我用GHC 7.8做了相当有趣的事情,但是遇到了一些问题。我有以下内容:
mkResultF :: Eq k => Query kvs ('KV k v) -> k -> ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
mkResultF Here key = ResultComp (pure . lookup key)
mkResultF q@(There p) key =
case mkResultF p key of
ResultFId a -> pure a
ResultComp c ->
ResultComp $ \foo ->
case c foo of
ResultFId a -> pure a
ResultComp c ->
ResultComp $ \foo ->
case c foo of
ResultFId a -> pure a
显然,这里有一些要抽象的内容,但我无法理解如何去做。当我尝试以下内容时:
mkResultF :: Eq k => Query kvs ('KV k v) -> k -> ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
mkResultF Here key = ResultComp (pure . lookup key)
mkResultF q@(There p) key = magic (mkResultF p key)
magic :: ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v) -> ResultF (Reverse kvs ++ '[('KV x y)]) (Maybe v)
magic (ResultFId a) = pure a
magic (ResultComp c) = ResultComp (\foo -> magic (c foo))
这感觉就像一个明显的"解决方案,但它没有键入检查:
Could not deduce (kvs2 ~ Reverse kvs0)
from the context (Reverse kvs ~ ('KV k v1 : kvs2))
bound by a pattern with constructor
ResultComp :: forall a k v (kvs :: [KV * *]).
([(k, v)] -> ResultF kvs a) -> ResultF ('KV k v : kvs) a,
in an equation for `magic'
at query-kv.hs:202:8-19
`kvs2' is a rigid type variable bound by
a pattern with constructor
ResultComp :: forall a k v (kvs :: [KV * *]).
([(k, v)] -> ResultF kvs a) -> ResultF ('KV k v : kvs) a,
in an equation for `magic'
at query-kv.hs:202:8
Expected type: ResultF (Reverse kvs0) (Maybe v)
Actual type: ResultF kvs2 (Maybe v)
Relevant bindings include
c :: [(k, v1)] -> ResultF kvs2 (Maybe v)
(bound at query-kv.hs:202:19)
In the first argument of `magic', namely `(c foo)'
In the expression: magic (c foo)
我真的坚持这个。可在此处找到包含起始代码的完整代码清单:https://gist.github.com/ocharles/669758b762b426a3f930
答案 0 :(得分:8)
为什么启用AllowAmbiguousTypes
?这几乎从来都不是一个好主意。如果没有扩展名,您会收到更好的错误消息:
Couldn't match type ‘Reverse kvs0’ with ‘Reverse kvs’
NB: ‘Reverse’ is a type function, and may not be injective
The type variable ‘kvs0’ is ambiguous
Expected type: ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
-> ResultF (Reverse kvs ++ '['KV x y]) (Maybe v)
Actual type: ResultF (Reverse kvs0) (Maybe v)
-> ResultF (Reverse kvs0 ++ '['KV x0 y0]) (Maybe v)
In the ambiguity check for:
forall (kvs :: [KV * *]) v x y.
ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
-> ResultF (Reverse kvs ++ '['KV x y]) (Maybe v)
To defer the ambiguity check to use sites, enable AllowAmbiguousTypes
In the type signature for ‘magic’:
magic :: ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
-> ResultF (Reverse kvs ++ '[KV x y]) (Maybe v)
问题确实存在于magic
的类型签名中,您有
magic :: ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
-> ResultF (Reverse kvs ++ '[('KV x y)]) (Maybe v)
所有变量kvs
,x
和y
仅作为Reverse
和++
的参数出现,它们是类型系列,不一定是单独的。如情况总是可疑的。
最简单的解决方法是添加代理。这是为我编写代码的代码:
mkResultF :: forall k v kvs. Eq k
=> Query kvs ('KV k v) -> k -> ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
mkResultF Here key = ResultComp (pure . lookup key)
mkResultF (There p) key = magic (Proxy :: Proxy kvs) (mkResultF p key)
magic :: Proxy ('KV x y ': kvs)
-> ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
-> ResultF (Reverse ('KV x y ': kvs)) (Maybe v)
magic _ r =
case r of
ResultFId a -> pure a
ResultComp c ->
ResultComp $ \foo ->
case c foo of
ResultFId a -> pure a
ResultComp c ->
ResultComp $ \foo ->
case c foo of
ResultFId a -> pure a
我再次看过这个,这是一个使用magic
定义的版本(magic2
)。它仍然不是很优雅,但它有望成为一个概念验证:
mkResultF :: forall k v kvs. Eq k
=> Query kvs ('KV k v) -> k -> ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
mkResultF Here key = ResultComp (pure . lookup key)
mkResultF (There p) key = magic1 (Proxy :: Proxy kvs) (mkResultF p key)
magic1 :: forall x y kvs v. Proxy ('KV x y ': kvs)
-> ResultF (Reverse kvs) (Maybe v)
-> ResultF (Reverse ('KV x y ': kvs)) (Maybe v)
magic1 _ = magic2 (Proxy :: Proxy ('KV x y)) (Proxy :: Proxy (Reverse kvs))
magic2 :: Proxy ('KV x y) -> Proxy kvs
-> ResultF kvs (Maybe v)
-> ResultF (kvs ++ '[('KV x y)]) (Maybe v)
magic2 _ _ (ResultFId a) = pure a
magic2 p _ (ResultComp (c :: ([(k, v')] -> ResultF kvs' (Maybe v))))
= ResultComp (\ foo -> magic2 p (Proxy :: Proxy kvs') (c foo))