clang 3.4接受以下代码;而vc ++ NOV 2013 CTP拒绝它时出现错误:
error C2668: 'AreEqual' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
template<class headT, class... tailTypes>
constexpr headT&& __GetFirst__(headT&& value, tailTypes&&...)
{
return static_cast<headT&&>(value);
};
template<class T>
constexpr bool AreEqual(const T& a, const T& b)
{
return a == b;
}
template<class headT, class... tailTypes>
constexpr bool AreEqual(const headT& head_value, const tailTypes&... tail_values)
{
return AreEqual(head_value, __GetFirst__(tail_values...))
&& AreEqual(tail_values...);
}
int main()
{
AreEqual(1, 1, 2, 1);
}
根据C ++ 14标准,哪种编译器是正确的?
更新:完整的错误消息:
error C2668: 'AreEqual' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
1> d:\projects\ktl\test\main.cpp(20): could be 'bool AreEqual<headT,int>(const headT &,const int &)'
1> with
1> [
1> headT=int
1> ]
1> d:\projects\ktl\test\main.cpp(8): or 'bool AreEqual<headT>(const T &,const T &)'
1> with
1> [
1> headT=int
1> , T=int
1> ]
1> while trying to match the argument list '(const int, const int)'
1>
1>Build FAILED.
答案 0 :(得分:8)
Clang(和GCC)的行为是正确的。您可以阅读标准的§14.8.2.4[temp.deduct.partial],了解如何完成功能模板的部分排序,但该子条款第8页中给出的示例直接涵盖了这种情况:
template<class... Args> void f(Args... args); // #1
template<class T1, class... Args> void f(T1 a1, Args... args); // #2
template<class T1, class T2> void f(T1 a1, T2 a2); // #3
f(); // calls #1
f(1, 2, 3); // calls #2
f(1, 2); // calls #3; non-variadic template #3 is more
// specialized than the variadic templates #1 and #2