我写了一个快速而又脏的宏来计算lisp代码。但是,我现在面临的问题是我想在函数中包含一个可选的输出流。但是,我无法弄清楚如何同时使用&optional
中的&body
和defmacro
参数。我找了一些例子,但只发现defun
的那些我认为我理解的。我无法弄清楚为什么这对我失败了。任何提示:
(defmacro timeit (&optional (out-stream *standard-output*) (runs 1) &body body)
"Note that this function may barf if you are depending on a single evaluation
and choose runs to be greater than one. But I guess that will be the
caller's mistake instead."
(let ((start-time (gensym))
(stop-time (gensym))
(temp (gensym))
(retval (gensym)))
`(let ((,start-time (get-internal-run-time))
(,retval (let ((,temp))
(dotimes (i ,runs ,temp)
(setf ,temp ,@body))))
(,stop-time (get-internal-run-time)))
(format ,out-stream
"~CTime spent in expression over ~:d iterations: ~f seconds.~C"
#\linefeed ,runs
(/ (- ,stop-time ,start-time)
internal-time-units-per-second)
#\linefeed)
,retval)))
这就是我打算使用代码的方式:
(timeit (+ 1 1)) ; Vanilla call
(timeit *standard-output* (+ 1 1)) ; Log the output to stdout
(timeit *standard-output* 1000 (+ 1 1)) ; Time over a 1000 iterations.
我认为,defmacro
上(defmacro mac2 (&optional (a 2 b) (c 3 d) &rest x) `'(,a ,b ,c ,d ,x)) => MAC2
(mac2 6) => (6 T 3 NIL NIL)
(mac2 6 3 8) => (6 T 3 T (8))
的{{1}}是一个类似的想法。
(timeit (+ 1 1)) ; Vanilla call
(timeit :out-stream *standard-output* (+ 1 1)) ; Log the output to stdout
(timeit :out-stream *standard-output* :runs 1000 (+ 1 1)) ; Time over a 1000 iterations.
上面显示的用法显然有缺陷。也许,这更好:
{{1}}
感谢。
答案 0 :(得分:3)
应该如何运作?
如何检测到第一件事是可选流?
(timeit a) ; is a the optional stream or an expression to time?
(timeit a b) ; is a the optional stream or an expression to time?
(timeit a b c) ; is a the optional stream or an expression to time?
我会避免这样的宏观角色。
通常我更喜欢:
(with-timings ()
a b c)
并使用流
(with-timings (*standard-output*)
a b c)
第一个列表给出了可选参数。列表本身不是可选的。
该宏应该更容易编写。
通常可能没有必要指定流:
(let ((*standard-output* some-stream))
(timeit a b c))
你可以实现你想要的,但我不会这样做:
(defmacro timeit (&rest args)
(case (length args)
(0 ...)
(1 ...)
(otherwise (destructuring-bind (stream &rest body) ...))))
答案 1 :(得分:1)
(defmacro timeit ((&key
(to-stream *standard-output*)
(with-runs 1))
&body body)
"Note that this function may barf if you are depending on a single evaluation
and choose with-runs to be greater than one. But I guess that will be the
caller's mistake instead."
(let ((start-time (gensym))
(stop-time (gensym))
(temp (gensym))
(retval (gensym))
(elapsed-time (gensym)))
`(let* ((,start-time (get-internal-run-time))
(,retval (let ((,temp))
(dotimes (i ,with-runs ,temp)
(setf ,temp ,@body))))
(,stop-time (get-internal-run-time))
(,elapsed-time (/ (- ,stop-time ,start-time)
internal-time-units-per-second)))
(format ,to-stream
(concatenate 'string
"~CAverage (total) time spent in expression"
" over ~:d iterations: ~f (~f) seconds.~C")
#\linefeed
,with-runs
,elapsed-time
(/ ,elapsed-time ,with-runs)
#\linefeed)
,retval)))
基于Rainer的评论。
使用模式:
(timeit nil (+ 1 1)) ; Vanilla case
(timeit (:to-stream *standard-output*) (+ 1 1)) ; Log to stdout
(timeit (:with-runs 1000) (+ 1 1)) ; Evaluate 1000 times
(timeit (:with-runs 1000 :to-stream *standard-output*) (+ 1 1)) ; Evaluate 1000 times and log to stdout
答案 2 :(得分:1)
我普遍认为这些论点通常应该在一个单独的列表中提供,该列表是宏的第一个参数。这在 with - 类型的宏中尤为常见。其他一些答案已经说明了如何做到这一点,但我认为它也是一个很好的宏写入技术,首先编写实现主要功能的功能版本,然后然后编写一个宏版本。虽然 这里的方法有可能为函数调用开销增加一些时间,但这个方法并不太难。
(defun %timeit (function &optional (runs 1) (stream *standard-output*))
(let ((start (get-internal-run-time))
ret
stop)
(prog1 (dotimes (i runs ret)
(declare (ignorable i))
(setf ret (funcall function)))
(setf stop (get-internal-run-time))
(format stream "~&Time spent in ~a iterations: ~f seconds."
runs
(/ (- stop start) internal-time-units-per-second)))))
(defmacro timeit ((&optional (runs 1) (stream *standard-output*)) &body body)
`(%timeit #'(lambda () ,@body) ,runs ,stream))
CL-USER> (timeit (10000000) (1+ most-positive-fixnum))
Time spent in 10000000 iterations: 0.148 seconds.
4611686018427387904