这两个定义之间有什么区别?:
def sayTwords(word1: String, word2: String) = println(word1 + " " + word2)
def sayTwords2(word1: String)(word2: String) = println(word1 + " " + word2)
每个人的目的是什么?
答案 0 :(得分:4)
第二个是咖喱,第一个不是。有关您可能选择咖喱方法的讨论,请参阅What's the rationale behind curried functions in Scala?
答案 1 :(得分:3)
sayTwords2
允许部分应用该方法。
val sayHelloAnd = sayTwords2("Hello")
sayHelloAnd("World!")
sayHaelloAnd("Universe!")
注意你也可以用同样的方式使用第一个功能。
val sayHelloAnd = sayTwords("Hello", _:String)
sayHelloAnd("World!")
sayHelloAnd("Universe!")
答案 2 :(得分:1)
def sayTwords(word1: String, word2: String) = println(word1 + " " + word2)
def sayTwords2(word1: String)(word2: String) = println(word1 + " " + word2)
第一个包含单个参数列表。第二个包含多个参数列表。
他们在以下方面有所不同:
部分应用程序语法。观察:
scala> val f = sayTwords("hello", _: String)
f: String => Unit = <function1>
scala> f("world")
hello world
scala> val g = sayTwords2("hello") _
g: String => Unit = <function1>
scala> g("world")
hello world
前者具有位置语法的好处。因此,您可以在任何位置部分应用参数。
类型推断。 Scala中的类型推断按参数列表工作,并从左到右。因此,考虑到一个案例,人们可能会促进更好的类型推断。观察:
scala> def unfold[A, B](seed: B, f: B => Option[(A, B)]): Seq[A] = {
| val s = Seq.newBuilder[A]
| var x = seed
| breakable {
| while (true) {
| f(x) match {
| case None => break
| case Some((r, x0)) => s += r; x = x0
| }
| }
| }
| s.result
| }
unfold: [A, B](seed: B, f: B => Option[(A, B)])Seq[A]
scala> unfold(11, x => if (x == 0) None else Some((x, x - 1)))
<console>:18: error: missing parameter type
unfold(11, x => if (x == 0) None else Some((x, x - 1)))
^
scala> unfold(11, (x: Int) => if (x == 0) None else Some((x, x - 1)))
res7: Seq[Int] = List(11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)
scala> def unfold[A, B](seed: B)(f: B => Option[(A, B)]): Seq[A] = {
| val s = Seq.newBuilder[A]
| var x = seed
| breakable {
| while (true) {
| f(x) match {
| case None => break
| case Some((r, x0)) => s += r; x = x0
| }
| }
| }
| s.result
| }
unfold: [A, B](seed: B)(f: B => Option[(A, B)])Seq[A]
scala> unfold(11)(x => if (x == 0) None else Some((x, x - 1)))
res8: Seq[Int] = List(11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)