在下面的代码中,我想同步报告任务列表的结果。这现在正在工作,因为task.Result会阻塞,直到任务完成。但是,task id = 3需要很长时间才能完成,并阻止所有其他已完成的任务报告其状态。
我认为我可以通过将报告(Console.Write)移动到.ContinueWith指令来完成此操作,但我没有UI线程,那么如何让TaskScheduler同步.ContinueWith任务呢?
我现在拥有的:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("Starting on {0}", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
var tasks = new List<Task<int>>();
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
var num = i;
var t = Task<int>.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
if (num == 3)
{
Thread.Sleep(20000);
}
Thread.Sleep(new Random(num).Next(1000, 5000));
Console.WriteLine("Done {0} on {1}", num, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
return num;
});
tasks.Add(t);
}
foreach (var task in tasks)
{
Console.WriteLine("Completed {0} on {1}", task.Result, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
}
Console.WriteLine("End of Main");
Console.ReadKey();
}
我想转到这个或类似的东西,但我需要Console.Write(“Completed ...”)才能在同一个线程上发生:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("Starting on {0}", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
var num = i;
Task<int>.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
if (num == 3)
{
Thread.Sleep(20000);
}
Thread.Sleep(new Random(num).Next(1000, 10000));
Console.WriteLine("Done {0} on {1}", num, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
return num;
}).ContinueWith(value =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Completed {0} on {1}", value.Result, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
}
/* need syncronization context */);
}
Console.WriteLine("End of Main");
Console.ReadKey();
}
- 解决方案 - 在得到一些评论并阅读一些解决方案之后,这就是我想要的完整解决方案。这里的目标是尽可能快地处理长时间运行的任务,然后逐个处理每个任务的结果。
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine("Starting on {0}", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
var results = new BlockingCollection<int>();
Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
while (!results.IsCompleted)
{
try
{
var x = results.Take();
Console.WriteLine("Completed {0} on {1}", x, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
}
catch (InvalidOperationException)
{
}
}
Console.WriteLine("\r\nNo more items to take.");
});
var tasks = new List<Task>();
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
var num = i;
var t = Task.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
if (num == 3)
{
Thread.Sleep(20000);
}
Thread.Sleep(new Random(num).Next(1000, 10000));
Console.WriteLine("Done {0} on {1}", num, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
results.Add(num);
});
tasks.Add(t);
}
Task.Factory.ContinueWhenAll(tasks.ToArray(), _ => results.CompleteAdding());
Console.WriteLine("End of Main");
Console.ReadKey();
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您必须创建某种类型的编写器任务,但请记住,即使此任务可以重新安排到另一个本机或托管线程上!使用TPL中的默认调度程序,您无法控制哪个托管线程接收工作。
public class ConcurrentConsole
{
private static BlockingCollection<string> output
= new BlockingCollection<string>();
public static Task CreateWriterTask(CancellationToken token)
{
return new Task(
() =>
{
while (!token.IsCancellationRequested)
{
string nextLine = output.Take(token);
Console.WriteLine(nextLine);
}
},
token);
}
public static void WriteLine(Func<string> writeLine)
{
output.Add(writeLine());
}
}
当我切换你的代码使用它时,我收到了以下输出:
End of Main
Done 1 on 6
Completed 1 on 6
Done 5 on 9
Completed 5 on 9
Done 0 on 4
Completed 0 on 4
Done 2 on 5
Completed 2 on 13
Done 7 on 10
Completed 7 on 10
Done 4 on 8
Completed 4 on 5
Done 9 on 12
Completed 9 on 9
Done 6 on 6
Completed 6 on 5
Done 8 on 11
Completed 8 on 4
Done 3 on 7
Completed 3 on 7
即使您的代码向() => String.Format("Completed {0} on {1}"...
发送ConcurrentConsole.WriteLine
,确保在ManagedThreadId
任务中选择ConcurrentConsole
,它仍会改变其运行的线程。虽然可变性比执行任务少。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
您可以使用OrderedTaskScheduler
确保一次只运行一个任务;但是,它们将在线程池线程上运行(不一定都在同一个线程上)。
如果你真的需要在同一个帖子上(不是一次只有一个),那么你可以使用Nito.Async library中的ActionThread
。它为其代码提供了SynchronizationContext
,可以通过FromCurrentSynchronizationContext
获取。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我建议:
1)创建锁定对象
2)创建要写入的字符串列表
3)生成一个循环,稍微休眠的线程,然后锁定字符串列表,然后如果它不为空,则写入所有这些并清空列表
4)然后其他线程锁定列表,添加其状态,解锁并继续。
object writeListLocker = new object();
List<string> linesToWrite = new List<string>();
// Main thread loop
for (; ; )
{
lock (writerListLocker)
{
foreach (string nextLine in linesToWrite)
Console.WriteLine(nextLine);
linesToWrite.Clear();
}
Thread.Sleep(500);
}
// Reporting threads
lock (writerListLocker)
{
linesToWrite.Add("Completed (etc.)");
}
答案 3 :(得分:0)
我认为您期望得到如下结果。
Starting on 8
Done 1 on 11
Completed 1 on 9
Done 5 on 11
Completed 5 on 9
Done 0 on 10
Completed 0 on 9
Done 2 on 12
Completed 2 on 9
Done 7 on 16
Completed 7 on 9
Done 4 on 14
Completed 4 on 9
Done 9 on 18
Completed 9 on 9
Done 6 on 15
Completed 6 on 9
Done 8 on 17
Completed 8 on 9
Done 3 on 13
Completed 3 on 9
如下所示,我在the Understanding SynchronizationContext的代码中使用了StaSynchronizationContext
,其中解释了一个线程中的同步调用。请参考它。
我的代码段是:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
StaSynchronizationContext context = new StaSynchronizationContext();
StaSynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(context);
Console.WriteLine("Starting on {0}", Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
var num = i;
Task<int>.Factory.StartNew(() =>
{
if (num == 3)
{
Thread.Sleep(20000);
}
Thread.Sleep(new Random(num).Next(1000, 10000));
Console.WriteLine("Done {0} on {1}", num, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
return num;
}).ContinueWith(
value =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Completed {0} on {1}", value.Result, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
}
,TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext());
}
Console.WriteLine("End of Main");
Console.ReadKey();
}