Swift变量是原子的吗？

时间：2014-06-11 08:14:07

标签： objective-c swift

在Objective-C中，您可以区分原子和非原子属性：

@property (nonatomic, strong) NSObject *nonatomicObject;
@property (atomic, strong) NSObject *atomicObject;

根据我的理解，您可以安全地读取和写入从多个线程定义为原子的属性，而同时从多个线程编写和访问非原子属性或ivars会导致未定义的行为，包括错误的访问错误。

所以如果你在Swift中有这样的变量：

var object: NSObject

我可以安全地并行读取和写入此变量吗？ （不考虑这样做的实际意义）。

6 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分：50)

现在很早就可以假设没有低级文档可用，但您可以从汇编中学习。 Hopper Disassembler是一个很棒的工具。

@interface ObjectiveCar : NSObject
@property (nonatomic, strong) id engine;
@property (atomic, strong) id driver;
@end

分别对非原子和原子使用objc_storeStrong和objc_setProperty_atomic，其中

class SwiftCar {
    var engine : AnyObject?    
    init() {
    }
}

使用swift_retain中的libswift_stdlib_core，显然没有内置线程安全功能。

我们可以推测，稍后可能会引入其他关键字（类似于@lazy）。

更新2015年7月20日：根据此blogpost on singletons快速环境，可以使某些案件对您来说是安全的，例如：

class Car {
    static let sharedCar: Car = Car() // will be called inside of dispatch_once
}

private let sharedCar: Car2 = Car2() // same here
class Car2 {

}

更新05/25/16 ：密切关注快速进化提案https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0030-property-behavior-decls.md - 看起来有可能实施@atomic行为自己。

答案 1 :(得分：10)

Swift没有围绕线程安全的语言结构。假设您将使用提供的库来执行您自己的线程安全管理。 在实现线程安全性方面有很多选项，包括pthread互斥锁，NSLock和dispatch_sync作为互斥机制。请参阅Mike Ash最近关于此主题的帖子：https://mikeash.com/pyblog/friday-qa-2015-02-06-locks-thread-safety-and-swift.html 因此，直接回答您的问题“我可以安全地并行读取和写入此变量吗？”是否。

答案 2 :(得分：7)

回答这个问题可能要早。目前swift缺少访问修饰符，因此没有明显的方法来添加管理属性getter / setter的并发性的代码。此外，Swift语言似乎还没有关于并发性的任何信息！ （它也缺少KVO等......）

我认为这个问题的答案在未来的版本中会变得清晰。

答案 3 :(得分：4)

详细

  • Xcode 9.1，Swift 4
  • Xcode 10.2.1（10E1001），Swift 5

链接

实施类型

主要想法

class Example {

    private lazy var semaphore = DispatchSemaphore(value: 1)

    func executeThreadSafeFunc1() {
        // Lock access. Only first thread can execute code below.
        // Other threads will wait until semaphore.signal() will execute
        semaphore.wait()
        // your code
        semaphore.signal()         // Unlock access
    }

    func executeThreadSafeFunc2() {
        // Lock access. Only first thread can execute code below.
        // Other threads will wait until semaphore.signal() will execute
        semaphore.wait()
        DispatchQueue.global(qos: .background).async {
            // your code
            self.semaphore.signal()         // Unlock access
        }
    }
}

原子访问样本

class Atomic {

    let dispatchGroup = DispatchGroup()
    private var variable = 0

    // Usage of semaphores

    func semaphoreSample() {

        // value: 1 - number of threads that have simultaneous access to the variable
        let atomicSemaphore = DispatchSemaphore(value: 1)
        variable = 0

        runInSeveralQueues { dispatchQueue  in
            // Only (value) queqes can run operations betwen atomicSemaphore.wait() and atomicSemaphore.signal()
            // Others queues await their turn
            atomicSemaphore.wait()            // Lock access until atomicSemaphore.signal()
            self.variable += 1
            print("\(dispatchQueue), value: \(self.variable)")
            atomicSemaphore.signal()          // Unlock access
        }

        notifyWhenDone {
            atomicSemaphore.wait()           // Lock access until atomicSemaphore.signal()
            print("variable = \(self.variable)")
            atomicSemaphore.signal()         // Unlock access
        }
    }

    // Usage of sync of DispatchQueue

    func dispatchQueueSync() {
        let atomicQueue = DispatchQueue(label: "dispatchQueueSync")
        variable = 0

        runInSeveralQueues { dispatchQueue  in

            // Only queqe can run this closure (atomicQueue.sync {...})
            // Others queues await their turn
            atomicQueue.sync {
                self.variable += 1
                print("\(dispatchQueue), value: \(self.variable)")
            }
        }

        notifyWhenDone {
            atomicQueue.sync {
                print("variable = \(self.variable)")
            }
        }
    }

    // Usage of objc_sync_enter/objc_sync_exit

    func objcSync() {
        variable = 0

        runInSeveralQueues { dispatchQueue  in

            // Only one queqe can run operations betwen objc_sync_enter(self) and objc_sync_exit(self)
            // Others queues await their turn
            objc_sync_enter(self)                   // Lock access until objc_sync_exit(self).
            self.variable += 1
            print("\(dispatchQueue), value: \(self.variable)")
            objc_sync_exit(self)                    // Unlock access
        }

        notifyWhenDone {
            objc_sync_enter(self)                   // Lock access until objc_sync_exit(self)
            print("variable = \(self.variable)")
            objc_sync_exit(self)                    // Unlock access
        }
    }
}

// Helpers

extension Atomic {

    fileprivate func notifyWhenDone(closure: @escaping ()->()) {
        dispatchGroup.notify(queue: .global(qos: .utility)) {
            closure()
            print("All work done")
        }
    }

    fileprivate func runInSeveralQueues(closure: @escaping (DispatchQueue)->()) {

        async(dispatch: .main, closure: closure)
        async(dispatch: .global(qos: .userInitiated), closure: closure)
        async(dispatch: .global(qos: .utility), closure: closure)
        async(dispatch: .global(qos: .default), closure: closure)
        async(dispatch: .global(qos: .userInteractive), closure: closure)
    }

    private func async(dispatch: DispatchQueue, closure: @escaping (DispatchQueue)->()) {

        for _ in 0 ..< 100 {
            dispatchGroup.enter()
            dispatch.async {
                let usec = Int(arc4random()) % 100_000
                usleep(useconds_t(usec))
                closure(dispatch)
                self.dispatchGroup.leave()
            }
        }
    }
}

用法

Atomic().semaphoreSample()
//Atomic().dispatchQueueSync()
//Atomic().objcSync()

结果

enter image description here

答案 4 :(得分：1)

这是我广泛使用的原子属性包装器。我将实际的锁定机制设置为协议，因此可以尝试使用不同的机制。我尝试了信号灯DispatchQueues和pthread_rwlock_t。之所以选择pthread_rwlock_t是因为它看起来开销最低，并且优先级倒置的可能性也较小。

/// Defines a basic signature that all locks will conform to. Provides the basis for atomic access to stuff.
protocol Lock {
    init()
    /// Lock a resource for writing. So only one thing can write, and nothing else can read or write.
    func writeLock()
    /// Lock a resource for reading. Other things can also lock for reading at the same time, but nothing else can write at that time.
    func readLock()
    /// Unlock a resource
    func unlock()
}

final class PThreadRWLock: Lock {
    private var rwLock = pthread_rwlock_t()

    init() {
        guard pthread_rwlock_init(&rwLock, nil) == 0 else {
            preconditionFailure("Unable to initialize the lock")
        }
    }

    deinit {
        pthread_rwlock_destroy(&rwLock)
    }

    func writeLock() {
        pthread_rwlock_wrlock(&rwLock)
    }

    func readLock() {
        pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&rwLock)
    }

    func unlock() {
        pthread_rwlock_unlock(&rwLock)
    }
}

/// A property wrapper that ensures atomic access to a value. IE only one thing can write at a time.
/// Multiple things can potentially read at the same time, just not during a write.
/// By using `pthread` to do the locking, this safer then using a `DispatchQueue/barrier` as there isn't a chance
/// of priority inversion.
@propertyWrapper
public final class Atomic<Value> {

    private var value: Value
    private let lock: Lock = PThreadRWLock()

    public init(wrappedValue value: Value) {
        self.value = value
    }

    public var wrappedValue: Value {
        get {
            self.lock.readLock()
            defer { self.lock.unlock() }
            return self.value
        }
        set {
            self.lock.writeLock()
            self.value = newValue
            self.lock.unlock()
        }
    }

    /// Provides a closure that will be called synchronously. This closure will be passed in the current value
    /// and it is free to modify it. Any modifications will be saved back to the original value.
    /// No other reads/writes will be allowed between when the closure is called and it returns.
    public func mutate(_ closure: (inout Value) -> Void) {
        self.lock.writeLock()
        closure(&value)
        self.lock.unlock()
    }
}

答案 5 :(得分：1)

在Swift 5.1中，您可以使用属性包装器为属性设置特定的逻辑。这是原子包装器的实现：

@propertyWrapper
struct atomic<T> {
    private var value: T
    private let lock = NSLock()

    init(wrappedValue value: T) {
        self.value = value
    }

    var wrappedValue: T {
      get { getValue() }
      set { setValue(newValue: newValue) }
    }

    func getValue() -> T {
        lock.lock()
        defer { lock.unlock() }

        return value
    }

    mutating func setValue(newValue: T) {
        lock.lock()
        defer { lock.unlock() }

        value = newValue
    }
}

使用方法：

class Shared {
    @atomic var value: Int
...
}
相关问题
最新问题