当我将代码(粘贴在下面)提交给在线gcc编译器时,我收到以下错误消息。
* glibc检测到 / run-1326102706-2046832693 /解决方案:双重免费或损坏(!prev):0x091901a8 * * == =====
代码如下:
# include <iostream>
# include <string>
# include <list>
# include <cstring>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int test_cases, i, score, str_len;
string str;
char first_char, current_char;
list <int> strlist;
list <int> :: iterator it;
cin>>test_cases;
char *cstr[test_cases]; //Creating an array of cstr pointers (test_cases number of pointers)
while(test_cases > 0)
{
cin>>str;
first_char = str.at(0);
str_len = str.length();
score = str_len;
strlist.clear();
cstr[test_cases-1] = new char[str_len];
strcpy(cstr[test_cases-1],str.c_str()); //copying the input str into cstr. This is done to minimize the complexity of std::string's at function.
for(i=1;i<str_len; i++)
{
current_char = *(cstr[test_cases-1]+i);
if (current_char == first_char)
{
score++; strlist.push_front(1);
it = strlist.begin();
if (it != strlist.end())
it++;
}
while (!strlist.empty() && it != strlist.end())
{
if (current_char == *(cstr[test_cases-1] + *(it)))
{
(*it)++;it++;score++;
}
else
it = strlist.erase(it);
}
if (!strlist.empty())
it = strlist.begin();
}
cout<<score<<endl;
delete(cstr[test_cases-1]);
test_cases--;
}
return 0;
}
正如代码本身所提到的,我最初使用std :: string,但发现std :: string.at函数非常慢(特别是因为这个问题确实有很大的输入字符串)。所以我决定将字符串输入存储在字符数组中,以便可以直接索引到特定位置。
感谢任何帮助。
答案 0 :(得分:3)
我可以看到两个问题:
cstr[test_cases-1] = new char[str_len]; // Not allocating space for terminating NULL.
delete(cstr[test_cases-1]); // Incorrect delete, should be delete[]
// As already pointed out by mooware
将这两行更改为:
cstr[test_cases-1] = new char[str_len + 1];
delete[] cstr[test_cases-1];
答案 1 :(得分:2)
您正在使用array-new(&#34; new char [str_len]&#34;)来分配字符串,但是标量删除(&#34;删除(cstr [test_cases-1])&#34 ;)删除它们。你应该总是匹配new-和delete-operator,所以当你使用array-new时,也要使用array-delete(&#34; delete [] cstr [test_cases-1]&#34;)。
答案 2 :(得分:1)
你有两个错误。一个在这里:
cstr[test_cases-1] = new char[str_len];
strcpy(cstr[test_cases-1],str.c_str());
您分配的字节太少。这应该是new char[str_len+1]
,因为strcpy
复制终结符。
另一个在这里:
delete(cstr[test_cases-1]);
您无法使用new[]
进行分配,也无法使用delete
取消分配。如果您使用new[]
进行分配,则必须使用delete[]
解除分配。