我有以下用C ++ / CX编写的代码:
TaskPool^ TaskPool::Instance::get()
{
// Prevent acquiring the critical section for a static initialization
// after it's been properly initialized.
if (TaskPool::_instance == nullptr) {
static CRITICAL_SECTION section;
CriticalSection lock(§ion);
if (TaskPool::_instance == nullptr) {
_instance = ref new TaskPool();
InitializeCriticalSection(GetCriticalSection());
}
}
return _instance;
}
TaskPool^ TaskPool::_instance;
CRITICAL_SECTION TaskPool::_criticalSection;
void Threading::TaskPool::TaskRun(Concurrency::task<void> & task)
{
Log::LogMessage(this->GetType()->FullName, Level::Debug, "TaskRun [entering]");
EnterCriticalSection(GetCriticalSection());
Log::LogMessage(this->GetType()->FullName, Level::Debug, "TaskRun [entered]");
create_task(task).then([this]() {
Log::LogMessage(this->GetType()->FullName, Level::Debug, "TaskRun [leaving]");
LeaveCriticalSection(GetCriticalSection());
Log::LogMessage(this->GetType()->FullName, Level::Debug, "TaskRun [left]");
});
}
TaskPool
是一个任务调度程序,它使用CRITICAL_SECTION
同步分派同步任务。我已阅读here并在其他几个地方确认关键部分是可重入的。但是,我没有复制这种行为。
Threading.TaskPool <Debug> TaskRun [entering]
Threading.TaskPool <Debug> TaskRun [entered]
Threading.TaskPool <Debug> TaskRun [leaving]
Threading.TaskPool <Debug> TaskRun [left]
Threading.TaskPool <Debug> TaskRun [entering]
Threading.TaskPool <Debug> TaskRun [entering]
正如您所看到的,正在调度几个任务。但是,即使第一个任务似乎运行良好,添加到池中的其他任务也不会被分派。由于某种原因,没有输入临界区,线程似乎挂起。如果关键部分是递归的,还有什么可以解释这种行为?