我有一些代码可以在当前目录中找到最近修改过的某种类型的文件(见下文)。我的问题是:是否有更简洁,也许更惯用的Racket,表达此代码的方式?这个想法很简单:在目录中获取某种类型的所有文件,然后只选择最近修改过的文件。我使用cwd-paths-of-type
尝试了for*/list
的变体,但它似乎不太可读。我觉得我错过了什么。谁能开导我?
#lang racket
(define FILETYPE ".pdf")
(define (cwd-paths-of-type filetype)
(filter
(lambda (p)
(define filename (path->string p))
(and
(>= (string-length filename) 4)
(string=?
(substring filename (- (string-length filename) 4))
filetype)))
(directory-list)))
(define (last-mod-path paths)
(define last-mod-time
(apply
max
(map file-or-directory-modify-seconds paths)))
(first
(filter
(lambda (p)
(equal?
(file-or-directory-modify-seconds p)
last-mod-time))
paths)))
(displayln
(last-mod-path (cwd-paths-of-type FILETYPE)))
答案 0 :(得分:7)
几个球拍功能可以在这里为您提供帮助,filename-extension
和argmax
:
请注意filename-extension
的结果是byte string,但如果必须使用字符串,则很容易转换。
(define FILETYPE #"pdf")
(define (cwd-paths-of-type filetype)
(filter
(λ (p)
(define ext (filename-extension p))
(and ext (bytes=? ext filetype)))
(directory-list)))
(define (last-mod-path paths) (argmax file-or-directory-modify-seconds paths))
(displayln (last-mod-path (cwd-paths-of-type FILETYPE)))
答案 1 :(得分:0)
这是编写last-mod-path的另一种方法,不使用map和filter and apply,而是使用迭代方法。无需两次使用这些功能,即。
(define (last-mod-path paths)
(if (null? (cdr paths)) (car paths)
(if (> (file-or-directory-modify-seconds (car paths))
(file-or-directory-modify-seconds (last-mod-path (cdr paths))))
(car paths)
(last-mod-path (cdr paths)))))