我有IObservable<String>。
我正在尝试检测（并处理）短时间内通知相同字符串的情况。
我想要一个filter / stream / observable，如果相同的字符串在彼此相差250ms内得到通知，它只会通知一次。
不确定从哪里开始。
答案 0 :(得分：10)
这是一个相当紧凑的解决方案。你的帖子有点暧昧关于持续时间是否会在一个明确的值到来时立即重置 - 所以我为这两种解释提供了两种解决方案。
这是当你严格关注抑制的持续时间而不关心是否存在任何“中间”值（根据McGarnagle的解决方案） - 即如果你快速得到"a", "b" ,"a"，你仍然想要抑制第二个"a"。幸运的是，对于GroupByUntil，持续时间分组并发出每个组的第一个元素非常容易：
public static IObservable<T> DistinctUntilChanged<T>(
this IObservable<T> source, TimeSpan duration, IScheduler scheduler)
{
if (scheduler == null) scheduler = Scheduler.Default;
return source.GroupByUntil(k => k,
_ => Observable.Timer(duration, scheduler))
.SelectMany(y => y.FirstAsync());
}
如果您想知道方法名称 - 我首先想出了Variation 2b;我把名字留在上面，因此单元测试仍然通过。它可能需要更好的名称，如SuppressDuplicatesWithinWindow或类似的......
这稍微复杂一些 - 现在不同组中的任何事件将结束给定的组。我使用Publish（）。RefCount（）组合来防止对源的多个订阅，并且必须非常小心null：
public static IObservable<T> DistinctUntilChanged<T>(
this IObservable<T> source, TimeSpan duration, IScheduler scheduler)
{
if (scheduler == null) scheduler = Scheduler.Default;
var sourcePub = source.Publish().RefCount();
return sourcePub.GroupByUntil(
k => k,
x => Observable.Timer(duration, scheduler)
.TakeUntil(
sourcePub.Where(i => ReferenceEquals(null, i)
? !ReferenceEquals(null, x.Key)
: !i.Equals(x.Key))))
.SelectMany(y => y.FirstAsync());
}
这是我尝试的原始方法，我已添加它，因为它现在并不是那么糟糕，因为我对2a的改进使它更复杂：
Observable.DistinctUntilChanged的变体接受持续时间。给定一个事件，该持续时间内的连续重复事件将被抑制。如果到达不同的事件，或者事件在该持续时间之外到达，则会发出该事件并重置抑制计时器。
它通过使用接受IEqualityComparer的DistinctUntilChanged的重载来工作。如果值匹配且时间戳在指定的持续时间内，则比较器会将应用了TimeStamp的事件视为相等。
public static partial class ObservableExtensions
{
public static IObservable<T> DistinctUntilChanged<T>(
this IObservable<T> source, TimeSpan duration, IScheduler scheduler)
{
if (scheduler == null) scheduler = Scheduler.Default;
return source.Timestamp(scheduler)
.DistinctUntilChanged(new Comparer<T>(duration))
.Select(ts => ts.Value);
}
private class Comparer<T> : IEqualityComparer<Timestamped<T>>
{
private readonly TimeSpan _duration;
public Comparer(TimeSpan duration)
{
_duration = duration;
}
public bool Equals(Timestamped<T> x, Timestamped<T> y)
{
if (y.Timestamp - x.Timestamp > _duration) return false;
return ReferenceEquals(x.Value, y.Value)
&& !ReferenceEquals(null,x.Value)
&& x.Value.Equals(y.Value);
}
public int GetHashCode(Timestamped<T> obj)
{
if (ReferenceEquals(null,obj.Value)) return obj.Timestamp.GetHashCode();
return obj.Value.GetHashCode() ^ obj.Timestamp.GetHashCode();
}
}
}
以下是我使用的单元测试（包括nuget包rx-testing和nunit）：
public class TestDistinct : ReactiveTest
{
[Test]
public void DuplicateWithinDurationIsSupressed()
{
var scheduler = new TestScheduler();
var source =scheduler.CreateColdObservable(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(200, "a"));
var duration = TimeSpan.FromTicks(250);
var results = scheduler.CreateObserver<string>();
source.DistinctUntilChanged(duration, scheduler).Subscribe(results);
scheduler.AdvanceBy(1000);
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100, "a"));
}
[Test]
public void NonDuplicationWithinDurationIsNotSupressed()
{
var scheduler = new TestScheduler();
var source = scheduler.CreateColdObservable(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(200, "b"));
var duration = TimeSpan.FromTicks(250);
var results = scheduler.CreateObserver<string>();
source.DistinctUntilChanged(duration, scheduler).Subscribe(results);
scheduler.AdvanceBy(1000);
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100,"a"),
OnNext(200,"b"));
}
[Test]
public void DuplicateAfterDurationIsNotSupressed()
{
var scheduler = new TestScheduler();
var source = scheduler.CreateColdObservable(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(400, "a"));
var duration = TimeSpan.FromTicks(250);
var results = scheduler.CreateObserver<string>();
source.DistinctUntilChanged(duration, scheduler).Subscribe(results);
scheduler.AdvanceBy(1000);
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(400, "a"));
}
[Test]
public void NonDuplicateAfterDurationIsNotSupressed()
{
var scheduler = new TestScheduler();
var source = scheduler.CreateColdObservable(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(400, "b"));
var duration = TimeSpan.FromTicks(250);
var results = scheduler.CreateObserver<string>();
source.DistinctUntilChanged(duration, scheduler).Subscribe(results);
scheduler.AdvanceBy(1000);
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(400, "b"));
}
[Test]
public void TestWithSeveralValues()
{
var scheduler = new TestScheduler();
