使用Merge Sort计算反转次数

时间:2013-07-14 03:07:28

标签: algorithm scala sorting mergesort

我需要使用Merge Sort计算反转次数:

object Example {
 def msort(xs: List[Int]): List[Int] = {
    def merge(left: List[Int], right: List[Int]): Stream[Int] = (left, right) match {
      case (x :: xs, y :: ys) if x < y => Stream.cons(x, merge(xs, right))
      case (x :: xs, y :: ys) => Stream.cons(y, merge(left, ys))
      case _ => if (left.isEmpty) right.toStream else left.toStream
    }

    val n = xs.length / 2
    if (n == 0) xs
    else {
      val (ys, zs) = xs splitAt n
      merge(msort(ys), msort(zs)).toList
    }
  }                                              

  msort(List(8, 15, 3))                           
}

我想我必须在行中计算(y < ymatch中的第二行)

case (x :: xs, y :: ys) => Stream.cons(y, merge(left, ys))

然而,当我尝试失败时。

我该怎么做?

更新

带累加器的版本:

def msort(xs: List[Int]): List[Int] = {
    def merge(left: List[Int], right: List[Int], inversionAcc: Int = 0): Stream[Int] = (left, right) match {
      case (x :: xs, y :: ys) if x < y => Stream.cons(x, merge(xs, right, inversionAcc))
      case (x :: xs, y :: ys) => Stream.cons(y, merge(left, ys, inversionAcc + 1))
      case _ => if (left.isEmpty) right.toStream else left.toStream
    }

    val n = xs.length / 2
    if (n == 0) xs
    else {
      val (ys, zs) = xs splitAt n
      merge(msort(ys), msort(zs)).toList
    }
  } 

如何轻松返回inversionAcc?我想,我可以像这样返回元组的一部分:

def merge(left: List[Int], right: List[Int], invariantAcc: Int = 0): (Stream[Int], Int)

但它看起来不太好。

UPDATE2

它实际上没有计算正确,我找不到错误的位置。

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

这是我Frege solution的Scala端口。

object CountInversions {

  def inversionCount(xs: List[Int], size: Int): (Int, List[Int]) = 
    xs match {
        case _::_::_ => { //If the list has more than one element
          val mid = size / 2
          val lsize = mid
          val rsize = size - mid
          val (left, right) = xs.splitAt(mid)
          val (lcount, lsorted) = inversionCount(left, lsize)
          val (rcount, rsorted) = inversionCount(right, rsize)
          val (mergecount, sorted) = inversionMergeCount(lsorted, lsize, rsorted,
            rsize, 0, Nil)
          val count = lcount + rcount + mergecount
          (count, sorted)
        }
        case xs => (0, xs)
     }

  def inversionMergeCount(xs: List[Int], m: Int, ys: List[Int], n: Int, 
    acc: Int, sorted: List[Int]): (Int, List[Int]) = 
      (xs, ys) match {
        case (xs, Nil) => (acc, sorted.reverse ++ xs)
        case (Nil, ys) => (acc, sorted.reverse ++ ys)
        case (x :: restx, y :: resty) => 
          if (x < y) inversionMergeCount(restx, m - 1, ys, n, acc, x :: sorted)
          else if (x > y) inversionMergeCount(xs, m, resty, n - 1, acc + m, y :: sorted)
          else inversionMergeCount(restx, m - 1, resty, n - 1, acc, x :: y :: sorted)
      }

}

答案 1 :(得分:1)

如果解决方案不一定非常严格,那么您只需添加一个简单的计数器:

object Example {
  var inversions = 0
  def msort(xs: List[Int]): List[Int] = {
    def merge(left: List[Int], right: List[Int]): Stream[Int] = (left, right) match {
      case (x :: xs, y :: ys) if x < y => Stream.cons(x, merge(xs, right))
      case (x :: xs, y :: ys) =>
        inversions = inversions + 1
        Stream.cons(y, merge(left, ys))
      case _ => if (left.isEmpty) right.toStream else left.toStream
    }

    val n = xs.length / 2
    if (n == 0) xs
    else {
      val (ys, zs) = xs splitAt n
      merge(msort(ys), msort(zs)).toList
    }
  }
}
Example.msort(List(8, 15, 3))
println(Example.inversions)

如果它必须保持功能,那么你需要创建一个累加器并将其穿过所有方法调用并从每个函数返回一个Pair,其中累加器值包含在返回结果中,然后求累加器值对于每个合并收敛。 (我的功能性不是很好,在尝试简单的var方法之前,我已经尝试过在功能上解决这个问题。)