针对表归档程序为此项目设计模式建议

时间:2012-04-27 09:24:53

标签: design-patterns architecture

所以我有以下项目要完成。我还没决定如何设计它。会喜欢一些建议。

它基本上是一个表归档器。 Givend需要在另一个地方导出这些行的特定条件。 这个地方可能是另一个数据库或(s)ftp服务器。 如果您选择数据库,则每次达到某个限制时都需要创建一个表(例如每个表不超过50k行),如果您选择一个(s)ftp服务器,那么您需要编写一个CSV或XML并将其放入在那里存档。

所以我们有这些组合:

  1. sql2CustomerSql
  2. sql2Oursql(为此我们已经上课,用于连接和获取一些基于系统配置的信息)
  3. csv2ftp
  4. csv2sftp
  5. xml2ftp
  6. xml2sftp
  7. 现在,我看到了所有地方的AbstractFactory模式,但基于什么? 我的想法是我应该有SQLWriter,XMLWriter,CSVWriter,它继承了一个抽象的Writer类,它实现了一些常见的策略,如计算行,获取常见的配置参数等...... 我应该为Connection类/接口做同样的事情(因为sql和(s)ftp真的不同吗?

    如果您需要更多信息,请询问。

3 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

听起来你正走在正确的道路上。

您应该避免创建作为Writer和Connection组合的类,而是创建某种包含Writer接口和Connection接口(作为属性)的Manager类。然后创建每个的适当实现并将它们传递给Manager。

这是战略设计模式的经典用法。

修改:添加代码示例。您应该添加适当的错误检查。

class Writer
{
public:
    virtual void output(cons std::string &data) = 0;
};

class Format
{
public:
    virtual std::string serialize() = 0;
};

// Create concrete Writer and Format classes here

class OutputManager
{
public:
    // Notice there should be no Writer, Format creation logic here,
    // This class should focus on orchestrating the output
    OutputManager() : writer_(NULL), format_(NULL) {}
    OutputManager(Writer *w, Format *f) : writer_(w), format_(f) {}

    void setWriter(Writer *w) { writer_ = w; }
    Writer *getWriter()       { return writer_; }

    void setFormat(Format *f) { format_ = f; }
    Format *getFormat()       { return format_; }

    // Maybe this should have a different return type
    void doOutput()
    {
        // Not sure what else you would need here,
        // but this is an example usage
        writer_->output(format_->serialize());
    }

private:
    Writer *writer_;
    Format *format_;
};

//
// And now the factories
//
class OutputAbstractFactory
{
public:
    OutputAbstractFactory(Config *c) config_(c) {}
    void createFactories()
    {
        writerFactory_ = WriterAbstractFactory::getWriterFactory(config_);
        formatFactory_ = FormatAbstractFactory::getFormatFactory(config_);
    }

    Writer *getWriter() { return writerFactory_->getWriter(); }
    Format *getFormat() { return formatFactory_->getFormat(); }

private:
    WriterAbstractFactory *writerFactory_;
    FormatAbstractFactory *formatFactory_;
    Config *config_;
}

class WriterAbstractFactory
{
public:
    // Config is a class you will have to make with 
    // the info detailing the Writer and Format stuff
    static WriterAbstractFactory *getWriterFactory(Config *c);
    virtual Writer *getWriter() = 0;
};

class FormatAbstractFactory
{
public:
    // Config is a class you will have to make with
    // the info detailing the Writer and Format stuff
    static FormatAbstractFactory *getFormatFactory(Config *c);
    virtual Format *getFormat() = 0;
};

// Create concrete factories here

//
// And this ties it all together
//
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    Config c;
    // populate Config accordingly

    OutputAbstractFactory *factory(&c);
    factory.createFactories();

    Writer *w = factory->getWriter();
    Format *f = factory->getFormat();
    // Do whatever else you need to with the Writer/Format here

    OutputManager om(w, f);
    // Do whatever else you need with the OutputManager here
    om.doOutput();
}

答案 1 :(得分:0)

您可能希望获得Modern C++ Design的副本,以获取有关如何制作基于策略的通用转换工具的建议。下面是一个非常粗略的骨架,它在两个策略上进行参数化:格式和连接。

template
<
    typename FormatPolicy,    // SQL, XML, CSV, provides row, config functionality
    typename ConnectionPolicy // SQL, FTP, provides open/close/read/write functionality
>
class ConversionTool
: 
    public FormatPolicy,
    public ConnectionPolicy
{
public:
    // your conversion interface here
    void operator()( /* your input */, /* your output */);
};

class SQLFormat { // SQL specific stuff } ;
class SQLConnection { // SQL specific stuff };

typedef ConversionTool<SQLFormat, SQLConnection> SQL2OurCustomerSQL;
SQL2OurCustomerSQL()(in_file, out_file); // for elsewhere declared in_file / out_file

答案 2 :(得分:0)

您正在处理两个问题。一种是格式,另一种是持久化的目的地。对于格式,您需要序列化器,对于目的地,您需要适配器。 SqlSerializer,XMLserializer。 SQLDestination,FTPDestination atc。

伪代码看起来像:

  • Destination.persist(new Serializer(SourceData));
  • Destination.persist(Serializer.transform(SourceData));
  • new Destination(new Serializer(SourceData))。persist();

    interface DataSerializer{
        String serialize();
    }
    
    class SqlSerializer implements DataSerializer {
        final Object rawData;
    
        SqlSerializer(Object rawData) {
            this.rawData = rawData;
        }
    
        String serialize() {
            // SQL Serialization Logic
        }
    }
    
    class XmlSerializer implements DataSerializer {
        final Object rawData;
    
        XmlSerializer(Object rawData) {
           this.rawData = rawData;
        }
    
        String serialize() {
            // XML Serialization Logic
        }
    }
    
    interface Destination {
        void persist(DataSerializer dataSerializer);
    }
    
    class SqlDestination implements Destination {
        final String username;
        ...
        ...
    
        SqlDestination(String username, String password, String url) {
            this.username = username;
            ...
            ...
        }
    
        void persist(DataSerializer dataSerializer) {
            // open SQL connection
            String = dataSerialize.serialize();
            // do sqlPersistanceLogic
        }
    }
    
    class FtpDestination implements Destination {
        final String username;
        ...
        ...
    
        FtpDestination(String username, String password, String url) {
            this.username = username;
            ...
            ...
        }
    
        void persist(DataSerializer dataSerializer) {
            // open FTP session connection
            String = dataSerialize.serialize();
            // send to ftpDestination
        }
    }
    
    Call:
    
    Destination dest = getApropriateDestination();
    dest.persist(new XmlSerializer(rawData));
    

您还可以实现逻辑以验证特定Destination的受支持序列化程序,或者如果目标和序列化程序之间存在1:1关系,则可以使用模板化。但我不知道它在C ++中是怎么回事;

根据您使用的工具和框架,您可以实施三种提取方式之一。原则仍然存在