java.awt.Robot线程无法停止/销毁?

时间:2012-11-22 20:32:38

标签: java thread-safety awtrobot

我使用java.awt.Robot制作了桌面远程控制应用程序,并且工作正常。 应用程序集成在另一个应用程序系统中,所以我希望能够从外部系统启动/停止远程控制,我发现了奇怪的问题 - 我无法阻止机器人。

我尝试了几件事:在线程内运行它(所以我可以停止线程),使机器人对象为null而不是调用System.gc()但问题不是引用它的机器人线程仍在运行(毕竟其他人被摧毁)。 在调试中我可以看到正在运行的线程:守护进程线程[AWT-Windows](正在运行)。

以下代码将重现我的问题:

public class RobotDestroy {

  public static void main(String[] args) {

    try {
        Robot r = new Robot();
    } catch (AWTException e) {
        e.printStackTrace();
    }

    }

}

有没有人见过类似的东西? 任何解决方案?

感谢

修改

以下是在一个线程中运行Robot的示例,该线程可以停止但是Robot实例仍在运行:

public class RobotDestroy {

public static void main(String[] args) {

    RobotThread rt = new RobotThread();
    rt.start(); 

    try {
        //do some work before thread shut down
        Thread.sleep(5000);
    } catch (InterruptedException e) {
        e.printStackTrace();
    }

    rt.shutdown();          
}

private static class RobotThread extends Thread {

    public Robot robot;
    volatile boolean alive;

    public RobotThread(){
        try {
            this.robot = new Robot();
            this.alive = true;
        } catch (AWTException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }

    public void run(){

        while(alive){
            System.out.println("alive");
            try{
                robot.delay(5000);
                sleep(1000);

            }catch(Exception e){
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }           
    }

    public void shutdown(){
        this.alive = false;
        robot = null;
        System.out.println("shutdown");
    }       
}

}

编辑2

我尝试了医生杀手的建议,虽然这是一个很好的建议机器人线程仍在运行。证明它的最佳方法是在创建机器人实例之前和之后打印出线程:

    Set<Thread> threadSet = Thread.getAllStackTraces().keySet();
    Thread[] threadArray = threadSet.toArray(new Thread[threadSet.size()]);

    for (int i = 0; i < threadArray.length; i++) {
        System.out.println(threadArray[i].getName());
    }

更新 经过大量的调试后,我意识到问题不在java.awt.Robot类中 - 它是java.awt.Toolkit,它启动应用程序结束后仍在运行的AWT-Window线程。 Robot对象有RobotPeer(java.awt.peer.RobotPeer),它返回:((ComponentFactory)工具包).createRobot(this,screen);

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:0)

通常你会在接收远程事件的线程的while(true)循环中放置一个标志,这样你就会有类似while(isAlive)...读远程事件...如果远程事件断开你的话离开循环,机器人不再获得命令。

机器人仍然活着,因为你的程序一直在调用它......你的停止循环

还在RobotThread中包含此内容

import java.awt.AWTException;
import java.awt.Robot;
import java.util.LinkedList;

public class RobotDestroy {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        //Set<Thread> threadSet = Thread.getAllStackTraces().keySet(); Thread[] threadArray = threadSet.toArray(new Thread[threadSet.size()]); for (int i = 0; i < threadArray.length; i++) { System.out.println("Init " + threadArray[i].getName()); }
        RobotThread rt = new RobotThread();
        rt.start(); 

        // Listen to the upcomming commands...and push them to the RobotThread

        rt.shutdown();          
    }

    private static class RobotThread extends Thread {

        public Robot robot;

        public RobotThread(){
            try {
                this.robot = new Robot();
            } catch (AWTException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
        }

        public void run(){
            Command currentCommand = getNextCommand();
            while(currentCommand.getType() != CommandType.KILL){
                // Process the command no sleep...
                // ...
                // ...

                currentCommand = getNextCommand();
            }

            System.out.println("DIED ");
        }

        private LinkedList<Command> commands = new LinkedList<Command>();

        enum CommandType {
            KILL,
            DO_SOMETHING
        }

        private synchronized Command getNextCommand() {
            while(commands.isEmpty()) {
                try {
                    System.out.println("WAITING");
                    wait();
                } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                    e.printStackTrace();
                }
            }
            return commands.removeFirst();
        }

        public synchronized void pushCommand(Command comm) {
            commands.addLast(comm);
            notify();
        }

        public synchronized void shutdown(){
            commands.clear();
            pushCommand(new Command(CommandType.KILL));
            System.out.println("shutdown");
            //Set<Thread> threadSet = Thread.getAllStackTraces().keySet(); Thread[] threadArray = threadSet.toArray(new Thread[threadSet.size()]); for (int i = 0; i < threadArray.length; i++) { System.out.println("End " + threadArray[i].getName()); }
        }  

        class Command {
            private CommandType cmdType;
            public Command(CommandType type) {
                this.cmdType = type;
            }
            public CommandType getType() { return cmdType; }
        }
    }
}