使用最新版本的IZ3并运行cpp_example时,我遇到了段错误。
重现:
git clone https://git01.codeplex.com/z3
interp
:git checkout interp
README
cpp_example
:cd build ; make cpp_example
cpp_example
结果:
unsat core example 3
[1] 30687 segmentation fault ./cpp_example
如果我建立在cpp_example
上,master
对我有用。
我在2012年12月的一些邮件列表上看到一条消息,Z3的插值版本无法针对最新版本的Z3构建,但这是一项正在进行中的工作。
IZ3是否仍适用于Z3版本4?
如果是,是否有关于如何针对早期版本的Z3构建插值源的任何说明? (从:在哪里获取IZ3-3.2的源代码或其他什么?)
Linux __ 2.6.37.6-24-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT __ i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
克++:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.5/lto-wrapper
Target: i586-suse-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada --enable-checking=release --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.5 --enable-ssp --disable-libssp --disable-plugin --with-bugurl=http://bugs.opensuse.org/ --with-pkgversion='SUSE Linux' --disable-libgcj --disable-libmudflap --with-slibdir=/lib --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-libstdcxx-allocator=new --disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --program-suffix=-4.5 --enable-linux-futex --without-system-libunwind --enable-gold --with-plugin-ld=/usr/bin/gold --with-arch-32=i586 --with-tune=generic --build=i586-suse-linux
Thread model: posix
答案 0 :(得分:1)
正在崩溃的不满_核心 - 实例3()。
我将问题追溯到expr_substitution::find()
proofs_enabled()== false那里
但在rewriter_tpl<Config>::visit(expr * t, unsigned max_depth)
,
ProofGen == true,但是从调用'm_cfg.get_subst(t,new_t,new_t_pr)',new_t_pr是未初始化的。
valgrind有什么要说的:
==26885== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==26885== at 0x4C21802: bool rewriter_tpl<th_rewriter_cfg>::visit<true>(expr*, unsigned int) (ast.h:1562)
==26885== by 0x4C21A77: void rewriter_tpl<th_rewriter_cfg>::process_app<true>(app*, rewriter_core::frame&) (rewriter_def.h:179)
==26885== by 0x4C23303: void rewriter_tpl<th_rewriter_cfg>::resume_core<true>(obj_ref<expr, ast_manager>&, obj_ref<app, ast_manager>&) (rewriter_def.h:602)
==26885== by 0x4B1EF9C: propagate_values_tactic::imp::operator()(ref<goal> const&, sref_buffer<goal, 16u>&, ref<model_converter>&, ref<proof_converter>&, obj_ref<dependency_manager<ast_manager::expr_dependency_config>::dependency, ast_manager>&) (propagate_values_tactic.cpp:128)
==26885== by 0x4B21591: propagate_values_tactic::operator()(ref<goal> const&, sref_buffer<goal, 16u>&, ref<model_converter>&, ref<proof_converter>&, obj_ref<dependency_manager<ast_manager::expr_dependency_config>::dependency, ast_manager>&) (propagate_values_tactic.cpp:249)
==26885== by 0x4B8BA9A: cleanup_tactical::operator()(ref<goal> const&, sref_buffer<goal, 16u>&, ref<model_converter>&, ref<proof_converter>&, obj_ref<dependency_manager<ast_manager::expr_dependency_config>::dependency, ast_manager>&) (tactical.cpp:1192)
==26885== by 0x4B8ED2D: and_then_tactical::operator()(ref<goal> const&, sref_buffer<goal, 16u>&, ref<model_converter>&, ref<proof_converter>&, obj_ref<dependency_manager<ast_manager::expr_dependency_config>::dependency, ast_manager>&) (tactical.cpp:157)
==26885== by 0x4B90914: and_then_tactical::operator()(ref<goal> const&, sref_buffer<goal, 16u>&, ref<model_converter>&, ref<proof_converter>&, obj_ref<dependency_manager<ast_manager::expr_dependency_config>::dependency, ast_manager>&) (tactical.cpp:170)
==26885== by 0x4B8ED2D: and_then_tactical::operator()(ref<goal> const&, sref_buffer<goal, 16u>&, ref<model_converter>&, ref<proof_converter>&, obj_ref<dependency_manager<ast_manager::expr_dependency_config>::dependency, ast_manager>&) (tactical.cpp:157)
==26885== by 0x4B8ED2D: and_then_tactical::operator()(ref<goal> const&, sref_buffer<goal, 16u>&, ref<model_converter>&, ref<proof_converter>&, obj_ref<dependency_manager<ast_manager::expr_dependency_config>::dependency, ast_manager>&) (tactical.cpp:157)
==26885== by 0x4B90914: and_then_tactical::operator()(ref<goal> const&, sref_buffer<goal, 16u>&, ref<model_converter>&, ref<proof_converter>&, obj_ref<dependency_manager<ast_manager::expr_dependency_config>::dependency, ast_manager>&) (tactical.cpp:170)
==26885== by 0x4B94C1A: exec(tactic&, ref<goal> const&, sref_buffer<goal, 16u>&, ref<model_converter>&, ref<proof_converter>&, obj_ref<dependency_manager<ast_manager::expr_dependency_config>::dependency, ast_manager>&) (tactic.cpp:179)