#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
//I want such a container that holds an array and don't want to expose array directly
template <size_t T>
class Container{
public:
Container(int in[]);
int getValue(const unsigned int pos);
//void setValue(const unsigned int pos,const int value);
unsigned int getSize();
/*...
...
...*/
unsigned int theSize;
int theArray[T];
};
template <size_t T>
Container<T>::Container(int in[]){
theSize=T;
for (unsigned int i=0;i<T;i++)
theArray[i]=in[i];
}
template <size_t T>
int Container<T>::getValue(const unsigned int pos){return theArray[pos];}
template <size_t T>
unsigned int Container<T>::getSize(){
return theSize;
}
//then I want to pass objects of this type around by address, but then to use that address //I have to do such design as follows, now would you prohibit me from doing this?
void someFunc(void * in){
Container<1> * ptr=reinterpret_cast<Container<1> *>(in);
unsigned int times=ptr->getSize();
for (unsigned int i=0;i<times;i++)
cout <<ptr->getValue(i)<<' ';
cout <<'\n';
}
int main(int argc,char ** argv){
int araye[10]={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10};
Container<10> obj(araye);
someFunc(&obj);
cin.get();
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
是的,我会禁止您实施此容器。你正在重新发明轮子,据我所知,没有理由。
请改用std::array
。即使您不能使用C ++ 11(其中引入了array
),您也应该使用已经设计,构建和测试的内容,如std::vector
。