我有一个LinkedList的ADT测试代码,它实现了NumList.java接口,并在NumLinkedList.java中实现,并在NumSet.java中使用它。
我正在努力使我的NumSet具有可以从双数组输入创建集合的方法,并使用intercept / union和print方法来使用和打印数据。
但我的测试代码显示我的测试NumSet值为空,即testProof和testProof2。
所以现在我的testProof返回一个空变量,这意味着什么都没有保存到它。
static public NumSet intersect(NumSet S1, NumSet S2) //check 2nd for and if//
{
NumSet intersectAnswer = new NumSet();
for (int i = 0; i < S1.set.size()-1; i++)
{
for(int j = 0; j < S2.set.size()-1; j++)
{
double FUZZ = 0.0001;
if (Math.abs(S1.set.lookup(i) - S2.set.lookup(j)) < FUZZ) // double values, this is more precise than ==.
{
intersectAnswer.set.insert(1, S1.set.lookup(i));
}
}
}
return intersectAnswer;
}
是testProof的方法,以下是定义testProof的地方。
public static void main(String[] args)
{
double[] a = {1.3,2,3,4,101.9};
double[] b = {3,7,13,901,-29.1,0.05};
NumArrayList test;
test = new NumArrayList();
test.printTest(); //runs test code in NumList
//ok below is running. what is wrong with intersect?
NumSet test2;
test2 = new NumSet(a);
NumSet test4;
test4 = new NumSet(b);
NumSet testProof;
NumSet testProof2;
test2.print(); //print out test 2
System.out.println();
test4.print();
System.out.println();
testProof = intersect(test2,test4);
我已初始化为
public class NumSet
{
private NumList set;
public NumSet(double[] sth)
{
//moves elements of sth into set.
set = new NumLinkedList();
for(int i = 0; i < sth.length; i++)
{
set.insert(0,sth[i]);
}
set.removeDuplicates();
}
public NumSet()
{
set = new NumLinkedList();
}
int numSet = 0;
我的拦截,联合和打印如下:
public NumSet intersect(NumSet S1, NumSet S2) //check 2nd for and if//
{
NumSet intersectAnswer = new NumSet();
for (int i = 0; i < S1.set.size()-1; i++)
{
for(int j = 0; j < S2.set.size()-1; j++)
{
if (S1.set.lookup(i) == S2.set.lookup(j))
{
intersectAnswer.set.insert(0, S1.set.lookup(i));
}
}
}
// intersectAnswer.set.removeDuplicates(); unnecessary, sets are already removed of duplicates
return intersectAnswer;
}
public NumSet union(NumSet S1, NumSet S2)
{ //check logic.
NumSet unionAnswer = new NumSet();
for (int i = 1; i < S1.set.size()+1; i++)
{
unionAnswer.set.insert(1, S1.set.lookup(i));
}
for (int i = 1; i < S2.set.size()+1; i++)
{
unionAnswer.set.insert(1, S2.set.lookup(i));
}
unionAnswer.set.removeDuplicates();
return unionAnswer;
}
public void print()
{
for (int i = 0; i < set.size()-1; i++)
{
System.out.print(set.lookup(i) + ",");
}
System.out.print(set.lookup(set.size()-1));
}
查询和大小是从我的NumLinkedList.java引用的,如下所示
public int size() // measure size of list by counting counter++;
{
return nItem;
}
public double lookup(int i)
{
if( i <0 || i >= size()) //cannot lookup nonexistant object
{
System.out.println("out of bounds " + i + " < 0 or > " + size() );
//how do I break out of this loop?
System.out.println("just returning 0 for the sake of the program");
return 0;
}
if(i == 0)
{
return head.value;
}
double answer = 0;
Node currNode = head;
for(int j = 0; j < i+1; j++) //move to ith node and save value
{
answer = currNode.value;
currNode = currNode.next;
}
return answer;
}
最后我的测试代码如下,其中testProof和testProof2是。
public static void main(String[] args)
{
double[] a = {1.3,2,3,4,101.9};
double[] b = {3,7,13,901,-29.1,0.05};
NumArrayList test;
test = new NumArrayList();
test.printTest(); //runs test code in NumList
//ok below is running. what is wrong with intersect?
NumSet test2;
test2 = new NumSet(a);
NumSet test4;
test4 = new NumSet(b);
NumSet testProof;
NumSet testProof2;
test2.print();
System.out.println();
testProof = test2.intersect(test2, test4);
System.out.println("tried intersect");
testProof.print();
System.out.println();
System.out.println("tried test.print()");
testProof2 = test2.union(test2,test4);
System.out.println("tried union");
testProof2.print();
System.out.println();
System.out.println("NumSet ran fully.");
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我建议您在调试时使用整数值而不是 double values 来实现NumSet类,因为比较两个double值会给代码增加一些不必要的复杂性在这个调试阶段。
您可能希望查看 removeDuplicates()方法,我认为这可能会解决您的问题。不幸的是,我没有在你发布的代码中看到它。
实际上, intersect()方法中的这部分代码注定要从一开始就失败,
if (S1.set.lookup(i) == S2.set.lookup(j))
由于你使用了双精度数,==是比较两个不同值的非常不精确的方法,更好的方法是允许一定量的精度误差,即
double final FUZZ = 0.0001
if (Math.abs(S1.set.lookup(i) - S2.set.lookup(j)) < FUZZ )
//...