如何让genOut / String消防?
module IOStream where
import System.IO
import System.IO.Unsafe
class Out a where
out :: a → String
instance Show a ⇒ Out a where
out = show
outString :: String → String
outString = id
{-# RULES "genOut/String" out = outString #-}
infixl 9 <<, ≪
(≪), (<<) :: Out a ⇒ IO Handle → a → IO Handle
(<<)= (≪)
h ≪ a = do
s ← h
hPutStr s $ out a
return s
cout, cin, cerr :: IO Handle
cout = return stdout
cin = return stdin
cerr = return stderr
endl :: String
endl = "\n"
--infixr 9 ∘ °
(∘) = (.)
(°) = flip (∘)
module Main where
import System.IO
import IOStream
foreign import ccall "pi.h f_" f_ :: IO Double
main :: IO Int
main = do
--putStrLn . show =<< f_
-- ((≪ endl) . (cout ≪)) =<< f_
(cout ≪) ° (≪ endl) =<< f_
return 0
编译和链接:
cetin@unique:~/lab/c/linking/demo$ ghc --version
The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 6.10.2
cetin@unique:~/lab/c/linking/demo$ ghc -fglasgow-exts -O2 -ddump-simpl-stats -XUndecidableInstances -O2 iostream.hs main.hs pi_v2.o -o hsex2
==================== FloatOut stats: ====================
0 Lets floated to top level; 1 Lets floated elsewhere; from 3 Lambda groups
==================== FloatOut stats: ====================
0 Lets floated to top level; 0 Lets floated elsewhere; from 5 Lambda groups
==================== Grand total simplifier statistics ====================
Total ticks: 184
40 PreInlineUnconditionally
45 PostInlineUnconditionally
24 UnfoldingDone
8 LetFloatFromLet
4 EtaReduction
57 BetaReduction
6 KnownBranch
11 SimplifierDone
==================== FloatOut stats: ====================
0 Lets floated to top level; 0 Lets floated elsewhere; from 1 Lambda groups
==================== FloatOut stats: ====================
3 Lets floated to top level; 0 Lets floated elsewhere; from 1 Lambda groups
==================== Grand total simplifier statistics ====================
Total ticks: 218
42 PreInlineUnconditionally
57 PostInlineUnconditionally
33 UnfoldingDone
9 LetFloatFromLet
1 EtaReduction
66 BetaReduction
10 KnownBranch
12 SimplifierDone
结果:
cetin@unique:~/lab/c/linking/demo$ ./hsex2
3.141592653589793"\n"cetin@unique:~/lab/c/linking/demo$
预期:
cetin@unique:~/lab/c/linking/demo$ ./hsex2
3.141592653589793
cetin@unique:~/lab/c/linking/demo$
如何解决这条规则?
答案 0 :(得分:4)
您似乎想要overlapping instances,因为您希望instance Out String
与instance Show a => Out a
不同,而{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances, TypeSynonymInstances #-}
{-# LANGUAGE OverlappingInstances, UndecidableInstances #-}
class Out a where out :: a -> String
instance Out String where out = id
instance (Show a) => Out a where out = show
与其重叠。
<<
一般建议是避免使用重叠实例和不可判断的实例,除非真正必要,因为他们所做的类型检查的更改不可移植并且可能导致其他问题。
实现方面,考虑每个类实例的字典。 Out
将为out
的实例提供字典,预期它将用作隐藏参数。由于RULE
正在从那里查找,因此out
无法解雇。{1}}如果RULE
不在类型类中,并且是从非多态函数调用的,那么我希望RULE
匹配,但是它不会令人惊讶它不起作用
SPECIALIZE
/ {{1}}仅用于优化,如果代码执行或不执行,则代码不应更改行为。
我花了一段时间才意识到你在做什么......你确实意识到Haskell不是C ++,对吧?利用多态的方式是完全不同的。