使用Moq模拟HttpApplicationState时似乎无法设置对象

时间:2011-08-29 15:28:03

标签: c# unit-testing mocking moq httpapplicationstate

我有一个动作过滤器,它在过滤器上下文的HttpContext的HttpApplicationState中设置一个对象。我想在单元测试中使用此功能,但由于某种原因,该对象未在HttpApplicationState派生的底层NameObjectCollectionBase中设置。

我知道功能有效,因为当我运行MVC应用程序时,它按预期工作。

如何设置测试以使其在应用程序状态下设置对象?我使用Moq,这是目前为止的一些代码。它失败了

Asset.IsNotNull(context.HttpContext.Application["config"]);

这是代码。

public override void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext filterContext)
{
    ControllerBase controller = filterContext.Controller;
    if (!(controller is ApplicationController))
        return;

    ApplicationController applicationController = (ApplicationController) controller;

    IDictionary<string, string> config;

    // Loads the view configuration values.
    if (filterContext.HttpContext.Application["config"] == null)
    {
        config = applicationController.ApplicationService.GetConfiguration();
        filterContext.HttpContext.Application["config"] = config;
    }
    else
    {
        config = (IDictionary<string, string>) filterContext.HttpContext.Application["config"];
    }

    applicationController.ViewBag.BlogTitle = AddConfigurationValueToViewBag("BlogTitle", config);

}

到目前为止,这是测试。

[TestMethod]
public void ApplicationAttribute_OnActionExecuted_SetsConfigurationDctionaryInAppicationCache()
{
    // Arrange
    Mock<HttpContextBase> httpContext = new Mock<HttpContextBase>();

    var mockApplicationState = new Mock<HttpApplicationStateBase>();
    httpContext.Setup(h => h.Application).Returns(mockApplicationState.Object);

    ApplicationController applicationController = new BlogController(null, null, MocksAndStubs.CreateMockApplicationService());

    Mock<ActionExecutedContext> actionExecutedContext = new Mock<ActionExecutedContext>();
    actionExecutedContext.SetupGet(c => c.HttpContext).Returns(httpContext.Object);
    actionExecutedContext.SetupGet(c => c.Controller).Returns(applicationController);

    // Act
    ApplicationAttribute applicationAttribute = new ApplicationAttribute();
    ActionExecutedContext context = actionExecutedContext.Object;
    applicationAttribute.OnActionExecuted(context);

    // Assert
    Assert.IsNotNull(context.HttpContext.Application["config"]);
}

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

看起来你期望你的模拟对象或多或少地像真实对象一样。它不起作用;模拟只会做你告诉它做的事情,仅此而已。如果你没有告诉模拟器在你打电话时返回特定的东西。 。

context.HttpContext.Application["config"]

。 。 。那根本就不会。如果您确实设置了模拟以返回特定的内容,则会破坏您的测试目的。

没有任何额外的理解或您的情况(测试状态的“什么”和“为什么”),看起来您正在尝试确保调用应用程序状态的集合。我建议使用mockApplicationState.Verify()作为断言来测试集合发生,而不是测试对象本身的结果状态。

修改 Verify()允许断言/确保调用方法(或属性方法),有或没有条件。这应该让你开始:

http://code.google.com/p/moq/wiki/QuickStart#Verification

所以你的验证看起来像(完全未经测试!):

mockApplicationState.Verify(x => x["config"] == [expected value], Times.Once());

如果mockApplicationState [“config”]设置为小于一次或多于一次的预期值,这基本上表示测试失败。

我假设HttpApplicationStateBase没有密封。如果是,则上述情况可能会引发异常。

答案 1 :(得分:0)

作为MOQ的替代方案,我经常在这种情况下生成一些从System.Web.Abstractions中的基类派生的存根。我经常将此技术用于MVC应用程序,因为MVC / WebApi控制器包含对HttpContext(HttpContextBase)的抽象

这样我可以在我的单元/集成测试中存根HttpContext要求,这是一个示例......

public class MockHttpApplicationState : HttpApplicationStateBase
{
    private IDictionary<string, object> _appState = new Dictionary<string, object>();

    public override void Add(string name, object value)
    {
        _appState.Add(name, value);
    }

    public override object Get(string name)
    {
        return _appState[name];
    }

    public override object this[string name]
    {
        get
        {
            return _appState[name];
        }

        set
        {
            _appState[name] = value;
        }
    }
}

public class MockHttpContext : HttpContextBase
{
    private IDictionary<string, object> _appKeys;

    public MockHttpContext()
    {

    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Accepts a dictionary of app keys to supply to the HttpApplicationState instance
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="applicationState"></param>
    public MockHttpContext(IDictionary<string,object> applicationState)
    {
        _appKeys = applicationState;
    }

    public override Cache Cache
    {
        get
        {                
            return HttpRuntime.Cache;
        }
    }

    public override HttpApplicationStateBase Application
    {
        get
        {
            var mockAppState = new MockHttpApplicationState();

            foreach (string key in _appKeys.Keys)
            {
                mockAppState.Add(key, _appKeys[key]);
            }

            return mockAppState;
        }
    }

    public override HttpRequestBase Request
    {
        get
        {
            return new HttpRequestWrapper(new HttpRequest(null,"http://localhost",null));
        }
    }
}

然后我的测试可以建立Controller和Http Context:

private readonly OnlineShop.MVC.Controllers.HomeController _controller = 
        new MVC.Controllers.HomeController(null,new UnitOfWork());

    [OneTimeSetUp]
    public void Init()
    {
        var appKeys = new Dictionary<string, object>();

        appKeys.Add("localhost", 1);

        var httpContext = new MockHttpContext(appKeys);

        _controller.ControllerContext = new ControllerContext()
        {
            Controller = _controller,
            RequestContext = new RequestContext(httpContext, new RouteData())    
        };                        
    }

    [Test]
    public void Index_Returns_HomeView()
    {            
        var view = _controller.Index() as ViewResult;
        var viewModel = view.Model as MVC.ViewModels.Home;

        Assert.IsInstanceOf<OnlineShop.MVC.ViewModels.Home>(viewModel);
        Assert.IsTrue(viewModel.FeaturedProducts.Count > 0);
    }

我的控制器知道它是提供缓存和应用程序状态的环境HttpContextBase实例:

  public ActionResult Index()
    {                        
        string cacheKey = string.Format("FeaturedProducts-{0}",WebsiteId);
        IList<Product> productList = this.HttpContext.Cache[cacheKey] as IList<Product>;


        //My app keeps a list of website contexts in the Application. This test returns 1 based on the unit / int tests or a real world db value when hosted on IIS etc..
        int websiteId = (int)HttpContext.Application[this.Request.Url.Host];