我对这个很困惑。根据{{1}}它看起来没问题,但是MYSQL慢速日志报告的结果却截然不同:
EXPLAIN
现在,如果我对此查询执行了Count : 21 (8.50%)
Time : 174 s total, 8.285714 s avg, 6 s to 16 s max (7.87%)
95% of Time : 142 s total, 7.473684 s avg, 6 s to 10 s max
Lock Time (s) : 0 total, 0 avg, 0 to 0 max (0.00%)
95% of Lock : 0 total, 0 avg, 0 to 0 max
Rows sent : 34 avg, 1 to 42 max (0.05%)
Rows examined : 2.63G avg, 8.13M to 4.22G max (99.97%)
Database :
Users :
hub@localhost 127.0.0.1 : 100.00% (21) of query, 98.38% (243) of all users
:
EXPLAIN
就我所见,我看起来没问题,但是我错过了一些东西而我却看不到它。有什么想法吗?
更新 好的,这是使用g.d.d.c sql的EXPLAIN(看起来好多了):
mysql> explain SELECT t.* FROM teamproject t WHERE t.company_id= 3494 AND t.template=0 AND t.id IN (SELECT DISTINCT a.targetId FROM acl a WHERE a.targetId=t.id and a.targetType='hub.app.model.TeamProject' AND a.company_id = 3494 AND a.role_id=4 AND a.permission_id=4 UNION SELECT DISTINCT a.targetId FROM acl a WHERE a.targetId=t.id AND a.targetType='hub.app.model.TeamProject' AND a.company_id = 3494 AND a.role_id=-1 and a.user_id= 20929 ) ORDER BY t.name ASC limit 500 \G;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: PRIMARY
table: t
type: ref
possible_keys: FK2EF9161C3D5FD8EF
key: FK2EF9161C3D5FD8EF
key_len: 8
ref: const
rows: 93
Extra: Using where; Using filesort
*************************** 2. row ***************************
id: 2
select_type: DEPENDENT SUBQUERY
table: a
type: ref
possible_keys: company_id,FK1788A3D5FD8EF,FK1788AA16C7AE5,IDX1788AA27C8AE1,IDX1788AA27C8AE2,IDX1788AA27C8AE4,IDX1788AA27C8AE5,IDX1788AA27C8999
key: company_id
key_len: 18
ref: const,const
rows: 1
Extra: Using where; Using index; Using temporary
*************************** 3. row ***************************
id: 3
select_type: DEPENDENT UNION
table: a
type: ref
possible_keys: company_id,FK1788A3D5FD8EF,IDX1788AA27C8AE1,IDX1788AA27C8AE2,IDX1788AA27C8AE4,IDX1788AA27C8AE5,IDX1788AA27C8AE6,IDX1788AA27C8999
key: IDX1788AA27C8AE1
key_len: 9
ref: func
rows: 5
Extra: Using where; Using temporary
*************************** 4. row ***************************
id: NULL
select_type: UNION RESULT
table: <union2,3>
type: ALL
possible_keys: NULL
key: NULL
key_len: NULL
ref: NULL
rows: NULL
Extra:
4 rows in set (0.01 sec)
acl上的索引是:
*************************** 1. row ***************************
id: 1
select_type: PRIMARY
table: t
type: ref
possible_keys: FK2EF9161C3D5FD8EF
key: FK2EF9161C3D5FD8EF
key_len: 8
ref: const
rows: 93
Extra: Using where; Using filesort
*************************** 2. row ***************************
id: 2
select_type: DEPENDENT SUBQUERY
table: a
type: index_subquery
possible_keys: company_id,FK1788A3D5FD8EF,FK1788AA16C7AE5,IDX1788AA27C8AE1,IDX1788AA27C8AE2,IDX1788AA27C8AE4,IDX1788AA27C8AE5,IDX1788AA27C8AE6,IDX1788AA27C8999
key: IDX1788AA27C8AE1
key_len: 9
ref: func
rows: 3
Extra: Using where
答案 0 :(得分:2)
我认为,首先,您可以重新格式化where子句以避免使用UNION。这可能会删除大量已检查的行。接下来,在acl
?/ / p>中索引哪些列
SELECT
t.*
FROM
teamproject t
WHERE
t.company_id= 3494
AND
t.template=0
AND
t.id IN (
SELECT DISTINCT
a.targetId
FROM
acl a
WHERE
a.targetId=t.id
and
a.targetType='hub.app.model.TeamProject'
AND
a.company_id = 3494
AND
((a.role_id=4
AND
a.permission_id=4)
OR
(a.role_id=-1
and
a.user_id= 20929))
)
ORDER BY
t.name ASC limit 500