我们的:
our $ref = "test";
my $var = "ref";
print "$$var"; #the output will be test
我:
my $ref = "test";
my $var = "ref";
print "$$var\n"; #the output is blank
答案 0 :(得分:1)
不同之处在于our
会设置一个包变量,而my
会设置一个词法变量。
这意味着用our
声明的变量可以在当前范围之外访问。
use strict;
use warnings;
{
our $g = 5;
}
{
print our($g), "\n";
}
5
虽然词汇变量仅存在于给定范围内。
{
# stored in this block
my $l = 5;
{
# accessible from this block
print $l, "\n";
$l = 6;
# new variable stored in this lower block
my $l = 7;
}
print $l, "\n";
}
{
# yet another new variable
print my($l), "\n";
}
5
6
Use of uninitialized value $a in print at -e line 1.
当您尝试访问$$var
时,您使用的是symbolic reference;它只适用于包/全局变量:
our $g = 5;
my $symbolic_ref = 'g';
{
no strict 'refs';
# these are symbolic refs
print $$symbolic_ref, "\n";
print ${ *{$symbolic_ref} }, "\n";
print ${ *{$symbolic_ref}{SCALAR} }, "\n";
}
# access it through the magic %:: variable
print ${ $::{$symbolic_ref} }, "\n";
print ${ $main::{$symbolic_ref} }, "\n";
5
5
5
5
5
这与regular references相反。
my $v = 5;
my $ref = \$v;
print $$ref, "\n";
print ${ $ref }, "\n";
5
5
很少有理由使用symbolic reference。