Question

我正在尝试使用C ++ 11的std :: tr1 :: shared_ptr来管理SDL_Surface指针。注意，我没有使用Boost。我已经为shared_ptr定义了一个删除器来使用SDL_FreeSurface。

声明如下：

class Engine {
private:
  std::tr1::shared_ptr<SDL_Surface> _scr;
  std::tr1::shared_ptr<SDL_Surface> _bg;

定义（在引擎的ctor中），如：

_scr = std::tr1::shared_ptr<SDL_Surface>( SDL_SetVideoMode(Data::SCR_WIDTH,
                                                          Data::SCR_HEIGHT,
                                                        32, SDL_SWSURFACE),
                                            SurfaceDeleter<SDL_Surface>());

  _bg = std::tr1::shared_ptr<SDL_Surface>(IMG_Load(Data::IM_BACKGROUND),
                                         SurfaceDeleter<SDL_Surface>());

自定义删除器：

template<typename T>
class SurfaceDeleter{ 
public:
  void operator() (T*& d) const {
    if(d){
      SDL_FreeSurface(d);
    }
  }
};

持有shared_ptr的唯一对象是Engine。 shared_ptr的用法如下：

  SDL_BlitSurface(_bg.get(), nullptr, _scr.get(), nullptr);
  SDL_Flip(_scr.get());

Valgrind结果：

==3648== 8 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 16 of 292
==3648==    at 0x402A018: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==3648==    by 0x431FBE0: strdup (in /lib/libc-2.14.1.so)

==3648== 1 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 292
==3648==    at 0x402A018: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==3648==    by 0x494A590: _XlcDefaultMapModifiers (in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0)
==3648==    by 0x494A99A: XSetLocaleModifiers (in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0)
==3648==    by 0x4097CDB: ??? (in /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3)
==3648==    by 0x4083868: SDL_VideoInit (in /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3)
==3648==    by 0x40594D9: SDL_InitSubSystem (in /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3)
==3648==    by 0x42C3212: (below main) (in /lib/libc-2.14.1.so)

==3648== 980 (68 direct, 912 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 258 of 292
==3648==    at 0x402A102: realloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==3648==    by 0x49402A6: ??? (in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0)
==3648==    by 0x49407A2: ??? (in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0)
==3648==    by 0x494212F: ??? (in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0)
==3648==    by 0x49429BA: _XlcCreateLC (in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0)
==3648==    by 0x4965957: _XlcUtf8Loader (in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0)
==3648==    by 0x494A793: _XOpenLC (in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0)
==3648==    by 0x494A8F1: _XlcCurrentLC (in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6.3.0)
==3648==    by 0x4097CDB: ??? (in /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3)
==3648==    by 0x4083868: SDL_VideoInit (in /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3)
==3648==    by 0x40594D9: SDL_InitSubSystem (in /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0.11.3)
==3648==    by 0x42C3212: (below main) (in /lib/libc-2.14.1.so)

Answer 1

使用--track-origins=yes运行valgrind，以便显示已分配泄漏内存的位置。

您可能还想使用--leak-check=full和--leak-resolution=high（虽然后者应该是默认值）

为什么我的shared_ptr泄漏内存？

1 个答案: