目前我的代码看起来像那样。
$stmt = $this->db->prepare("SELECT m.id, m.from_id, m.to_id, m.subject, m.date, m.deleted, m.read, u.fname, u.mname, u.lname FROM msghistory AS m,users AS u WHERE m.from_id=u.id AND m.to_id=u.id AND GROUP BY m.id DESC");
$stmt->execute();
$stmt->store_result();
if ($stmt->affected_rows > 0) {
$msg = array();
$stmt->bind_result($msg['id'], $msg['from_name'], $msg['to_name'], $msg['subject'], $msg['message'], $msg['date'], $msg['deleted'], $msg['read']);
while ($stmt->fetch()) {
<echoing results one by one> }
}
我希望将u.fname+u.mname+u.lname
(msghistory.from_id=users.id
)改为$msg['from_name']
,再次u.fname+u.mname+u.lname
(但这次msghistory.to_id=users.id
)作为$ msg ['to_name']。
message | from_id | to-id
hi | 1 | 5
如您所见,这意味着,用户1向用户5发送消息hi。
让我们在用户表fname中说,lname为用户id = 1 - John Doe和5 - George Smith 我想将此显示为输出结果
message | from_id | to-id
hi | John Doe| George Smith
我知道至少有3个查询是可能的。但试图找到最佳方式。那么,这可能只有一个查询吗?
基于用户的2个有用答案,我将查询修改为此
$stmt = $this->db->prepare("SELECT
message.id, message.from_id, message.to_id, message.subject,
message.date, message.deleted, message.read,
CONCAT_WS(' ',sender.fname, sender.mname, sender.lname) AS sender_name,
CONCAT_WS(' ',recipient.fname, recipient.mname, recipient.lname) AS recipient_name,
FROM msghistory AS message
LEFT JOIN users AS sender ON sender.id=message.from_id,
LEFT JOIN users AS recipient ON recipient.id=message.to_id
GROUP BY message.id DESC");
答案 0 :(得分:1)
SELECT m.id, m.from_id, m.to_id, m.subject, m.date,
m.deleted, m.read, u1.fname, u1.mname, u1.lname,
u2.fname, u2.mname, u2.lname,
FROM msghistory AS m,users AS u1, users As u2
WHERE m.from_id=u1.id AND m.to_id=u2.id
GROUP BY m.id DESC
我不确定你是否需要“分组”
答案 1 :(得分:1)
使用显式连接和清晰可读的别名使其既更强大,又更易于阅读。请尝试以下方法:
SELECT message.*, recipient.*, sender.*
FROM msghistory AS message
INNER JOIN users AS recipient ON recipient.id=m.to_id
INNER JOIN users AS sender ON sender.id=m.from_id
您可以将select * s替换为您想要提高效率的字段