Question

我有一个使用表值函数的存储过程，该函数在9秒内执行。如果我更改了表值函数并删除了where子句，则存储过程将在3秒内执行。如果我添加where子句，查询仍然会在3秒内执行。

我看了一下执行计划，看来我删除了where子句后，执行计划包括并行性，我的2个表的扫描计数下降为50000和65000下降到5和3.我添加后在where子句中，优化的执行计划仍然运行，除非我运行DBCC FREEPROCCACHE。

问题 1.为什么只有在我第一次删除where子句时，SQL Server才开始对两个查询使用优化的执行计划？

有没有办法强制SQL Server使用此执行计划？

此外，这是一个参数化的一体化查询，它在where子句中使用（参数为null或参数），我认为这对性能不利。

RETURNS TABLE 
AS
RETURN 
(
SELECT  TOP (@PageNumber * @PageSize)
                CASE
                    WHEN @SortOrder = 'Expensive' THEN ROW_NUMBER()     OVER (ORDER BY SellingPrice DESC)
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'Inexpensive' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY SellingPrice ASC)                  
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'LowMiles' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Mileage ASC)
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'HighMiles' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Mileage DESC)
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'Closest' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY P1.Distance ASC)       
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'Newest' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [Year] DESC)    
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'Oldest' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [Year] ASC)                     
                ELSE ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY InventoryID ASC)
            END as rn,
            P1.InventoryID,
            P1.SellingPrice,
            P1.Distance,
            P1.Mileage,
            Count(*) OVER () RESULT_COUNT,
            dimCarStatus.[year]
    FROM    (SELECT InventoryID, SellingPrice, Zip.Distance, Mileage, ColorKey, CarStatusKey, CarKey FROM facInventory
                JOIN @ZipCodes Zip
                ON   Zip.DealerKey = facInventory.DealerKey) as P1
    JOIN    dimColor
            ON dimColor.ColorKey = P1.ColorKey
    JOIN    dimCarStatus
            ON dimCarStatus.CarStatusKey = P1.CarStatusKey  
    JOIN    dimCar
            ON dimCar.CarKey = P1.CarKey                        
    WHERE
            (@ExteriorColor is NULL OR dimColor.ExteriorColor like @ExteriorColor) AND
            (@InteriorColor is NULL OR dimColor.InteriorColor like @InteriorColor) AND
            (@Condition is NULL OR dimCarStatus.Condition like @Condition) AND
            (@Year is NULL OR dimCarStatus.[Year] like @Year) AND
            (@Certified is NULL OR dimCarStatus.Certified like @Certified) AND
            (@Make is NULL OR dimCar.Make like @Make) AND
            (@ModelCategory is NULL OR dimCar.ModelCategory like @ModelCategory) AND    
            (@Model is NULL OR dimCar.Model like @Model) AND
            (@Trim is NULL OR dimCar.Trim like @Trim) AND
            (@BodyType is NULL OR dimCar.BodyType like @BodyType) AND
            (@VehicleTypeCode is NULL OR dimCar.VehicleTypeCode like @VehicleTypeCode) AND
            (@MinPrice is NULL OR P1.SellingPrice >= @MinPrice) AND
            (@MaxPrice is NULL OR P1.SellingPrice < @MaxPrice) AND
            (@Mileage is NULL OR P1.Mileage < @Mileage)
    ORDER   BY
            CASE
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'Expensive' THEN -SellingPrice
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'Inexpensive' THEN SellingPrice 
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'LowMiles' THEN Mileage
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'HighMiles' THEN -Mileage
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'Closest' THEN P1.Distance        
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'Newest' THEN -[YEAR]
                WHEN @SortOrder = 'Oldest' THEN [YEAR]                  
                ELSE InventoryID 
            END
)

Answer 1

问题1：SQL服务器仍然继续使用对没有where子句的语句有效的执行计划。基本上SQL Server认为where子句不存在。

问题2：使用OPTION（USE PLAN N''）文章：http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc917694.aspx

个人推荐：

更改查询，以便至少有一个必需的过滤器并将其编入索引。或
将其更改为动态，并动态应用过滤器。文章：http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms188001.aspx

希望这有帮助。

执行计划优化何时删除where子句然后添加回来

1 个答案: