在创建我需要的实际应用程序之前,我试图对此有一个基本的了解。我最近从2.7移到3.3。
this code from the python docs的直接复制粘贴失败,here中的一个稍微简单的示例失败。
这是我的代码,源自第二个例子:
import concurrent.futures
nums = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
def f(x):
return x * x
# Make sure the map and function are working
print([val for val in map(f, nums)])
# Test to make sure concurrent map is working
with concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor() as executor:
for item in executor.map(f, nums):
print(item)
这是输出:
[1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<string>", line 420, in run_nodebug
File "<module1>", line 13, in <module>
File "C:\Python33\lib\concurrent\futures\_base.py", line 546, in result_iterator
yield future.result()
File "C:\Python33\lib\concurrent\futures\_base.py", line 399, in result
return self.__get_result()
File "C:\Python33\lib\concurrent\futures\_base.py", line 351, in __get_result
raise self._exception
concurrent.futures.process.BrokenProcessPool: A process in the process pool was terminated abruptly while the future was running or pending.
如何让此代码按预期工作?我希望这些例子能够开箱即用。
答案 0 :(得分:17)
这是我的错,原因有两个:
if __name__
更正修复错误的 。
最终测试代码:
import concurrent.futures
nums = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
def f(x):
return x * x
def main():
# Make sure the map and function are working
print([val for val in map(f, nums)])
# Test to make sure concurrent map is working
with concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor() as executor:
print([val for val in executor.map(f, nums)])
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
按预期输出:
[1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100]
[1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100]
答案 1 :(得分:6)
在Windows下,保护代码的主循环非常重要,以避免在使用processpoolexecutor或产生新进程的任何其他并行代码时递归生成子进程。
基本上,创建新进程的所有代码都必须在{product_name}
之下,原因与您无法在解释器中执行它相同。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
这实际上在Windows上仍在发生。 我有Python 3.7.2,并尝试了以下文档中给出的示例 https://docs.python.org/3/library/concurrent.futures.html#concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor
即使示例已经从__name__ == '__main__'
下调用了新进程,该错误仍然会发生。
我在Windows 10和Windows 7上都尝试过。 它确实可以在MacOS Sierra的Mac上宣传。相同的python版本。