我一直在使用Task.Factory.FromAsync()方法,并且遇到了严重的内存泄漏。我使用过探查器,它表明很多物体在使用后似乎都在闲逛:
Heap shot 140 at 98.591 secs: size: 220177584, object count: 2803125, class count: 98, roots: 666
Bytes Count Average Class name
25049168 142325 175 System.Threading.Tasks.Task<System.Int32> (bytes: +398816, count: +2266)
1 root references (1 pinning)
142324 references from: System.Threading.Tasks.Task
142305 references from: System.Threading.Tasks.TaskCompletionSource<System.Int32>
98309 references from: task_test.Task3Test.<Run>c__AnonStorey1
25049024 142324 176 System.Threading.Tasks.Task (bytes: +398816, count: +2266)
142304 references from: System.Threading.Tasks.TaskContinuation
17078880 142324 120 System.Action<System.Threading.Tasks.Task<System.Int32>> (bytes: +271920, count: +2266)
142324 references from: System.Threading.Tasks.TaskActionInvoker.ActionTaskInvoke<System.Int32>
17076600 142305 120 System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.MonoMethodMessage (bytes: +271680, count: +2264)
1 root references (1 pinning)
142304 references from: System.MonoAsyncCall
17076584 142305 119 System.AsyncCallback (bytes: +271920, count: +2266)
1 root references (1 pinning)
142304 references from: System.MonoAsyncCall
17076584 142305 119 System.Func<System.Int32> (bytes: +271920, count: +2266)
1 root references (1 pinning)
142305 references from: System.Func<System.IAsyncResult,System.Int32>
142304 references from: System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.AsyncResult
1 references from: System.Func<System.AsyncCallback,System.Object,System.IAsyncResult>
17076584 142305 119 System.Func<System.IAsyncResult,System.Int32> (bytes: +271920, count: +2266)
1 root references (1 pinning)
142305 references from: System.Threading.Tasks.TaskFactory.<FromAsyncBeginEnd>c__AnonStorey3A<System.Int32>
17076480 142304 120 System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.AsyncResult (bytes: +271800, count: +2265)
98461 references from: System.Object[]
我正在尝试弄清楚可能/可能不会发生什么类型的事情,以防止gc识别该对象不再使用。 FromAsync返回一个Task对象,该对象是从TaskCompletionSource获得的,它有一个类变量“source”,它保存了Task从新的Task调用中获取的值。
这是测试用例。它还包括一个使用StartNew()的情况,其中内存使用没有爆炸。下面的初始Test3Task没有使用ContinueWith但是看看它是否是我们没有清理的东西我们把它放入(没有效果)。 [并且不,下面使用的监听变量是多余的 - 有计划使测试更加智能,但是永远做得同样好。]
using System;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace task_test
{
class MainClass
{
public static void Main (string[] args)
{
// Test3 - Leaky
var t = new Task3Test();
// Test4 - Doesn't leak
// var t = new Task4Test();
t.Run();
}
}
public class BaseTask
{
public int GetRandomInt(int top)
{
Random random = new Random();
return random.Next(1,top);
}
}
public class FibArgs
{
public byte[] data;
public int n;
}
public class Fib
{
public int Calculate(FibArgs args)
{
int n = args.n;
int a = 0;
int b = 1;
// In N steps compute Fibonacci sequence iteratively.
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
int temp = a;
a = b;
b = temp + b;
}
Console.WriteLine("ThreadId: {2}, fib({0}) = {1}", n, a, Thread.CurrentThread.GetHashCode());
return a;
}
}
public class Task3Test : BaseTask
{
public void Run()
{
bool listening = true;
long i = 0;
while (listening)
{
i++;
Func<int> fun = () => {
int n = GetRandomInt(100);
Fib f = new Fib();
FibArgs args = new FibArgs();
args.n = n;
return f.Calculate(args);
};
var t = Task<int>.Factory.FromAsync(fun.BeginInvoke, fun.EndInvoke, null);
t.ContinueWith( x => {
if (x.IsCompleted) {
x.Dispose();
x = null;
}
}
);
}
}
}
public class Task4Test : BaseTask
{
public void Run()
{
bool listening = true;
long i = 0;
while (listening)
{
int n = GetRandomInt(100);
Fib f = new Fib();
FibArgs args = new FibArgs();
args.n = n;
Task.Factory.StartNew(() => f.Calculate(args), TaskCreationOptions.LongRunning)
.ContinueWith(x => {
if(x.IsFaulted)
{
Console.WriteLine("OOPS, error!!!");
x.Exception.Handle(_ => true); //just an example, you'll want to handle properly
}
else if(x.IsCompleted)
{
Console.WriteLine("Cleaning up task {0}", x.Id);
x.Dispose();
}
}
);
}
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我很确定问题是你创建的任务比完成任务更快,所以他们排队。