我在C中使用管道时遇到了很大的麻烦。我应该从命令行接受参数（例如：./myprogram 123 45 67），一次将一个字符的参数读入缓冲区，发送要计算的子进程的字符，然后返回读取到父进程的字符总数。我的代码如下（注意：评论是我应该做的）：
// Characters from command line arguments are sent to child process
// from parent process one at a time through pipe.
// Child process counts number of characters sent through pipe.
// Child process returns number of characters counted to parent process.
// Parent process prints number of characters counted by child process.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <signal.h>
static int toChild[2];
static int fromChild[2];
static char buffer;
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int status;
int nChars = 0;
pid_t pid;
pipe(toChild);
pipe(fromChild);
if ((pid = fork()) == -1) {
printf("fork error %d\n", pid);
return -1;
}
else if (pid == 0) {
close(toChild[1]);
close(fromChild[0]);
// Receive characters from parent process via pipe
// one at a time, and count them.
int count = 0;
printf("child about to read\n");
while(read(toChild[0], &buffer, 1)){
count++;
}
// Return number of characters counted to parent process.
write(fromChild[1], &count, sizeof(count));
close(toChild[0]);
close(fromChild[1]);
printf("child exits\n");
}
else {
close(toChild[0]);
close(fromChild[1]);
// -- running in parent process --
printf("CS201 - Assignment 3 - Chris Gavette\n");
write(toChild[1], &argv[1], 1);
// Send characters from command line arguments starting with
// argv[1] one at a time through pipe to child process.
read(fromChild[0], &nChars, 1);
// Wait for child process to return. Reap child process.
// Receive number of characters counted via the value
// returned when the child process is reaped.
close(toChild[1]);
close(fromChild[0]);
waitpid(pid, &status, 0);
printf("child counted %d chars\n", nChars);
printf("parent exits\n");
return 0;
}
}
即使我关闭了两个管道的两端，子进程似乎仍然挂起。
答案 0 :(得分：3)
首先，这是错误的。
write(toChild[1], &count, 1)
它最终将导致您的问题。 count是int，不是char或unsigned char。您需要发送sizeof(count)。此外，点击错误时的读取功能将返回EOF，这是非零，因此您的子退出条件不合适。看起来应该是这样的：
while(read(toChild[0], &buffer, 1) == 1)
最后，您的父进程应循环遍历argv[]中的每个参数，并将每个参数作为strlen大小的缓冲区发送。
我几乎可以肯定这是你正在尝试做的事情。请注意，为了在知道哪个描述符用于特定目的时保持理智，我更喜欢使用#define来记录每个进程用于读写的内容。这可以扩展到任何数量的流程，顺便说一句，我确信这对你的下一个任务来说不是太远了：
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <signal.h>
// P0_READ - parent read source
// P0_WRITE - parent write target
// P1_READ - child read source
// P1_WRITE - child write target
#define P0_READ 0
#define P1_WRITE 1
#define P1_READ 2
#define P0_WRITE 3
#define N_PIPES 4
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int fd[N_PIPES], count = 0, i;
pid_t pid;
char c;
if (pipe(fd) || pipe(fd+2))
{
perror("Failed to open pipe(s)");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
// fork child process
if ((pid = fork()) == -1)
{
perror("Failed to fork child process");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
// child process
if (pid == 0)
{
// close non P1 descriptors
close(fd[P0_READ]);
close(fd[P0_WRITE]);
// get chars from input pipe, counting each one.
while(read(fd[P1_READ], &c, 1) == 1)
count++;
printf("Child: count = %d\n", count);
write(fd[P1_WRITE], &count, sizeof(count));
// close remaining descriptors
close(fd[P1_READ]);
close(fd[P1_WRITE]);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
// parent process. start by closing unused descriptors
close(fd[P1_READ]);
close(fd[P1_WRITE]);
// send each arg
for (i=1; i<argc; ++i)
write(fd[P0_WRITE], argv[i], strlen(argv[i]));
// finished sending args
close(fd[P0_WRITE]);
// Wait for child process to return.
wait(NULL);
// wait for total count
if (read(fd[P0_READ], &count, sizeof(count)) == sizeof(count))
printf("Parent: count = %d\n", count);
// close last descriptor
close(fd[P0_READ]);
return 0;
}
<强>输入
./progname argOne argTwo
<强>输出
Child: count = 12
Parent: count = 12
编辑：具有子返回状态的单一管道
从原始问题的评论看来，您的作业可能会要求将子进程的返回状态作为结果计数而不是将其返回到管道中。这样做，您可以使用单个管道描述符对完成此操作。我更喜欢第一种方法，但这也有效：
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <signal.h>
// P0_WRITE - parent write target
// P1_READ - child read source
#define P1_READ 0
#define P0_WRITE 1
#define N_PIPES 2
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int fd[N_PIPES], count = 0;
pid_t pid;
char c;
if (pipe(fd))
{
perror("Failed to open pipe(s)");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
// fork child process
pid = fork();
if (pid == -1)
{
perror("Failed to fork child process");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (pid == 0)
{
// close non P1 descriptors
close(fd[P0_WRITE]);
// Return number of characters counted to parent process.
while(read(fd[P1_READ], &c, 1) == 1)
++count;
close(fd[P1_READ]);
printf("Child: count = %d\n", count);
return count;
}
// parent process. start by closing unused descriptors
close(fd[P1_READ]);
// eacn each arg entirely
for (int i=1; i<argc; ++i)
write(fd[P0_WRITE], argv[i], strlen(argv[i]));
// finished sending args
close(fd[P0_WRITE]);
// Wait for child process to return.
if (wait(&count) == -1)
{
perror("Failed to wait for child process");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
printf("Parent: count = %d\n", WEXITSTATUS(count));
return 0;
}
结果是一样的，但请注意这是一个调试的biach，因为大多数调试器将在您的子进程上发出信号跳闸并且实际退出状态丢失。例如，在我的Mac上，在Xcode游记下运行：
Failed to wait for child process: Interrupted system call
从命令行运行时给出：
Child: count = 12
Parent: count = 12
我更喜欢双管道方法的众多原因之一。