我遇到了Dijkstra算法的问题,因为我可以访问我创建的列表中的下一个节点,但是我无法将信息保存到“下一个节点”。我使用的结构是一个向量,每个索引都保存有节点。我正在使用向量索引的地址来访问该索引处的节点。
我使用此示例中的节点制作了向量:Linked list with multiple parent and child nodes
#include <iostream>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <limits>
#include <algorithm>
#include <queue>
#include <vector>
#define INFINITY 999
using namespace std;
struct node
{
int id;
int edge_weight;
int distance_to_source;
//used for reverse iteration to find the path
int previous;
//pointing to children of parent node and the addresses are stored
//in an array
struct node* next_node_list[3];
struct node* previous_node[3];
};
int Dijkstra(vector<node> sub,int source, int target)
{
//intializing for main while loops
int best_path_weight =0;
int end_of_loops= (sub.size());
int child = 0;
//intializing intial distances to INF to show that
for(int i=0; i < end_of_loops; i++)
{
sub[i].distance_to_source = INFINITY;
}
//source is set to be 0
sub[source].distance_to_source=0;
//copy of sub for later access
vector<node> copy = sub;
while(!sub.empty())
{
cout << sub.size() << endl;
if(sub[0].distance_to_source == INFINITY)
{
cout << "new node distance2source is INF" << endl;
break;
}
for(int j = 0; (j < 1); j++)
{
if((sub[source].next_node_list[j] == NULL))
{
cout << "null child " <<endl;
break;
}
//nextnode = (sub[0]).next_node_list[j];
child = (sub[0].distance_to_source) + ((sub[0].next_node_list[j]->edge_weight));
if((child) < ((sub[0].next_node_list[j])->distance_to_source))
{
//this is where my problem lies I beleive
((sub[0].next_node_list[j])->distance_to_source) = child;
//used for a reference to have access to final paths
copy[((sub[0].next_node_list[j])->id)].distance_to_source = child;
((sub[0].next_node_list[j])->previous) = sub[0].id;
}
best_path_weight = copy[target].distance_to_source;
}
sub.erase(sub.begin());
}
return best_path_weight;
}
int main() {
vector<node> sub;
// changing size of graph
int number_of_vertices = 3;
int source = 0;
int target = 2;
if(target > number_of_vertices)
cout << "ERROR! target cannot be greater than the number of vertices!" << endl;
for(int i=0; i < number_of_vertices; i++)
{
//Push new node onto a vector
sub.push_back(node());
//assigning information to nodes
sub[i].id = i;
sub[i].edge_weight = 2*i+1;
for(int j = 0; j < 3; j++)
{
sub[i].next_node_list[j]=NULL;
sub[i].previous_node[j]=NULL;
}
}
//node linking declaration
//node 0
sub[0].next_node_list[0]=(&sub[1]);
sub[0].next_node_list[1]=(&sub[2]);
//node 1
sub[1].next_node_list[0]=(&sub[2]);
//sub[1].next_node_list[1]=(&sub[4]);
sub[1].previous_node[0]=(&sub[0]);
//node3
sub[2].previous_node[0]=(&sub[0]);
sub[2].previous_node[1]=(&sub[1]);
cout << "distance "<< Dijkstra(sub, source, target) << endl;
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
您正在存储指向矢量中其他节点的指针。当您复制它时,新节点仍然指向原始向量中的节点。特别是next_node_list
和previous_node
中的指针。
如果您通过引用传递,可能开始工作。但是,将指针存储到动态容器中通常是不安全的。当从向量中添加和删除元素时,它们可以从其在内存中的原始位置移动。如果从前面移除,那么所有剩余的元素都会向前移动。当使用push_back时,可能没有足够的空间,因此可能会进行新的分配,并且元素被复制/移动到一个全新的内存块。
您可以尝试的一件事是使用std::vector<std::shared_ptr<node>>
而不是使用next_node_list
和previous_node
中的原始节点指针,将它们设为std::weak_ptr<node>
。这样可以让你在保持连接完整性的同时改变向量。