之间的一个简单问题:我有一个简单的WeakRunnableList。 是这样可以清理它(删除死引用),还是有更优雅,更快的解决方案。我的WeakRunnableList的完整源代码:
public class WeakRunnableList
{
private ArrayList<WeakReference<Runnable>> _items = new ArrayList<WeakReference<Runnable>>();
public void Add(Runnable r)
{
_items.add(new WeakReference<Runnable>(r));
}
public void Execute()
{
ArrayList<WeakReference<Runnable>> remove = new ArrayList<WeakReference<Runnable>>();
for (WeakReference<Runnable> item : _items)
{
Runnable tempCheck = item.get();
if (tempCheck == null)
{
remove.add(item);
}
else
{
tempCheck.run();
}
}
_items.removeAll(remove);
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:7)
这是我的看法。 WeakHashMap自动删除,所以这应该足够了。请注意Runnable的hashCode / equals语义。
另见 Are keySet entries of a WeakHashMap never null? WeakHashMap iteration and garbage collection
import java.util.WeakHashMap;
public class WeakRunnableList
{
private WeakHashMap<Runnable, Void> _items = new WeakHashMap<Runnable, Void>();
public void Add(Runnable r)
{
_items.put(r, null);
}
public void Execute()
{
Iterator<Runnable> iterator = _items.keySet().iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
Runnable runnable = iterator.next();
if (runnable != null) {
runnable.run();
iterator.remove();
}
}
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:1)
您对item.get()的调用之间存在竞争条件。我会将item.get()放入一个局部变量并使用它。