以下代码段:
import traceback
def a():
b()
def b():
try:
c()
except:
traceback.print_exc()
def c():
assert False
a()
生成此输出:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test.py", line 8, in b
c()
File "test.py", line 13, in c
assert False
AssertionError
如果我想要完整的堆栈跟踪,包括对?
的调用,我该怎么用?如果重要的话我有Python 2.6.6
编辑:我想得到的是,如果我离开尝试除外,我将获得的信息相同,并将异常传播到顶层。这个代码段例如:
def a():
b()
def b():
c()
def c():
assert False
a()
生成此输出:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test.py", line 10, in <module>
a()
File "test.py", line 2, in a
b()
File "test.py", line 5, in b
c()
File "test.py", line 8, in c
assert False
AssertionError
答案 0 :(得分:21)
这是基于this answer的功能。当没有例外时它也会起作用:
def full_stack():
import traceback, sys
exc = sys.exc_info()[0]
stack = traceback.extract_stack()[:-1] # last one would be full_stack()
if exc is not None: # i.e. an exception is present
del stack[-1] # remove call of full_stack, the printed exception
# will contain the caught exception caller instead
trc = 'Traceback (most recent call last):\n'
stackstr = trc + ''.join(traceback.format_list(stack))
if exc is not None:
stackstr += ' ' + traceback.format_exc().lstrip(trc)
return stackstr
print full_stack()
会将完整的堆栈跟踪打印到顶部,包括例如IPython的interactiveshell.py
调用,因为(据我所知)无法知道谁会捕获异常。无论如何,这可能都不值得......
如果从print full_stack()
块中调用except
,则full_stack
会将堆栈跟踪包含到raise
。在标准Python解释器中,这与未捕获异常时收到的消息相同(这就是del stack[-1]
存在的原因,您不关心except
块而是关于{ {1}}阻止)。
答案 1 :(得分:20)
我不知道是否有更好的方法,但这就是我所做的:
import traceback
import sys
def format_exception(e):
exception_list = traceback.format_stack()
exception_list = exception_list[:-2]
exception_list.extend(traceback.format_tb(sys.exc_info()[2]))
exception_list.extend(traceback.format_exception_only(sys.exc_info()[0], sys.exc_info()[1]))
exception_str = "Traceback (most recent call last):\n"
exception_str += "".join(exception_list)
# Removing the last \n
exception_str = exception_str[:-1]
return exception_str
def main1():
main2()
def main2():
try:
main3()
except Exception as e:
print "Printing only the traceback above the current stack frame"
print "".join(traceback.format_exception(sys.exc_info()[0], sys.exc_info()[1], sys.exc_info()[2]))
print
print "Printing the full traceback as if we had not caught it here..."
print format_exception(e)
def main3():
raise Exception()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main1()
这是我得到的输出:
Printing only the traceback above the current stack frame
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "exc.py", line 22, in main2
main3()
File "exc.py", line 31, in main3
raise Exception()
Exception
Printing the full traceback as if we had not caught it here...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "exc.py", line 34, in <module>
main1()
File "exc.py", line 18, in main1
main2()
File "exc.py", line 22, in main2
main3()
File "exc.py", line 31, in main3
raise Exception()
Exception
答案 2 :(得分:7)
使用
traceback.print_stack()
http://docs.python.org/library/traceback.html#traceback.print_stack
suxmac2 $ python out.py File "out.py", line 16, in <module> a() File "out.py", line 5, in a b() File "out.py", line 11, in b traceback.print_stack()
答案 3 :(得分:2)
这是Tobias Kienzler answer的一个更好的变体。它的工作方式相同,但可以在except
块中调用,但在某个更深处。
换句话说,当调用
try:
...
except Exception:
print full_stack()
或
def print_full_stack():
print full_stack()
try:
...
except Exception:
print_full_stack()
这是代码:
def full_stack():
import traceback, sys
exc = sys.exc_info()[0]
if exc is not None:
f = sys.exc_info()[-1].tb_frame.f_back
stack = traceback.extract_stack(f)
else:
stack = traceback.extract_stack()[:-1] # last one would be full_stack()
trc = 'Traceback (most recent call last):\n'
stackstr = trc + ''.join(traceback.format_list(stack))
if exc is not None:
stackstr += ' ' + traceback.format_exc().lstrip(trc)
return stackstr