我通过“SHOW INNODB STATUS”收到以下死锁日志。有人可以解释为什么交易被中止了吗？似乎事务2持有锁，但是也被卡住请求相同的锁（“等待”部分除外），这在事务1需要它时也会导致死锁。
=====================================
091205 6:25:01 INNODB MONITOR OUTPUT
=====================================
Per second averages calculated from the last 39 seconds
----------
SEMAPHORES
----------
OS WAIT ARRAY INFO: reservation count 233826, signal count 229982
Mutex spin waits 0, rounds 1569878, OS waits 4740
RW-shared spins 517345, OS waits 227127; RW-excl spins 4390, OS waits 1945
------------------------
LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK
------------------------
091205 6:19:35
*** (1) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 0 479286429, ACTIVE 0 sec, process no 17618, OS thread id 2963139472 fetching rows
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 176 lock struct(s), heap size 11584
MySQL thread id 330396, query id 97467367 64-71-26-218.static.wiline.com 64.71.26.218 autotaggeruser Sorting result
SELECT api_key,completed,compute_units,created,deleted,flags,func_name,group_id,hostname,is_meta,jid,label,language,num_children,parent_ujid,priority,process_id,restartable,status,type,uid,ujid,version,wid FROM jobs WHERE status='new' and is_meta=0 ORDER BY priority asc,jid asc FOR UPDATE
*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 17549 n bits 128 index `PRIMARY` of table `takeyourorder/jobs` trx id 0 479286429 lock_mode X waiting
Record lock, heap no 61 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 26; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 800000000000277c; asc '|;; 1: len 6; hex 00001c915499; asc T ;; 2: len 7; hex 00000006e21e2a; asc *;; 3: len 8; hex 8000000000000002; asc ;; 4: len 8; hex 8000000000000845; asc E;; 5: SQL NULL; 6: len 8; hex 8000000000002773; asc 's;; 7: len 1; hex 80; asc ;; 8: len 8; hex 8000000000000002; asc ;; 9: len 16; hex 636f72656f66746865627261696e2d75; asc coreofthebrain-u;; 10: len 4; hex 80000eb8; asc ;; 11: len 1; hex 01; asc ;; 12: len 30; hex 322e362e32202872656c6561736532362d6d61696e742c20417072203139; asc 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19;...(truncated); 13: len 30; hex 5f5f6d61696e5f5f2e3c6c616d6264613e206174203c737464696e3e3a31; asc __main__.<lambda> at <stdin>:1;; 14: len 5; hex 8000000001; asc ;; 15: len 0; hex ; asc ;; 16: len 4; hex 80000000; asc ;; 17: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; 18: len 4; hex 4b19fb58; asc K X;; 19: len 4; hex 4b19fb77; asc K w;; 20: len 1; hex 07; asc ;; 21: len 1; hex 80; asc ;; 22: len 4; hex 80000000; asc ;; 23: len 4; hex 80000000; asc ;; 24: len 1; hex 80; asc ;; 25: len 4; hex 80001415; asc ;;
*** (2) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 0 479286425, ACTIVE 0 sec, process no 17618, OS thread id 2971134864 starting index read, thread declared inside InnoDB 500
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
7 lock struct(s), heap size 1024, undo log entries 3
MySQL thread id 330430, query id 97467371 64-71-26-218.static.wiline.com 64.71.26.218 autotaggeruser Updating
UPDATE jobs SET status='done' WHERE jid=10099