var source = scheduler.CreateColdObservable(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(200, "a"),
OnNext(300, "b"),
OnNext(350, "c"),
OnNext(450, "b"),
OnNext(900, "a"));
var duration = TimeSpan.FromTicks(250);
var results = scheduler.CreateObserver<string>();
source.DistinctUntilChanged(duration, scheduler).Subscribe(results);
scheduler.AdvanceBy(1000);
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(300, "b"),
OnNext(350, "c"),
OnNext(450, "b"),
OnNext(900, "a"));
}
[Test]
public void CanHandleNulls()
{
var scheduler = new TestScheduler();
var source = scheduler.CreateColdObservable(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(400, (string)null),
OnNext(500, "b"),
OnNext(600, (string)null),
OnNext(700, (string)null));
var duration = TimeSpan.FromTicks(250);
var results = scheduler.CreateObserver<string>();
source.DistinctUntilChanged(duration, scheduler).Subscribe(results);
scheduler.AdvanceBy(1000);
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(400, (string)null),
OnNext(500, "b"),
OnNext(600, (string)null));
}
[Test]
public void TwoDuplicatesWithinDurationAreSupressed()
{
var scheduler = new TestScheduler();
var source = scheduler.CreateColdObservable(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(150, "a"),
OnNext(200, "a"));
var duration = TimeSpan.FromTicks(250);
var results = scheduler.CreateObserver<string>();
source.DistinctUntilChanged(duration, scheduler).Subscribe(results);
scheduler.AdvanceBy(1000);
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100, "a"));
}
[Test]
public void TwoNullDuplicatesWithinDurationAreSupressed()
{
var scheduler = new TestScheduler();
var source = scheduler.CreateColdObservable(
OnNext(100, (string)null),
OnNext(150, (string)null),
OnNext(200, (string)null));
var duration = TimeSpan.FromTicks(250);
var results = scheduler.CreateObserver<string>();
source.DistinctUntilChanged(duration, scheduler).Subscribe(results);
scheduler.AdvanceBy(1000);
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100, (string)null));
}
}
最后为完整性 - 变量1将传递TestWithSeveralValues测试的以下变体：
[Test]
public void TestWithSeveralValuesVariation1()
{
var scheduler = new TestScheduler();
var source = scheduler.CreateColdObservable(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(200, "a"),
OnNext(300, "b"),
OnNext(350, "c"),
OnNext(450, "b"),
OnNext(900, "a"));
var duration = TimeSpan.FromTicks(250);
var results = scheduler.CreateObserver<string>();
source.DistinctUntilChanged(duration, scheduler).Subscribe(results);
scheduler.AdvanceBy(1000);
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(300, "b"),
OnNext(350, "c"),
OnNext(900, "a"));
}
并且null测试将改为最终：
results.Messages.AssertEqual(
OnNext(100, "a"),
OnNext(400, (string)null),
OnNext(500, "b"),
OnNext(700, (string)null)); /* This line changes */
答案 1 :(得分：1)
您正在寻找Observable.Throttle
忽略可观察序列中的值，这些值在指定的source和dueTime到期之前跟随另一个值。
修改
好的，所以上面只能按照OP来限制序列中的所有元素，不是按键。我认为这将是一个简单的下一步，但也许不是那么多？ （F＃有一个split函数会有所帮助，但显然没有C＃等价。）
所以，这是尝试实施Split：
public static class Extension
{
public static IDisposable SplitSubscribe<T, TKey>(
this IObservable<T> source,
Func<T, TKey> keySelector,
Action<IObservable<TKey>> subscribe)
{
// maintain a list of Observables, one for each key (TKey)
var observables = new ConcurrentDictionary<TKey, Subject<TKey>>();
// function to create a new Subject
Func<TKey, Subject<TKey>> createSubject = key =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Added for " + key);
var retval = new Subject<TKey>();
subscribe(retval);
retval.OnNext(key);
return retval;
};
// function to update an existing Subject
Func<TKey, Subject<TKey>, Subject<TKey>> updateSubject = (key, existing) =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Updated for " + key);
existing.OnNext(key);
return existing;
};
return source.Subscribe(next =>
{
var key = keySelector(next);
observables.AddOrUpdate(key, createSubject, updateSubject);
});
// TODO dispose of all subscribers
}
// special case: key selector is just the item pass-through
public static IDisposable SplitSubscribe<T>(
this IObservable<T> source,
Action<IObservable<T>> subscribe)
{
return source.SplitSubscribe(item => item, subscribe);
}
}
使用此功能，您可以拆分源可观察对象，然后对每个源进行限制。用法是这样的：
IObservable<string> dummyObservable = new string[] { "a", "b", "a", "b", "b", "c", "a" }.ToObservable();
dummyObservable.SplitSubscribe(next =>
next.Throttle(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(250)).Subscribe(Console.WriteLine));
输出（未保留原始订单）
Added for a Added for b Updated for a Updated for b Updated for b Added for c Updated for a a c b