我所追求的是一种配置线程池使用的兼容方式。理想情况下,其余代码不应受到影响。我可以使用一个线程池与1个线程,但这不是我想要的。有什么想法吗?
ExecutorService es = threads == 0 ? new CurrentThreadExecutor() : Executors.newThreadPoolExecutor(threads);
// es.execute / es.submit / new ExecutorCompletionService(es) etc
答案 0 :(得分:77)
如果您不需要ExecutorService
,则可以使用番石榴MoreExecutors.newDirectExecutorService()
或MoreExecutors.directExecutor()
。
如果包含番石榴太重,你可以实现几乎同样好的东西:
public final class SameThreadExecutorService extends ThreadPoolExecutor {
private final CountDownLatch signal = new CountDownLatch(1);
private SameThreadExecutorService() {
super(1, 1, 0, TimeUnit.DAYS, new SynchronousQueue<Runnable>(),
new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy());
}
@Override public void shutdown() {
super.shutdown();
signal.countDown();
}
public static ExecutorService getInstance() {
return SingletonHolder.instance;
}
private static class SingletonHolder {
static ExecutorService instance = createInstance();
}
private static ExecutorService createInstance() {
final SameThreadExecutorService instance
= new SameThreadExecutorService();
// The executor has one worker thread. Give it a Runnable that waits
// until the executor service is shut down.
// All other submitted tasks will use the RejectedExecutionHandler
// which runs tasks using the caller's thread.
instance.submit(new Runnable() {
@Override public void run() {
boolean interrupted = false;
try {
while (true) {
try {
instance.signal.await();
break;
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
interrupted = true;
}
}
} finally {
if (interrupted) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
}
}});
return Executors.unconfigurableScheduledExecutorService(instance);
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:57)
这是一个非常简单的Executor
(不是ExecutorService
,请注意)实现,它只使用当前线程。从“Java Concurrency in Practice”(基本阅读)中窃取这一点。
public class CurrentThreadExecutor implements Executor {
public void execute(Runnable r) {
r.run();
}
}
ExecutorService
是一个更复杂的界面,但可以使用相同的方法处理。
答案 2 :(得分:47)
Java 8风格:
Executor e = Runnable::run;
答案 3 :(得分:12)
我根据ExecutorService
撰写了AbstractExecutorService
。
/**
* Executes all submitted tasks directly in the same thread as the caller.
*/
public class SameThreadExecutorService extends AbstractExecutorService {
//volatile because can be viewed by other threads
private volatile boolean terminated;
@Override
public void shutdown() {
terminated = true;
}
@Override
public boolean isShutdown() {
return terminated;
}
@Override
public boolean isTerminated() {
return terminated;
}
@Override
public boolean awaitTermination(long theTimeout, TimeUnit theUnit) throws InterruptedException {
shutdown(); // TODO ok to call shutdown? what if the client never called shutdown???
return terminated;
}
@Override
public List<Runnable> shutdownNow() {
return Collections.emptyList();
}
@Override
public void execute(Runnable theCommand) {
theCommand.run();
}
}
答案 4 :(得分:5)
您可以使用RejectedExecutionHandler在当前线程中运行任务。
public static final ThreadPoolExecutor CURRENT_THREAD_EXECUTOR = new ThreadPoolExecutor(0, 0, 0, TimeUnit.DAYS, new SynchronousQueue<Runnable>(), new RejectedExecutionHandler() {
public void rejectedExecution(Runnable r, ThreadPoolExecutor executor) {
r.run();
}
});
你只需要其中一个。
答案 5 :(得分:4)
我必须使用相同的&#34; CurrentThreadExecutorService&#34;出于测试目的,虽然所有建议的解决方案都很好(特别是提到the Guava way),但我提出了类似于Peter Lawrey建议here的内容。
正如Axelle Ziegler here所提到的,不幸的是,由于在ThreadPoolExecutor
构造函数参数maximumPoolSize
中引入的检查,彼得的解决方案实际上无法正常工作(即maximumPoolSize
无法<=0
)。
为了规避这一点,我做了以下事情:
private static ExecutorService currentThreadExecutorService() {
CallerRunsPolicy callerRunsPolicy = new ThreadPoolExecutor.CallerRunsPolicy();
return new ThreadPoolExecutor(0, 1, 0L, TimeUnit.SECONDS, new SynchronousQueue<Runnable>(), callerRunsPolicy) {
@Override
public void execute(Runnable command) {
callerRunsPolicy.rejectedExecution(command, this);
}
};
}