我创建了一个自定义ValidationAttribute,用于比较2个日期,并确保第二个日期大于第一个日期:
public sealed class IsDateAfter : ValidationAttribute, IClientValidatable
{
private readonly string testedPropertyName;
private readonly bool allowEqualDates;
public IsDateAfter(string testedPropertyName, bool allowEqualDates = false)
{
this.testedPropertyName = testedPropertyName;
this.allowEqualDates = allowEqualDates;
}
protected override ValidationResult IsValid(object value, ValidationContext validationContext)
{
var propertyTestedInfo = validationContext.ObjectType.GetProperty(this.testedPropertyName);
if (propertyTestedInfo == null)
{
return new ValidationResult(string.Format("unknown property {0}", this.testedPropertyName));
}
var propertyTestedValue = propertyTestedInfo.GetValue(validationContext.ObjectInstance, null);
if (value == null || !(value is DateTime))
{
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
if (propertyTestedValue == null || !(propertyTestedValue is DateTime))
{
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
// Compare values
if ((DateTime)value >= (DateTime)propertyTestedValue)
{
if (this.allowEqualDates)
{
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
if ((DateTime)value > (DateTime)propertyTestedValue)
{
return ValidationResult.Success;
}
}
return new ValidationResult(FormatErrorMessage(validationContext.DisplayName));
}
public IEnumerable<ModelClientValidationRule> GetClientValidationRules(ModelMetadata metadata, ControllerContext context)
{
var rule = new ModelClientValidationRule
{
ErrorMessage = this.ErrorMessageString,
ValidationType = "isdateafter"
};
rule.ValidationParameters["propertytested"] = this.testedPropertyName;
rule.ValidationParameters["allowequaldates"] = this.allowEqualDates;
yield return rule;
}
CalendarEntry类: ...
public virtual DateTime StartDate { get; set; }
[IsDateAfter("StartDate", true, ErrorMessage="End date needs to be after start date")]
public virtual DateTime EndDate { get; set; }
查看:
$.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.add(
'isdateafter', ['propertytested', 'allowequaldates'], function (options) {
options.rules['isdateafter'] = options.params;
options.messages['isdateafter'] = options.message;
});
$.validator.addMethod("isdateafter", function(value, element, params) {
alert(params.propertytested);
var startdatevalue = $('input[name="' + params.propertytested + '"]').val();
if (!value || !startdatevalue) return true;
return (params.allowequaldates) ? Date.parse(startdatevalue) <= Date.parse(value) : Date.parse(startdatevalue) < Date.parse(value);
}, '');
当 CalendarEntry 没有包装在另一个类中时,这可以正常工作。但是,当我使用这样的视图模型时:
public class TrainingDateEditViewModel
{
#region Properties
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets CalendarEntry.
/// </summary>
public CalendarEntry CalendarEntry { get; set; }
....
客户端验证不再有效,因为生成的html输出是:
<input type="text" value="" name="CalendarEntry.EndDate" id="CalendarEntry_EndDate" data-val-isdateafter-propertytested="StartDate" data-val-isdateafter-allowequaldates="True" data-val-isdateafter="End date needs to be after start date" data-val="true">
和
data-val-isdateafter-propertytested="StartDate" and IT SHOULD BE: "CalendarEntry.StartDate".
我如何制作它以便知道绑定到“CalendarEntry.StartDate” rule.ValidationParameters [“propertytested”] = this.testedPropertyName; //这里应该全名? HOW ??
感谢
答案 0 :(得分:31)
您需要修改客户端脚本以检查测试元素的前缀,并将前缀(如果有)添加到选择器,如下所示:
$.validator.addMethod("isdateafter", function(value, element, params) {
var parts = element.name.split(".");
var prefix = "";
if (parts.length > 1)
prefix = parts[0] + ".";
var startdatevalue = $('input[name="' + prefix + params.propertytested + '"]').val();
if (!value || !startdatevalue)
return true;
return (params.allowequaldates) ? Date.parse(startdatevalue) <= Date.parse(value) :
Date.parse(startdatevalue) < Date.parse(value);
});
答案 1 :(得分:4)
不要忘记在此代码中包含客户端。花了我几个小时才发现这个丢失了!
(function ($) {
// your code here..
})(jQuery);
答案 2 :(得分:1)
只是为了解决一下consllorben的javascript中的一个小错误:“(params.allowequaldates)”将被解释为一个字符串(其值为“False”或“True”),但该字符串将始终被评估为真,因此总是允许相等的日期。 如果您还希望允许更多级别的对象嵌套而不仅仅是1,那么您将得到:
$.validator.addMethod("isdateafter", function(value, element, params) {
var parts = element.name.split(".");
var prefix = "";
for (var i = 0; i < parts.length - 1; i++)
prefix = parts[i] + ".";
var startdatevalue = $('input[name="' + prefix + params.propertytested + '"]').val();
if (!value || !startdatevalue)
return true;
var allowequal = params.allowequaldates.toLowerCase === "true";
return allowequal ? Date.parse(startdatevalue) <= Date.parse(value) :
Date.parse(startdatevalue) < Date.parse(value);
});
答案 3 :(得分:0)
在最后一个答案中,对toLowerCase的调用有一些缺失的括号,这里是一个更新版本,文档就绪,$ .validator.unobtrusive ......-部分:
$(function () {
$.validator.addMethod("isdateafter", function(value, element, params) {
var parts = element.name.split(".");
var prefix = "";
for (var i = 0; i < parts.length - 1; i++) {
prefix = parts[i] + ".";
}
var startdatevalue = $('input[name="' + prefix + params.propertytested + '"]').val();
if (!value || !startdatevalue) return true;
var allowequal = params.allowequaldates.toLowerCase() === "true";
return allowequal ? Date.parse(startdatevalue) <= Date.parse(value) :
Date.parse(startdatevalue) < Date.parse(value);
});
$.validator.unobtrusive.adapters.add('isdateafter',
['propertytested', 'allowequaldates'],
function (options) {
options.rules['isdateafter'] = options.params;
options.messages['isdateafter'] = options.message;
});
});