Java CMS GC,GC线程在系统空闲时占用CPU

时间:2014-04-01 23:40:11

标签: java garbage-collection jvm tomcat7 concurrent-mark-sweep

我们在tomcat 7,JDK 7,Amazon Linux中有一个Web应用程序。这就是我们对GC配置的要求:

-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled"

我们没有启用“PrintGCDetails”。

这是每隔几秒在gc.log文件中打印出来的内容(直接48小时,此时应用程序的负载低于0 - 绝对没有任何活动,即使以后打印出来也是这些线程占用的CPU为15%)(请参阅下面的上下文):

940568.925: [GC 7425641K(8277888K), 0.2201750 secs]
940572.415: [GC 7425641K(8277888K), 0.1782950 secs]
940574.101: [GC 7425641K(8277888K), 0.1736550 secs]
940577.545: [GC 7425647K(8277888K), 0.1779190 secs]

我们看到以下GC线程占用CPU(总体上大约15%),即使:

  • 系统中没有活动,
  • 除了这些线程之外没有其他线程处于活动状态,这种情况持续48小时,此时系统负载<0>
  • 系统在前24小时内也处于0负载下,然后这些线程变为活动
  • 当这些线程处于活动状态并占用CPU时,前面的行打印在gc.log
  • 这持续了2天当我们最终通过在此JVM中调用Web应用程序5分钟来加载时,然后它们都停止了。我们注意到这些线程现在不再占用CPU(它们占用<1%)。一旦FULL GC发生,问题似乎已经解决了。系统负载后发生了FULL GC。
  • 简而言之,当系统处于0负载状态48小时时,GC线程继续占用15%的CPU。

这些是主题:

"Gang worker#0 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad9402e000 nid=0x629d runnable
"Gang worker#1 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94030000 nid=0x629e runnable
"Gang worker#2 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94031800 nid=0x629f runnable
"Gang worker#3 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94033800 nid=0x62a0 runnable
"Gang worker#4 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94035800 nid=0x62a1 runnable
"Gang worker#5 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94037000 nid=0x62a2 runnable
"Gang worker#6 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94039000 nid=0x62a3 runnable
"Gang worker#7 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad9403b000 nid=0x62a4 runnable
"Gang worker#8 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad9403d000 nid=0x62a5 runnable
"Gang worker#9 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad9403e800 nid=0x62a6 runnable
"Gang worker#10 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94040800 nid=0x62a7 runnable
"Gang worker#11 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94042800 nid=0x62a8 runnable
"Gang worker#12 (Parallel GC Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94044000 nid=0x62a9 runnable
"Concurrent Mark-Sweep GC Thread" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad9418b000 nid=0x62ae runnable
"Gang worker#0 (Parallel CMS Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94183000 nid=0x62aa runnable
"Gang worker#1 (Parallel CMS Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94185000 nid=0x62ab runnable
"Gang worker#2 (Parallel CMS Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94187000 nid=0x62ac runnable
"Gang worker#3 (Parallel CMS Threads)" prio=10 tid=0x00007fad94188800 nid=0x62ad runnable

问题1:当这些线程占用15%的CPU时,为什么gc日志会被以下内容填充?

940568.925: [GC 7425641K(8277888K), 0.2201750 secs]
940572.415: [GC 7425641K(8277888K), 0.1782950 secs]

问题2:上述日志是否表明CMS失败(标记,扫描等)?

问题3:当我们在Web应用程序上引入适度负载并且发生FULL GC时,为什么它会自行解决?

是的,我会尝试在启用了printGCDetails的其他环境中复制该问题,并返回信息或解决方案 - 如果有人之前已经看过,请加入对话。

编辑1:这是启用“PrintGCDetails”时的日志:

1376.326: [GC [1 CMS-initial-mark: 6481517K(7281088K)] 6536750K(8277888K), 0.0094620 secs] [Times: user=0.01 sys=0.00, real=0.01 secs] 
1376.336: [CMS-concurrent-mark-start]
1377.992: [CMS-concurrent-mark: 1.656/1.656 secs] [Times: user=6.62 sys=0.00, real=1.66 secs] 
1377.992: [CMS-concurrent-preclean-start]
1378.005: [CMS-concurrent-preclean: 0.014/0.014 secs] [Times: user=0.01 sys=0.00, real=0.01 secs] 

1378.006: [CMS-concurrent-abortable-preclean-start]
CMS: abort preclean due to time 1413.110: [CMS-concurrent-abortable-preclean: 4.169/35.104 secs] [Times: user=4.23 sys=0.01, real=35.11 secs] 
1413.111: [GC[YG occupancy: 55233 K (996800 K)]1413.111: [Rescan (parallel) , 0.0154040 secs]1413.126: [weak refs processing, 0.0001380 secs]1413.126: [class unloading, 0.0013450 secs]1413.128: [scrub symbol table, 0.0023140 secs]1413.130: [scrub string table, 0.0004850 secs] [1 CMS-remark: 6481517K(7281088K)] 6536751K(8277888K), 0.0201870 secs] [Times: user=0.20 sys=0.00, real=0.02 secs] 
1413.131: [CMS-concurrent-sweep-start]
1414.151: [CMS-concurrent-sweep: 1.020/1.020 secs] [Times: user=1.02 sys=0.00, real=1.02 secs] 
1414.151: [CMS-concurrent-reset-start]
1414.177: [CMS-concurrent-reset: 0.026/0.026 secs] [Times: user=0.03 sys=0.00, real=0.02 secs] 

另请注意:“CMSMaxAbortablePrecleanTime”设置为35秒。 感谢。

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:0)

在占用的堆和可用的堆之间必须有足够的缓冲区。增强(max)堆的大小,使占用总量的70%解决了问题。当算法是CMS时,这尤其重要。 经验教训。

相关问题