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 17549 n bits 128 index `PRIMARY` of table `takeyourorder/jobs` trx id 0 479286425 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 61 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 26; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 800000000000277c; asc '|;; 1: len 6; hex 00001c915499; asc T ;; 2: len 7; hex 00000006e21e2a; asc *;; 3: len 8; hex 8000000000000002; asc ;; 4: len 8; hex 8000000000000845; asc E;; 5: SQL NULL; 6: len 8; hex 8000000000002773; asc 's;; 7: len 1; hex 80; asc ;; 8: len 8; hex 8000000000000002; asc ;; 9: len 16; hex 636f72656f66746865627261696e2d75; asc coreofthebrain-u;; 10: len 4; hex 80000eb8; asc ;; 11: len 1; hex 01; asc ;; 12: len 30; hex 322e362e32202872656c6561736532362d6d61696e742c20417072203139; asc 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19;...(truncated); 13: len 30; hex 5f5f6d61696e5f5f2e3c6c616d6264613e206174203c737464696e3e3a31; asc __main__.<lambda> at <stdin>:1;; 14: len 5; hex 8000000001; asc ;; 15: len 0; hex ; asc ;; 16: len 4; hex 80000000; asc ;; 17: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; 18: len 4; hex 4b19fb58; asc K X;; 19: len 4; hex 4b19fb77; asc K w;; 20: len 1; hex 07; asc ;; 21: len 1; hex 80; asc ;; 22: len 4; hex 80000000; asc ;; 23: len 4; hex 80000000; asc ;; 24: len 1; hex 80; asc ;; 25: len 4; hex 80001415; asc ;;
*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 17548 n bits 144 index `PRIMARY` of table `takeyourorder/jobs` trx id 0 479286425 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waiting
Record lock, heap no 73 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 26; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 8000000000002773; asc 's;; 1: len 6; hex 00001c9151f5; asc Q ;; 2: len 7; hex 800000003c0110; asc < ;; 3: len 8; hex 8000000000000002; asc ;; 4: len 8; hex 800000000000083d; asc =;; 5: SQL NULL; 6: SQL NULL; 7: len 1; hex 81; asc ;; 8: len 8; hex 8000000000000002; asc ;; 9: len 16; hex 636f72656f66746865627261696e2d75; asc coreofthebrain-u;; 10: len 4; hex 80000eb8; asc ;; 11: len 1; hex 01; asc ;; 12: len 30; hex 322e362e32202872656c6561736532362d6d61696e742c20417072203139; asc 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19;...(truncated); 13: len 30; hex 5f5f6d61696e5f5f2e3c6c616d6264613e206174203c737464696e3e3a31; asc __main__.<lambda> at <stdin>:1;; 14: len 5; hex 8000000001; asc ;; 15: len 0; hex ; asc ;; 16: len 4; hex 80000000; asc ;; 17: len 4; hex 80000005; asc ;; 18: len 4; hex 4b19fb58; asc K X;; 19: SQL NULL; 20: len 1; hex 02; asc ;; 21: len 1; hex 80; asc ;; 22: len 4; hex 80000014; asc ;; 23: len 4; hex 80000000; asc ;; 24: len 1; hex 80; asc ;; 25: SQL NULL;
*** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (1)
答案 0 :(得分：6)
第一步是确定两个查询是什么：
SELECT api_key，completed，
compute_units，created，deleted，flags，func_name，group_id，hostname，is_meta，jid，label，languagenum_children，{{ 1}}，priority，parent_ujid，restartable，status，type，uid，ujid，version，wid FROM jobs WHERE status ='new'和is_meta = 0 ORDER BY priority asc，jid asc FOR UPDATE < /强>
..和
UPDATE jobs SET status ='done'WHER jid = 10099
第一个是SELECT，第二个是UPDATE。但关键是SELECT末尾的process_id，我以粗体强调了这一点。
FOR UPDATE语法用于锁定读取 - 您可以read the documentation about it here。 MySQL deadlock documentation如果您遇到类似这些问题的锁定问题，请使用FOR UPDATE。
答案 1 :(得分：4)
我不是百分百肯定，但我相信他们不是“同样的锁”。
* （1）等待此锁定被授予：RECORD LOCKS空格id 0 page no 17549 n bits 128表
PRIMARY的索引takeyourorder/jobstrx id 0 479286429 lock_mode X waiting记录锁，堆没有61 物理记录：n_fields 26;紧凑格式;信息位0* （2）HOLDS THE LOCK（S）：RECORD LOCKS space id 0 page no 17549 n bits 128 table
PRIMARYtrx id 0的takeyourorder/jobs索引 479286425 lock_mode X锁定rec而不是间隙记录锁定，堆没有61 物理记录：n_fields 26;紧凑格式;信息位0* （2）等待此锁定被授予：RECORD LOCKS空格id 0页号17548 n位144表
PRIMARY的索引takeyourorder/jobstrx id 0 479286425 lock_mode X锁定rec而不是间隙等待记录 锁，堆没有73物理记录：n_fields 26;紧凑格式;信息 位0
Tx（2）保持“堆没有61”记录锁并等待“堆没有73”记录锁定。 Tx（1）正在等待“堆没有61”。日志不会告诉谁持有“堆没有73”，但可能只是“SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS”的限制。 您可以确认通过简单的死锁方案生成类似的日志。