更新:根据建议更新src。 strcat a \ n \ 0到命令并改变sizeof。客户端在发送时有一个“成功”,但服务器在接收时永远不会“成功”。
我已经付出了很多努力来尝试让常规的旧TCP套接字工作。我基本上有一个简单的客户端和服务器设置。目前我的服务器上根本没有收到任何东西,我的客户端只有4个字节(本例中为“GOTY”)。
服务器输出输出并继续:
RECEIVED (null)
客户端输出只是阻止而且永不停止。如果我杀了服务器,我得到这个输出
Connect success
Received Response:
SERVER
int Server::update(char *getbuf)
{
int ready = poll(pollfds, 1, 100);
if (ready == -1)
{
logger.info("Poll failed");
return FALSE;
}
if (pollfds[0].revents & POLLIN)
{
ssize_t z;
logger.info("Connection available");
struct sockaddr_in client_address;
memset(&client_address, 0, sizeof client_address);
socklen_t alen = sizeof(client_address);
// ACCEPT
clientsocket = accept(serversocket, (struct sockaddr *)&client_address, &alen);
if(!clientsocket)
logger.fail("Accept Fail");
// READ
z = recv(clientsocket, getbuf, 512, MSG_WAITALL);
if (z < 0)
fprintf(stderr,"receive failure\n");
else
fprintf(stderr,"receive succeed\n");
getbuf[z] = 0;
respond(getbuf);
//closeConnection();
logger.data("RECEIVED %s", getbuf);
getbuf[z] = 0;
return TRUE;
}
return FALSE;
}
void Server::respond(char *response)
{
// SEND
ssize_t z;
z = send(clientsocket, response, strlen(response), 0);
if (z < 0)
fprintf(stderr,"send failure\n");
else
fprintf(stderr,"send succeed\n");
}
客户
我添加了客户端代码。我现在使用strlen但它似乎没有帮助。
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int abort = 0;
int port;
in_addr_t address;
char *command;
ssize_t z;
int com_socket;
struct sockaddr_in server_address;
struct timeval timeout;
int opt;
int val = 0;
char getbuf[512];
//Defaults
address = inet_addr("127.0.0.1");
port = 4949;
//INCLUDED ARGUMENTS FROM CLI
while((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "a:p:c:")) > 0)
{
switch(opt)
{
case 'a':
address = inet_addr(optarg);
break;
case 'p':
port = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'c':
abort = 1;
command = (char *)optarg;
break;
default:
fprintf(stderr, "-a IPADDRESS -p PORT -c COMMAND\n",argv[0]);
}
}
// Server
memset(&server_address, 0, sizeof(server_address));
server_address.sin_family = AF_INET;
server_address.sin_port = htons(port);
server_address.sin_addr.s_addr = address;
if (server_address.sin_addr.s_addr == INADDR_NONE)
fprintf(stderr, "Server address failed\n");
if(!abort)
{
fprintf(stderr, "No Command given\n");
fprintf(stderr, "-a IPADDRESS -p PORT -C COMMAND\n");
exit(0);
}
else
{
fprintf(stderr, "Address %s Port %d Command %s\n", inet_ntoa(server_address.sin_addr), port, command);
}
// Create com_socket
com_socket = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
if (com_socket == -1)
fprintf(stderr, "Socket failed\n");
/*
// Client
struct sockaddr_in client_address;
memset(&client_address,0,sizeof client_address);
client_address.sin_family = AF_INET;
client_address.sin_port = 0;
client_address.sin_addr.s_addr = ntohl(INADDR_ANY);
if (client_address.sin_addr.s_addr == INADDR_NONE)
fprintf(stderr, "Client address failed\n");
// Bind
z= bind(com_socket, (struct sockaddr *)&client_address, sizeof (client_address));
if ( z == -1 )
fprintf(stderr,"Binding port\n");
*/
timeout.tv_sec = 2; /* 2 seconds */
timeout.tv_usec = 0; /* + 0 usec */
socklen_t addrlen = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in);
// Connect
//z = connectWithTimeout(com_socket, (struct sockaddr *) &server_address, len_inet, &timeout);
z = connect(com_socket, (struct sockaddr *) &server_address, sizeof(server_address));
if(z == -1)
{
if(errno == EINPROGRESS)
{
fprintf(stderr, "EINPROGRESS non block start\n");
}
if(errno == EALREADY)
{
fprintf(stderr, "EALREADY non block subsequent request\n");
}
fprintf(stderr, "Connect failed\n");
}
else
fprintf(stderr, "Connect success\n");
strcat(command, "\n\0");
// SEND
z = send(com_socket, command, strlen(command)+2, 0);
if (z < 0)
fprintf(stderr,"send failure\n");
else
fprintf(stderr,"send succeed\n");
// READ
z = recv(com_socket, getbuf, 512, MSG_WAITALL);
if (z < 0)
fprintf(stderr,"receive failure\n");
else
fprintf(stderr,"receive succeed\n");
// Output
fprintf(stderr, "Received Response: %s\n", getbuf);
close(com_socket);
exit(1);
}
我只是不知道为什么这不起作用。我一次又一次地过去了。
这是一个嵌入式Linux系统。
答案 0 :(得分:4)
在服务器中:这是完全错误的。 strlen()返回 read()/ recv()之前缓冲区中字符串的长度。
// READ
z = recv(clientsocket, getbuf, strlen(getbuf), MSG_WAITALL);
if (z < 0)
fprintf(stderr,"receive failure\n");
另外:在respond()中,strlen()假定响应“string”为空终止。事实并非如此。
z = send(clientsocket, response, strlen(response), 0);
客户端代码中似乎存在相同类型的错误。
更新:由于OP不知道如何在没有字符串函数的情况下生存,我将说明如何做到这一点。
... snipped ...
// READ
z = recv(clientsocket, getbuf, 512, MSG_WAITALL);
if (z < 0) {
// .... if (errno == EAGAIN) continue;
fprintf(stderr,"receive failure %d(%s) \n"
, errno, strerror(errno) );
break; }
fprintf(stderr,"receive succeed\n");
respond(getbuf, z);
return TRUE;
}
return FALSE;
}
void respond(char *response, size_t siz)
{
// SEND
size_t done;
ssize_t z;
for (done = 0; done < siz; done += z) {
z = send(clientsocket, response+done, siz-done, 0);
if (z < 0) {
if (errno == EAGAIN) continue;
fprintf(stderr,"send failure %d(%s)\n"
, errno, strerror(errno) );
break; }
fprintf(stderr,"send succeed\n");
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:2)
由于你还没有真正分享你的“回应”功能的来源,我的心灵力量告诉我它看起来像这样:
void Server::respond(char* str)
{
send(clientsock, str, sizeof(str), 0);
}
因此,“sizeof(str)”正在评估为4,因为这是您机器上指针的大小。这与客户端收到“GOTY”(您要发送的邮件的前4个字节)一致。
将其更改为以下内容:
void Server::respond(char* str)
{
send(clientsock, str, strlen(str), 0);
}
此外,您永远不应该假设send和recv将返回一个等于您希望发送或接收的数据量的值。因此,您应该将非阻塞调用循环到send / recv,直到整个消息被发送或消费为止。
答案 2 :(得分:-2)
套接字上的发送操作通常是缓冲的,因此您的响应功能可能不会刷新所有数据。在respond()
结束时尝试刷新操作以获取额外数据。
我觉得你看到阻塞行为,你可能想看看阻塞/非阻塞如何影响套接字。