实施特定的排序算法,我遇到了一个问题,即使谷歌不想帮我...首先关于算法的一些话:
狮子的分享是将输入(数组)划分为三个部分:挑选两个关键数字(红色和蓝色,断言红色< =蓝色),分区的元素将(1)小于两者,( 2)在两者之间的某处和(3)比两个枢轴都大。这是工作正常的部分!
应该递归地对数组进行排序:在对分区进行分区之前使用任意枢轴对输入进行分区,从而最终得到长度为1或2的粒子,这些粒子按照def进行排序。或者更确切地说,可以很容易地分类。
问题是现在长度为> = 3的分区由一个键值组成:如果再次分区,无论选择哪个枢轴,所有元素都会在之后放入同一个分区,最终运行进入堆栈溢出。 这就是为什么我想到你能够帮助我,,因为我确信有一个解决方案。
强制性JavaCode代码段:分区 - 对于德语调试感到遗憾,也懒得翻译它。 IntTuple只能容纳两个整数;没什么太荒谬的。
public static IntTuple partition(int[] E, int left, int right, int red, int blue){
if (red > blue) {
int v = red;
red = blue;
blue = v;
}
System.out.println("Partition Eingabe: " + Arrays.toString(E) + " Links=" + left + " Rechts=" + right + " Rot=" + red + " Blau=" + blue);
/*
* Es gilt r <= b, also gilt für beliebige x...
* ... x < r => x < b
* ... x > b => x > r.
*
* Das Gerüst für diesen Algorithmus wurde kopiert von Folie 7-13
*/
IntTuple result = new IntTuple (left, right); // rote und blaue Regionen sind leer
int u = left; // weiße Region ist leer, die unbekannte == E[left...right]
while (u <= result.v2) {
System.out.print("E[" + u + "]: ");
if (E[u] < red) {
System.out.print("rot ");
swap(E, result.v1, u);
result.v1++; // vergrößere die rote Region
u++; // verkleinere die unbekannte Region
} else if ((E[u] >= red) && (E[u] <= blue)) {
System.out.print("weiß ");
u++; // verkleinere die unbekannte Region
} else if (E[u] > blue) {
System.out.print("blau ");
swap(E, result.v2, u);
result.v2--; // vergrößere die blaue Region
}
System.out.print("Partition Schritt: [");
for(int i = left; i < right; i++)
System.out.print("" + E[i] + " ");
System.out.println("" + E[right] + "]");
}
System.out.print("Partition Ausgabe: [");
for(int i = left; i < right; i++)
System.out.print("" + E[i] + " ");
System.out.println("" + E[right] + "]" + " RotG=" + result.v1 + " BlauG=" + result.v2);
return result;
}
强制性JavaCode代码段:排序
private static void flagSort(int[] E, int left, int right){
System.out.println("Sortiere: " + left + " bis " + right);
if(left < right - 1) {
Random rnd = new Random();
IntTuple v = partition(E, left, right, rnd.nextInt(50), rnd.nextInt(50));
//IntTuple v = partition(E, left, right, E[left], E[left + 1]);
flagSort(E, left, v.v1 - 1);
flagSort(E, v.v1, v.v2);
flagSort(E, v.v2 + 1, right);
} else if((left == right - 1) && (E[left] > E[right])) {
swap(E, left, right);
}
}
非常感谢任何想法!
问候,LDer
更多:我想出了这个hacky and awkward解决方案:
private static void flagSort(int[] E, int left, int right, boolean dual){
if(left < right) { // Singleton or empty segments are already sorted!
IntTuple v;
if(dual) // The last step has produced only a single white partition.
// Treat this partition with double pivot
v = partition(E, left, right, E[left], E[left]);
else // The last step has produced more than one partition, go on normally.
v = partition(E, left, right, E[left], E[left + 1]);
// Analyze partitions
if((left != v.v1) || (right != v.v2)) {
// 2 or 3 partitions available. Descend further.
flagSort(E, left, v.v1 - 1, false);
flagSort(E, v.v1, v.v2, false);
flagSort(E, v.v2 + 1, right, false);
} else if(!dual) {
// Only the white partition is not empty, partition it with double pivot
flagSort(E, v.v1, v.v2, true);
} // Last case: The only not-empty partition is white after partitioning with double pivot.
// Description of the algorithm immediately implies that this consists of only one key value, thus is sorted.
}
}
任何人都可以帮助创建更易读的版本吗?
更多:这个看起来更好:
private static void flagSort(int[] E, int left, int right, int offset){
if(left < right) { // Singleton or empty segments are already sorted!
IntTuple v = partition(E, left, right, E[left], E[left + offset]);
// Analyze partitions
if ((left != v.v1) || (right != v.v2)) {
// 2 or 3 partitions available. Descend further.
flagSort(E, left, v.v1 - 1, 1);
flagSort(E, v.v1, v.v2, 1);
flagSort(E, v.v2 + 1, right, 1);
} else if (offset > 0)
// Only the white partition is not empty, partition it with double pivot
flagSort2(E, v.v1, v.v2, 0);
// Last case: The only not-empty partition is white after partitioning with double pivot.
// Description of the algorithm immediately implies that this consists of only one key value, thus is sorted.
}
}
特别感谢toto2,即使我没有明确地传递红色/蓝色!
更多:更多随机性,因为toto2再次完全有一点:
private static void flagSort(int[] E, int left, int right, int offset){
if(left < right) {
IntTuple v = partition(E, left, right, E[left + (offset % (right - left))],
E[left + ((2 * offset) % (right - left))]);
if ((left != v.v1) || (right != v.v2)) {
int random = rnd.nextInt(right - left);
flagSort(E, left, v.v1 - 1, random);
flagSort(E, v.v1, v.v2, random);
flagSort(E, v.v2 + 1, right, random);
} else if (offset > 0)
flagSort(E, v.v1, v.v2, 0);
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
每次调用分区方法时,都会发生一件简单的事情: 蓝色和红色索引的项目正是它们所属的位置。 所以,当你调用这部分代码时:
flagSort(E, left, v.v1 - 1);
flagSort(E, v.v1, v.v2);
flagSort(E, v.v2 + 1, right);
这些来电不得包含蓝色和红色, 换句话说:
flagSort(E, left, v.v1 - 1);
flagSort(E, v.v1 +1 , v.v2 -1);
flagSort(E, v.v2 + 1, right);
答案 1 :(得分:0)
IntTuple v = partition(E, left, right, rnd.nextInt(50), rnd.nextInt(50));
50?您知道当前分区的最小 - 最大(红 - 蓝)值,这是一个比0-49更窄的范围。您应该修改flagSort,这样您不仅可以传递左右值,还可以传递红蓝色值。
如果使用red == blue调用flagSort,则可以返回,因为子数组具有相同的值并且已经排序。