这可以在for循环中完成吗?
TickEventArgs targs1 = new TickEventArgs(lbl1_up_time, _elapsedTime_up1);
timer_up1.Tick += (sender, e) => Tick(targs1);
TickEventArgs targs2 = new TickEventArgs(lbl2_up_time, _elapsedTime_up2);
timer_up2.Tick += (sender, e) => Tick(targs2);
TickEventArgs targs3 = new TickEventArgs(lbl3_up_time, _elapsedTime_up3);
timer_up3.Tick += (sender, e) => Tick(targs3);
TickEventArgs targs4 = new TickEventArgs(lbl4_up_time, _elapsedTime_up4);
timer_up4.Tick += (sender, e) => Tick(targs4);
TickEventArgs targs5 = new TickEventArgs(lbl5_up_time, _elapsedTime_up5);
timer_up5.Tick += (sender, e) => Tick(targs5);
这不起作用,因为我超出界限(5)
targs[0] = new TickEventArgs(lbl1_up_time, _elapsedTime_up1);
targs[1] = new TickEventArgs(lbl2_up_time, _elapsedTime_up2);
targs[2] = new TickEventArgs(lbl3_up_time, _elapsedTime_up3);
targs[3] = new TickEventArgs(lbl4_up_time, _elapsedTime_up4);
targs[4] = new TickEventArgs(lbl5_up_time, _elapsedTime_up5);
timers[0] = timer_up1;
timers[1] = timer_up2;
timers[2] = timer_up3;
timers[3] = timer_up4;
timers[4] = timer_up5;
int i = 0;
for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++)
{
timers[i].Tick += (sender, e) => Tick(targs[i]);
}
答案 0 :(得分:10)
这是来自lambda表达式; i
is shared between all of them。当函数执行时,它们基本上被称为timers[i].Tick += (sender, e) => Tick(targs[5])
。
要避免这种情况,请创建一个本地范围的变量(int locali = i
)并在您的行中使用它。这将确保每个lambda表达式实际上获得您期望的值。
for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++)
{
int locali = i;
timers[locali].Tick += (sender, e) => Tick(targs[locali]);
}
退出前, i
从循环的最后一次迭代变为5。当然,您没有targs[5]
元素,因此它会抛出IndexOutOfRangeException
。
从技术上讲,您不需要locali
用于timers[i].Tick
部分,因为它会立即进行评估,但我个人觉得将两者混合会让人感到困惑。
关于概念的一些额外阅读:
答案 1 :(得分:8)
在这种情况下只有一个i
,并且所有lambda都捕获相同的值。使用作用于循环的本地,以便每个lambda具有不同的副本
for (i = 0; i <= 4; i++)
{
int j = i;
timers[j].Tick += (sender, e) => Tick(targs[j]);
}