我正在p172上从Sedgewick Algorithms in C part 1-4研究Shell排序。
我使用size
(数组的长度),而不是l
和r
(开始和结束);
所以我的代码是
int i,j,h;
int key;
for( h=1;h<=(size-1)/9;h=h*3+1);
for(;h>0;h/=3)
{
for(i=h;i<size;i++)
{
key=num[i];
j=i;
while(j>=h&&key>num[j-h];j-=h)
{
num[j]=num[j-h];
}
num[j]=key;
}
}
我知道这一切。我看了TAOCP。我知道1,4,13 ......是最好的序列(可比较)。 但是在这个位置,我的代码已经
了for(h=1;h<size;h=h*3+1);
我的问题是:他为什么要写h<(size-1)/9
?
“/9
”是什么意思?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
循环:
for (h = 1; h < size; h = h * 3 + 1)
;
大多数时候超过了数组的大小。替代循环将差距保持在范围内。
你可以通过这样一个简单的测试程序自己看到这个:
#include <stdio.h>
static inline int hs_gap9(int size)
{
int h;
for (h = 1; h <= (size - 1) / 9; h = h * 3 + 1)
;
return h;
}
static inline int hs_gap3(int size)
{
int h;
for (h = 1; h < size; h = h * 3 + 1)
;
return h;
}
int main(void)
{
for (int i = 1; i < 100; i++)
printf("Size: %3d; gap9 = %d; gap3 = %d\n", i, hs_gap9(i), hs_gap3(i));
return 0;
}
示例输出:
Size: 1; gap9 = 1; gap3 = 1
Size: 2; gap9 = 1; gap3 = 4
Size: 3; gap9 = 1; gap3 = 4
Size: 4; gap9 = 1; gap3 = 4
Size: 5; gap9 = 1; gap3 = 13
Size: 6; gap9 = 1; gap3 = 13
Size: 7; gap9 = 1; gap3 = 13
Size: 8; gap9 = 1; gap3 = 13
Size: 9; gap9 = 1; gap3 = 13
Size: 10; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 13
Size: 11; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 13
Size: 12; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 13
Size: 13; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 13
Size: 14; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 40
Size: 15; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 40
Size: 16; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 40
…
Size: 34; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 40
Size: 35; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 40
Size: 36; gap9 = 4; gap3 = 40
Size: 37; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 40
Size: 38; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 40
Size: 39; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 40
Size: 40; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 40
Size: 41; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 121
Size: 42; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 121
Size: 43; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 121
…
Size: 97; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 121
Size: 98; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 121
Size: 99; gap9 = 13; gap3 = 121
如您所见,'gap3'算法返回的初始值h
大于数组的大小。 'gap9'算法返回的初始值h
小于数组的大小。这样可以节省一些循环开销(保存外循环的一次迭代,中间循环在第一个循环中退出而不触及内循环。