Question

我正在学习Javascript中的继承，特别是： Parasitic Combination Inheritance ，来自Professional JS for Web Developers。我有3种方法将SuperType继承到Subtype 他们的行为完全相同。为什么？他们应该吗？我的直觉告诉我，我错过了一些东西

function inheritPrototype(subType, superType) {
    var prototype = object(superType.prototype);
    prototype.constructor = subType;
    subType.prototype = prototype;
}

function myInheritPrototype(subType, superType) {
    subType.prototype = Object.create(superType.prototype); // inherit methods
    subType.prototype.constructor = subType; // assign constructor
}

function myInheritPrototype2(subType, superType) {
    subType.prototype = superType.prototype; // inherit methods
    subType.prototype.constructor = subType; // assign constructor
}

这是辅助函数：

function object(o) {
    function F() {};
    F.prototype = o;
    return new F();
}

以下是使用上述3个inheritPrototype（）函数的代码：

function SuperType1(name) {
    this.name = name;
    this.colors = ["r", "g", "b"];
}

SuperType.prototype.sayName = function() {
    console.log(this.name);
}

function SubType(name, age) {
    SuperType.call(this, name); // inherit properties
    this.age = age;
}

// method inheritance happens only once
inheritPrototype(SubType, SuperType); // works
//myInheritPrototype(SubType, SuperType); // works
//myInheritPrototype2(SubType, SuperType); // also works, but should it?

SubType.prototype.sayAge = function() {
    console.log(this.age);
}

Answer 1

乍一看，第一个和第二个基本相同（object == Object.create）。在第三个函数中，subType.prototype和superType.prototype是同一个对象，因此SuperType的实例也将是SubType的实例：

function SuperType() {}
function SubType() {}

myInheritPrototype2(SubType, SuperType); 
console.log(new SuperType() instanceof SubType) // true

为什么这些所有这些Javascript原型继承方法似乎都一样？

1 个答案: