w
ON "w."id" = r."workout_id"
WHERE r.user_id IN (1, 2) AND r.workout_id IN (1, 2, 3)
ORDER BY r.user_id, r.workout_id, score desc;
row_number()
等效项需要子查询:
SELECT rw.*
FROM (SELECT r.*, w.*,
row_number() over (partition by user_id, workout_id order by score desc) as seqnum
FROM "results" r LEFT JOIN
"workouts" w
ON "w."id" = r."workout_id"
WHERE r.user_id IN (1, 2) AND r.workout_id IN (1, 2, 3)
) rw
WHERE seqnum = 1;
您应该比使用*
更明智地选择列。在重复列名称的情况下,子查询可能会返回错误。
编辑:
您需要先生成行,然后生成每个行的结果。这是一种基于第二个查询的方法:
SELECT u.user_id, w.workout_id, rw.score, rw.name
FROM (SELECT 1 as user_id UNION ALL SELECT 2) u CROSS JOIN
(SELECT 1 as workout_id UNION ALL SELECT 2 UNION ALL SELECT 3) w LEFT JOIN
(SELECT r.*, w.*,
row_number() over (partition by user_id, workout_id order by score desc) as seqnum
FROM "results" r LEFT JOIN
"workouts" w
ON "w."id" = r."workout_id"
WHERE r.user_id IN (1, 2) AND r.workout_id IN (1, 2, 3)
) rw
ON rw.user_id = u.user_id and rw.workout_id = w.workout_id and
rw.seqnum = 1;
答案 2 :(得分:1)
SELECT DISTINCT ON (1, 2)
u.user_id
, w.id AS workout_id
, r.score
, w.name AS workout_name
FROM workouts w
CROSS JOIN (VALUES (1), (2)) u(user_id)
LEFT JOIN results r ON r.workout_id = w.id
AND r.user_id = u.user_id
WHERE w.id IN (1, 2, 3)
ORDER BY 1, 2, r.score DESC NULLS LAST;
形成给定锻炼和用户的完整笛卡尔积。
假设给定的训练始终存在
假设并非所有给定用户都有针对所有给定锻炼的结果。
然后 LEFT JOIN
到results
。所有条件都进入ON
的{{1}}子句,而不是LEFT JOIN
子句,这将排除没有结果的WHERE
组合。详细说明:
最后使用(workout_id, user_id)
为(user_id, workout_id)
选择最佳结果。在此期间,产生所需的排序顺序
DISTINCT ON
的详细信息:
根据表的大小和数据分布,可能会有更快的解决方案:
如果您想要的是每个DISTINCT ON
组合的最大score
,则有简单的版本:
(user_id, workout_id)