我有使用boost锁定机制来保护的代码。 问题是RecomputeStuff不仅可以从RemoveStuff中调用,而且还可以从另一个线程调用。我的问题是,使用这些boost锁定机制,修复RecomputeStuff的正确方法是什么?它现在的方式是僵局。
#include <boost/thread.hpp>
boost::shared_mutex values_mutex;
int globaldata;
class A
{
public:
void RecomputeStuff();
void RemoveStuff();
private:
std::vector<std::string> data;
};
//Note, RecomputeStuff just reads from std::vector<std::string> data, but it also writes to other global stuff that RemoveStuff also writes to.
void A::RecomputeStuff()
{
boost::upgrade_lock<boost::shared_mutex> lock(values_mutex);
boost::upgrade_to_unique_lock<boost::shared_mutex> unique_lock(lock);
// this function reads std::vector<std::string> data
// but also modifies `globaldata` that RemoveStuff also modifies.
}
void A::RemoveStuff()
{
boost::upgrade_lock<boost::shared_mutex> lock(values_mutex);
boost::upgrade_to_unique_lock<boost::shared_mutex> unique_lock(lock);
//here, remove stuff from std::vector<std::string> data
//...then call RecomputeStuff
RecomputeStuff();
// modify `globaldata`
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
解决方案是将A::RecomputeStuff
方法的未锁定代码移至单独的代码,并从A::RemoveStuff
和A::RecomputeStuff
调用它。请参阅以下代码
boost::shared_mutex values_mutex;
int globaldata;
class A
{
private:
void RecomputeStuffUnsafe();
public:
void RecomputeStuff();
void RemoveStuff();
private:
std::vector<std::string> data;
};
void A::RecomputeStuffUnsafe()
{
// this function reads std::vector<std::string> data
// but also modifies `globaldata` that RemoveStuff also modifies.
}
//Note, RecomputeStuff just reads from std::vector<std::string> data, but it also writes to other global stuff that RemoveStuff also writes to.
void A::RecomputeStuff()
{
boost::upgrade_lock<boost::shared_mutex> lock(values_mutex);
boost::upgrade_to_unique_lock<boost::shared_mutex> unique_lock(lock);
RecomputeStuffUnsafe();
}
void A::RemoveStuff()
{
boost::upgrade_lock<boost::shared_mutex> lock(values_mutex);
boost::upgrade_to_unique_lock<boost::shared_mutex> unique_lock(lock);
//here, remove stuff from std::vector<std::string> data
//...then call RecomputeStuff
RecomputeStuffUnsafe();
// modify `globaldata`
}
修改#00:
此外upgrade_lock
有一个constructor,它接受try_to_lock_t标记。它看起来就像你要求的那样。