让我们在应用程序中有一个经典的Executor
。应用程序的许多部分使用此执行程序进行某些计算,每个计算都可以取消,为此我可以在Executor上调用shutdown()
或shutdownNow()
。
但我想只关闭Executor中的部分任务。遗憾的是,我无法访问Future
个对象,它们是计算实现的私有部分(实际上计算由actor框架jetlang支持)
我想要像Executor包装器这样的东西,我可以传递给计算,并且应该由真正的Executor支持。像这样:
// main application executor
Executor applicationExecutor = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
// starting computation
Executor computationExecutor = new ExecutorWrapper(applicationExecutor);
Computation computation = new Computation(computationExecutor);
computation.start();
// cancelling computation
computation.cancel();
// shutting down only computation tasks
computationExecutor.shutdown();
// applicationExecutor remains running and happy
还是其他任何想法?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
对于那些希望获得好结果的人:有最终解决方案,部分基于Ivan Sopov的回答。幸运的是,jetlang只用Executor
接口(而不是ExecutorService
)来运行它的任务,所以我创建了一个包装类,它支持只停止由这个包装器创建的任务。
static class StoppableExecutor implements Executor {
final ExecutorService executor;
final List<Future<?>> futures = Lists.newArrayList();
boolean stopped;
public StoppableExecutor(ExecutorService executor) {
this.executor = executor;
}
void stop() {
this.stopped = true;
synchronized (futures) {
for (Iterator<Future<?>> iterator = futures.iterator(); iterator.hasNext();) {
Future<?> future = iterator.next();
if (!future.isDone() && !future.isCancelled()) {
System.out.println(future.cancel(true));
}
}
futures.clear();
}
}
@Override
public void execute(Runnable command) {
if (!stopped) {
synchronized (futures) {
Future<?> newFuture = executor.submit(command);
for (Iterator<Future<?>> iterator = futures.iterator(); iterator.hasNext();) {
Future<?> future = iterator.next();
if (future.isDone() || future.isCancelled())
iterator.remove();
}
futures.add(newFuture);
}
}
}
}
使用它非常简单:
ExecutorService service = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5);
StoppableExecutor executor = new StoppableExecutor(service);
// doing some actor stuff with executor instance
PoolFiberFactory factory = new PoolFiberFactory(executor);
// stopping tasks only created on executor instance
// executor service is happily running other tasks
executor.stop();
这就是全部。效果很好。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
在设置布尔标志之前,如何让Computation
成为Runnable
(并使用提供的Executor
运行)?有点像:
public class Computation
{
boolean volatile stopped;
public void run(){
while(!stopped){
//do magic
}
public void cancel)(){stopped=true;}
}
你正在做的事实上是停止线程。但是,它不会被垃圾收集,而是重新使用,因为它由Executor管理。查看“停止线程的正确方法是什么?”。
编辑:请注意上面的代码是非常原始的,因为它假设while循环的主体需要很短的时间。如果没有,检查将很少执行,您会发现取消任务与实际停止之间有延迟。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
这样的东西? 您可以部分关闭:
for (Future<?> future : %ExecutorServiceWrapperInstance%.getFutures()) {
if (%CONDITION%) {
future.cancel(true);
}
}
以下是代码:
package com.sopovs.moradanen;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
public class ExecutorServiceWrapper implements ExecutorService {
private final ExecutorService realService;
private List<Future<?>> futures = new ArrayList<Future<?>>();
public ExecutorServiceWrapper(ExecutorService realService) {
this.realService = realService;
}
@Override
public void execute(Runnable command) {
realService.execute(command);
}
@Override
public void shutdown() {
realService.shutdown();
}
@Override
public List<Runnable> shutdownNow() {
return realService.shutdownNow();
}
@Override
public boolean isShutdown() {
return realService.isShutdown();
}
@Override
public boolean isTerminated() {
return realService.isTerminated();
}
@Override
public boolean awaitTermination(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException {
return realService.awaitTermination(timeout, unit);
}
@Override
public <T> Future<T> submit(Callable<T> task) {
Future<T> future = realService.submit(task);
synchronized (this) {
futures.add(future);
}
return future;
}
public synchronized List<Future<?>> getFutures() {
return Collections.unmodifiableList(futures);
}
@Override
public <T> Future<T> submit(Runnable task, T result) {
Future<T> future = realService.submit(task, result);
synchronized (this) {
futures.add(future);
}
return future;
}
@Override
public Future<?> submit(Runnable task) {
Future<?> future = realService.submit(task);
synchronized (this) {
futures.add(future);
}
return future;
}
@Override
public <T> List<Future<T>> invokeAll(Collection<? extends Callable<T>> tasks) throws InterruptedException {
List<Future<T>> future = realService.invokeAll(tasks);
synchronized (this) {
futures.addAll(future);
}
return future;
}
@Override
public <T> List<Future<T>> invokeAll(Collection<? extends Callable<T>> tasks, long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
throws InterruptedException {
List<Future<T>> future = realService.invokeAll(tasks, timeout, unit);
synchronized (this) {
futures.addAll(future);
}
return future;
}
@Override
public <T> T invokeAny(Collection<? extends Callable<T>> tasks) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
//don't know what to do here. Maybe this method is not needed by the framework
//than just throw new NotImplementedException();
return realService.invokeAny(tasks);
}
@Override
public <T> T invokeAny(Collection<? extends Callable<T>> tasks, long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException {
//don't know what to do here. Maybe this method is not needed by the framework
//than just throw new NotImplementedException();
return realService.invokeAny(tasks, timeout, unit);
}
}