我为循环缓冲区编写了一个模板类:
template <class T> class CRingBuffer { /* ... */ };
此类执行的某些操作依赖于对T
大小的准确评估。当T
为BYTE
时(sizeof(T) == 1
,检查),这似乎没问题。但是,当我尝试使用T
为DWORD
的同一个类时,由于某种原因,sizeof(T)
的计算结果为16.我最后一次检查时,双字是4个字节,而不是16.有谁知道为什么会这样?感谢。
附加信息
由于其专有性质,我无法发布所有代码,但这里是类声明和函数定义:
template <class T> class CRingBuffer
{
#pragma pack( push , 1 ) // align on a 1-byte boundary
typedef struct BUFFER_FLAGS_tag
{
T * pHead; // Points to next buffer location to write
T * pTail; // Points to next buffer location to read
BOOL blFull; // Indicates whether buffer is full.
BOOL blEmpty; // Indicates whether buffer is empty.
BOOL blOverrun; // Indicates buffer overrun.
BOOL blUnderrun; // Indicates buffer underrun.
DWORD dwItemCount; // Buffer item count.
} BUFFER_FLAGS, *LPBUFFER_FLAGS;
#pragma pack( pop ) // end 1-byte boundary alignment
// Private member variable declarations
private:
T * m_pBuffer; // Buffer location in system memory
T * m_pStart; // Buffer start location in system memory
T * m_pEnd; // Buffer end location in system memory
BUFFER_FLAGS m_tFlags; // Buffer flags.
DWORD m_dwCapacity; // The buffer capacity.
// CRingBuffer
public:
CRingBuffer( DWORD items = DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE );
~CRingBuffer();
// Public member function declarations
public:
DWORD Add( T * pItems, DWORD num = 1, LPDWORD pAdded = NULL );
DWORD Peek( T * pBuf, DWORD num = -1, DWORD offset = 0, LPDWORD pWritten = NULL );
DWORD Delete( DWORD num, LPDWORD pDeleted = NULL );
DWORD Remove( T * pBuf, DWORD num = 1, LPDWORD pRemoved = NULL );
void Flush( void );
DWORD GetItemCount( void );
BYTE GetErrorStatus( void );
// Private member function declarations
private:
void IncrementHead( LPBUFFER_FLAGS pFlags = NULL );
void IncrementTail( LPBUFFER_FLAGS pFlags = NULL );
};
template <class T> void CRingBuffer<T>::IncrementHead( LPBUFFER_FLAGS pFlags )
{
ASSERT(this->m_pBuffer != NULL);
ASSERT(this->m_pStart != NULL);
ASSERT(this->m_pEnd != NULL);
ASSERT(this->m_tFlags.pHead != NULL);
ASSERT(this->m_tFlags.pTail != NULL);
pFlags = ( pFlags == NULL ) ? &(this->m_tFlags) : pFlags;
// Verify overrun condition is not set.
if ( pFlags->blOverrun == FALSE )
{
pFlags->pHead += sizeof(T); // increament buffer head pointer
pFlags->blUnderrun = FALSE; // clear underrun condition
// Correct for wrap condition.
if ( pFlags->pHead == this->m_pEnd )
{
pFlags->pHead = this->m_pStart;
}
// Check for overrun.
if ( pFlags->pHead == pFlags->pTail )
{
pFlags->blOverrun = TRUE;
}
}
}
执行pFlags->pHead += sizeof(T);
IncrementHead
时会出现上述问题。
答案 0 :(得分:3)
哦,毕竟这很简单:)
在没有意识到的情况下,在pFlags->pHead += sizeof(T);
中使用指针算法。 pHead
是指向T
的指针,当您按sizeof(T)
增加时,表示您将T
类型的多个元素向前移动,而不是那么多你想到的字节数。所以T
的大小变得平方。如果你的目标是将指针移动到缓冲区的下一个元素,你应该只增加1:pFlags->pHead += 1;