我有一个ruby超时,它调用这样的系统(bash)命令..
Timeout::timeout(10) {
`my_bash_command -c12 -o text.txt`
}
但我认为即使ruby线程被中断,实际命令仍然在后台运行..这是正常的吗?我怎么能杀了它?
答案 0 :(得分:32)
我认为你必须手动kill
:
require 'timeout'
puts 'starting process'
pid = Process.spawn('sleep 20')
begin
Timeout.timeout(5) do
puts 'waiting for the process to end'
Process.wait(pid)
puts 'process finished in time'
end
rescue Timeout::Error
puts 'process not finished in time, killing it'
Process.kill('TERM', pid)
end
答案 1 :(得分:11)
为了正确停止衍生的进程树(不仅仅是父进程),你应该考虑这样的事情:
def exec_with_timeout(cmd, timeout)
pid = Process.spawn(cmd, {[:err,:out] => :close, :pgroup => true})
begin
Timeout.timeout(timeout) do
Process.waitpid(pid, 0)
$?.exitstatus == 0
end
rescue Timeout::Error
Process.kill(15, -Process.getpgid(pid))
false
end
end
这也允许您跟踪进程状态
答案 2 :(得分:6)
也许这会帮助其他人寻求实现类似的超时功能,但需要从shell命令中收集输出。
我已经使用@ shurikk的方法来处理Ruby 2.0和来自Fork child process with timeout and capture output的一些代码来收集输出。
def exec_with_timeout(cmd, timeout)
begin
# stdout, stderr pipes
rout, wout = IO.pipe
rerr, werr = IO.pipe
stdout, stderr = nil
pid = Process.spawn(cmd, pgroup: true, :out => wout, :err => werr)
Timeout.timeout(timeout) do
Process.waitpid(pid)
# close write ends so we can read from them
wout.close
werr.close
stdout = rout.readlines.join
stderr = rerr.readlines.join
end
rescue Timeout::Error
Process.kill(-9, pid)
Process.detach(pid)
ensure
wout.close unless wout.closed?
werr.close unless werr.closed?
# dispose the read ends of the pipes
rout.close
rerr.close
end
stdout
end
答案 3 :(得分:1)
处理流程,信号和计时器并不是一件容易的事。这就是您可以考虑委派此任务的原因:在新版本的Linux上使用命令timeout
:
timeout --kill-after 5s 10s my_bash_command -c12 -o text.txt