如何让Url.Action使用正确的端口号?

时间:2011-10-17 15:23:01

标签: asp.net asp.net-mvc-3 azure

我正在使用MVC3创建一个网站,我使用剃刀语法创建视图,它们都在azure下运行。

目前我在本地的天蓝色模拟器下运行。

我在网址上有一个视图:'http://localhost:81/Blah/Foo'。

在该视图中,我想让Url接受其他操作。

要实现这一点,我使用:Url.Action(“SomeAction”,“SomeController”,null,this.Request.Url.Scheme)

然而,由于负载平衡,azure仿真器执行端口号,因此会对更改进行请求。

即。当它在81端口运行时,请求可能来自端口82。

这导致创建了一个不正确的网址“http://localhost:82/Blah/Bar”,我收到了一个400,错误的主机名错误。

根据这篇文章http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/windowsazure/thread/9142db8d-0f85-47a2-91f7-418bb5a0c675/中的信息,我发现我可以使用HttpContext.Request.Headers [“Host”]获得正确的主机和端口号。

但是我只能将主机名传递给Url.Action,如果我尝试传递主机名和端口,那么它仍会附加它认为正确的端口,所以我最终得到localhost:81:82。< / p> 编辑:我发现有人遇到同样的问题。他们似乎收集了我所拥有的相同信息(除了他们也包括了一个复制品),但他们没有一个有用的修复,因为我无法手动指定端口号。

http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/windowsazuredevelopment/thread/87c729e8-094c-4578-b9d1-9c8ff7311577/

我想一个修复就是让我自己的Url.Action重载让我指定端口。

3 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:23)

对于每个来到这里的人来说,他们实际上需要一条绝对的道路并且在负载平衡系统之后,这就是我想出的:

//http://stackoverflow.com/questions/126242/how-do-i-turn-a-relative-url-into-a-full-url
public static string AbsoluteAction(this UrlHelper url, string actionName, string controllerName, object routeValues = null)
{
  Uri publicFacingUrl = GetPublicFacingUrl(url.RequestContext.HttpContext.Request, url.RequestContext.HttpContext.Request.ServerVariables);
  string relAction = url.Action(actionName, controllerName, routeValues);
  //this will always have a / in front of it.
  var newPort = publicFacingUrl.Port == 80 || publicFacingUrl.Port == 443 ? "" : ":"+publicFacingUrl.Port.ToString();
  return publicFacingUrl.Scheme + Uri.SchemeDelimiter + publicFacingUrl.Host + newPort + relAction;
}

然后,从https://github.com/aarnott/dotnetopenid/blob/v3.4/src/DotNetOpenAuth/Messaging/HttpRequestInfo.cshttp://go4answers.webhost4life.com/Example/azure-messing-port-numbers-creates-28516.aspx

   /// <summary>
    /// Gets the public facing URL for the given incoming HTTP request.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="request">The request.</param>
    /// <param name="serverVariables">The server variables to consider part of the request.</param>
    /// <returns>
    /// The URI that the outside world used to create this request.
    /// </returns>
    /// <remarks>
    /// Although the <paramref name="serverVariables"/> value can be obtained from
    /// <see cref="HttpRequest.ServerVariables"/>, it's useful to be able to pass them
    /// in so we can simulate injected values from our unit tests since the actual property
    /// is a read-only kind of <see cref="NameValueCollection"/>.
    /// </remarks>
internal static Uri GetPublicFacingUrl(HttpRequestBase request, NameValueCollection serverVariables)
{
  //Contract.Requires<ArgumentNullException>(request != null);
  //Contract.Requires<ArgumentNullException>(serverVariables != null);

  // Due to URL rewriting, cloud computing (i.e. Azure)
  // and web farms, etc., we have to be VERY careful about what
  // we consider the incoming URL.  We want to see the URL as it would
  // appear on the public-facing side of the hosting web site.
  // HttpRequest.Url gives us the internal URL in a cloud environment,
  // So we use a variable that (at least from what I can tell) gives us
  // the public URL:
  if (serverVariables["HTTP_HOST"] != null)
  {
    //ErrorUtilities.VerifySupported(request.Url.Scheme == Uri.UriSchemeHttps || request.Url.Scheme == Uri.UriSchemeHttp, "Only HTTP and HTTPS are supported protocols.");
    string scheme = serverVariables["HTTP_X_FORWARDED_PROTO"] ?? request.Url.Scheme;
    Uri hostAndPort = new Uri(scheme + Uri.SchemeDelimiter + serverVariables["HTTP_HOST"]);
    UriBuilder publicRequestUri = new UriBuilder(request.Url);
    publicRequestUri.Scheme = scheme;
    publicRequestUri.Host = hostAndPort.Host;
    publicRequestUri.Port = hostAndPort.Port; // CC missing Uri.Port contract that's on UriBuilder.Port
    return publicRequestUri.Uri;
  }
  // Failover to the method that works for non-web farm enviroments.
  // We use Request.Url for the full path to the server, and modify it
  // with Request.RawUrl to capture both the cookieless session "directory" if it exists
  // and the original path in case URL rewriting is going on.  We don't want to be
  // fooled by URL rewriting because we're comparing the actual URL with what's in
  // the return_to parameter in some cases.
  // Response.ApplyAppPathModifier(builder.Path) would have worked for the cookieless
  // session, but not the URL rewriting problem.
  return new Uri(request.Url, request.RawUrl);
}

答案 1 :(得分:1)

如果您只使用Url.Action(“操作”,“控制器”)会发生什么?这应该只生成一个相对的URL,这应该有用。

(或许更好的问题是:你为什么不使用那种重载?)

答案 2 :(得分:0)

我发现这对我有用......

var request = HttpContext.Request;
string url = request.Url.Scheme + "://" +
             request.UserHostAddress +  ":" +
             request.Url.Port;