我可以在穆斯这样做吗?
package SomeClass;
use Moose;
has start => (
isa => 'Int',
is => 'ro',
lazy => 1,
default => sub { $_[0]->end },
);
has end => (
isa => 'Int',
is => 'ro',
lazy => 1,
default => sub { $_[0]->start },
);
...
换句话说,我想要两个名为“start”和“end”的属性,如果只指定了其中一个属性,我希望将另一个属性设置为相同的东西。没有指定任何一个是错误。
这种相互依赖的设置是否有效?
答案 0 :(得分:16)
是的, if 通过验证至少指定了其中一个值来消除无限递归的可能性:
has start => (
...
predicate => 'has_start',
);
has end => (
...
predicate => 'has_end',
);
sub BUILD
{
my $self = shift;
die "Need to specify at least one of 'start', 'end'!" if not $self->has_start and not $self->has_end;
}
或者,您可以将检查延迟到默认的潜艇:
has start => (
...
predicate => 'has_start',
default => sub {
my $self = shift;
die "Need to specify at least one of 'start', 'end'!" if not $self->has_end;
$self->end;
},
);
has end => (
...
predicate => 'has_end',
default => sub {
my $self = shift;
die "Need to specify at least one of 'start', 'end'!" if not $self->has_start;
$self->start;
},
);
答案 1 :(得分:2)
就个人而言,我会利用懒惰来确保我没有陷入无限递归:
has start => (
is => 'ro',
isa => 'Int',
lazy => 1,
default => sub { shift->end },
predicate => 'has_start',
);
has end => (
is => 'ro',
isa => 'Int',
lazy => 1,
default => sub { shift->start },
predicate => 'has_end',
);
sub BUILD {
my $self = shift;
die "Need to specify at least one of 'start', 'end'!"
unless $self->has_start || $self->has_end;
}