haskell书要我实现
的可遍历实例newtype Constant a b = Constant { getConstant :: a }
包括所有必要的超类。下面的代码通过Quickcheck/Checkers
,但行为有趣
import Test.QuickCheck
import Test.QuickCheck.Checkers
import Test.QuickCheck.Classes
newtype Constant a b = Constant { getConstant :: a }
instance Functor (Constant a) where
fmap f (Constant a) = Constant a
instance Foldable (Constant a) where
foldr f z (Constant x) = z
instance Traversable (Constant a) where
traverse f (Constant a) = pure $ Constant a
type TI = []
main = do
let trigger = undefined :: TI (Int, Int, [Int])
quickBatch (traversable trigger)
当我尝试使用这样的可遍历实例时:
traverse (\x -> [x + 1]) $ Constant 5
我没有得到我希望的Constant [5]
,而是
traverse (\x -> [x + 1]) $ Constant 5
:: (Num b, Num a) => [Constant a b]
这是什么意思?我做错了什么?
答案 0 :(得分:5)
当我尝试使用这样的可遍历实例时:
traverse (\x -> [x + 1]) $ Constant 5
我没有得到
Constant [5]
我希望[...]
你不会得到Constant [5]
。让我们写一下traverse
的类型:
traverse :: (Traversable t, Applicative f) => (a -> f b) -> t a -> f (t b)
...并将其与您的实例化对齐:
-- I've substituted `x` for `a` and `y` for `b` in the
-- first type, because otherwise my head hurts.
(x -> f y) -> t x -> f (t y)
(Num a, Num b) => (a -> [] a) -> (Constant b) a -> [] ((Constant b) a)
所以我们有:
t = Constant b
f = []
x = Num a => a
y = NUm b => b
请注意traverse
的类型意味着t
在参数和结果中是相同的。由于您使用Constant 5 :: Num a => Constant a b
作为参数,这意味着您在结果中永远不会有Constant [5] :: Num a => Constant [a] b
,因为Constant a /= Constant [a]
。