我有这个prolog问题我无法解决。我想要实现的是断言FACT A,当我输入时收回事实B:当我输入put时,取得并断言事实B并收回事实A.
即:
:- dynamic s/2.
:- dynamic s/3.
s(P0, s(V, NP)) --> v(P1, V), np(P2, NP), {P0 is P1*P2*0.35}.
s(P0, s(V, NP, PP)) --> v(P1, V), np(P2, NP), pp(P3, PP), {P0 is P1*P2*P3*0.65}.
s(P0, s(V, NP)) --> v(P1, V), np(P2, NP), {V == take -> P0 is P1*P2*0.35; P0 is 0}.
s(P0, s(V, NP, PP)) --> v(P1, V), np(P2, NP), pp(P3, PP), {V == put -> P0 is P1*P2*P3*0.65; P0 is 0}.
np(P0, np(D, N)) --> det(P1, D), n(P2, N), {P0 is P1*P2*0.36}.
np(P0, np(D, A, N)) --> det(P1, D), a(P2, A), n(P3, N), {P0 is P1*P2*P3*0.46}.
np(P0, np(D, N, PP)) --> det(P1, D), n(P2, N), pp(P3, PP), {P0 is P1*P2*P3*0.13}.
np(P0, np(D, A, N, PP)) --> det(P1, D), a(P2, A), n(P3, N), pp(P4, PP), {P0 is P1*P2*P3*P4*0.05}.
pp(P0, pp(P, NP)) --> p(P1, P), np(P2, NP), {P0 is P1*P2*1.0}.
v(0.65, v(put)) --> {retract(s(V, NP))}, [put].
v(0.35, v(take)) --> {retract(s(V, NP, PP))}, [take].
n(0.23, n(block)) --> [block].
n(0.25, n(circle)) --> [circle].
n(0.15, n(cone)) --> [cone].
n(0.12, n(cube)) --> [cube].
n(0.25, n(square)) --> [square].
a(0.56, a(blue)) --> [blue].
a(0.27, a(green)) --> [green].
a(0.17, a(red)) --> [red].
det(1.0, det(the)) --> [the].
p(1.0, p(on)) --> [on].
我无法让它发挥作用:任何帮助都会受到赞赏。
编辑:发布的所有代码
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我怀疑问题出在代码的其他地方。这对SWI来说很有用:
:- dynamic s/1.
foo --> "hello", { retractall(s(_)), asserta(s(hi)) }.
foo --> "goodbye", { retractall(s(_)), asserta(s(bye)) }.
例如:
?- s(X).
false.
?- phrase(foo, "hello").
true .
?- phrase(foo, "hello").
true ;
false.
?- s(X).
X = hi.
?- phrase(foo, "goodbye").
true.
?- s(X).
X = bye.
我很好奇为什么你这样做。在所有条件相同的情况下,我倾向于使用您声称的信息来增加您生成的AST。然后,我对动态商店有偏见。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
我不完全理解您的代码,但我有一种感觉:
v(0.65, v(put)) --> {retract(s(V, NP))}, [put].
v(0.35, v(take)) --> {retract(s(V, NP, PP))}, [take].
应该是:
v(0.65, v(put)) --> [put], {retract(s(V, NP))}.
v(0.35, v(take)) --> [take], {retract(s(V, NP, PP))}.
但是,为什么V
,NP
,PP
未实例化?如果要删除所有出现的内容,请使用retractall/1
;如果只有一次出现我建议使用swipl's global variables。在任何情况下,通过在DCG中使用副作用就像对付魔鬼一样;我是在我的编译器中完成的,这是一个让人痛苦的地狱XD
答案 2 :(得分:1)
这是我最终做的事情,我使用约束来选择某个规则而不是另一个规则: 这是代码:
s(P0, s(V, NP)) --> v(P1, V), np(P2, NP), {P0 is P1*P2*0.35, V == v(take)}.
s(P0, s(V, NP, PP)) --> v(P1, V), np(P2, NP), pp(P3, PP), {P0 is P1*P2*P3*0.65, V == v(put)}.
np(P0, np(D, N)) --> det(P1, D), n(P2, N), {P0 is P1*P2*0.36}.
np(P0, np(D, A, N)) --> det(P1, D), a(P2, A), n(P3, N), {P0 is P1*P2*P3*0.46}.
np(P0, np(D, N, PP)) --> det(P1, D), n(P2, N), pp(P3, PP), {P0 is P1*P2*P3*0.13}.
np(P0, np(D, A, N, PP)) --> det(P1, D), a(P2, A), n(P3, N), pp(P4, PP), {P0 is P1*P2*P3*P4*0.05}.
pp(P0, pp(P, NP)) --> p(P1, P), np(P2, NP), {P0 is P1*P2*1.0, NP \= np(_, _ , _, _)}.
v(0.65, v(put)) --> [put].
v(0.35, v(take)) --> [take].
n(0.23, n(block)) --> [block].
n(0.25, n(circle)) --> [circle].
n(0.15, n(cone)) --> [cone].
n(0.12, n(cube)) --> [cube].
n(0.25, n(square)) --> [square].
a(0.56, a(blue)) --> [blue].
a(0.27, a(green)) --> [green].
a(0.17, a(red)) --> [red].
det(1.0, det(the)) --> [the].
p(1.0, p(on)) --> [on].