如何使用反射来获取泛型类型的扩展方法

时间:2011-05-11 04:21:44

标签: c# generics reflection extension-methods

从各种来源的网上我已经收集了以下这个功能:

public static Nullable<T> TryParseNullable<T>(this Nullable<T> t, string input) where T : struct
{
    if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(input))
        return default(T);

    Nullable<T> result = new Nullable<T>();
    try
    {
        IConvertible convertibleString = (IConvertible)input;
        result = new Nullable<T>((T)convertibleString.ToType(typeof(T), CultureInfo.CurrentCulture));
    }
    catch (InvalidCastException) { }
    catch (FormatException) { }

    return result;
}

我已经把它变成了一个扩展方法,如果我直接调用它就可以正常工作:

int? input = new int?().TryParseNullable("12345");

当我尝试使用另一个泛型函数的上下文中的反射来调用它时,会出现问题。 SO充满了描述如何获得泛型方法和静态方法的MethodInfo的答案,但我似乎无法以正确的方式将它们组合在一起。
我已经正确地确定传递的泛型类型本身是泛型类型(Nullable<>),现在我想使用反射来调用TryParseNullable上的Nullable<>扩展方法:

public static T GetValue<T>(string name, T defaultValue)
{
    string result = getSomeStringValue(name);
    if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(result)) return defaultValue;

    try
    {
        if (typeof(T).IsGenericType && typeof(T).GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(Nullable<>))
        {
            MethodInfo methodInfo;

            //using the TryParse() of the underlying type works but isn't exactly the way i want to do it
            //------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
            NullableConverter nc = new NullableConverter(typeof(T));
            Type t = nc.UnderlyingType;

            methodInfo = t.GetMethod("TryParse", BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static, Type.DefaultBinder, new[] { typeof(string), t.MakeByRefType() }, null);
            if (methodInfo != null)
            {
                var inputParameters = new object[] { result, null };
                methodInfo.Invoke(null, inputParameters);
                return (T) inputParameters[1];
            }

            //start of the problem area
            //-------------------------

            Type ttype = typeof(T);

            //this works but is undesirable (due to reference to class containing the static method):
            methodInfo = typeof(ParentExtensionsClass).GetMethod("TryParseNullable", BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static);
            if (methodInfo != null)
                Console.WriteLine(methodInfo);

            //standard way of getting static method, doesn't work (GetMethod() returns null):
            methodInfo = ttype.GetMethod("TryParseNullable", BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static);
            if (methodInfo != null)
                Console.WriteLine(methodInfo);

            //Jon Skeet's advised method, doesn't work in this case (again GetMethod() returns null):
            //(see footnote for link to this answer)
            methodInfo = ttype.GetMethod("TryParseNullable");
            methodInfo = methodInfo.MakeGenericMethod(ttype);
            if (methodInfo != null)
                Console.WriteLine(methodInfo);

            //another random attempt (also doesn't work):
            methodInfo = ttype.GetMethod("TryParseNullable", BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static, Type.DefaultBinder, new[] { typeof(string) }, null);
            if (methodInfo != null)
                Console.WriteLine(methodInfo);
        }

        // if we get this far, then we are not handling the type yet
        throw new ArgumentException("The type " + defaultValue.GetType() + " is not yet supported by GetValue<T>.", "T");
    }
    catch (Exception e)
    {
        [snip]
    }
}

有人能让我摆脱苦难吗? typeof(T)返回正确的类型信息,我想可能我在GetMethod()调用时使用它有点不正确,或者我没有通过调用{{1}指定正确的参数}。

<子> 1。 Link to referenced Jon Skeet answer

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:7)

问题是扩展方法不会修改它们“扩展”的类型。幕后实际发生的是编译器透明地将所有对相关对象进行的调用转换为对静态方法的调用。

int? input = new int?().TryParseNullable("12345");
// becomes...
int? input = YourClass.TryParseNullable(new int?(), "12345");

从那里可以明显看出为什么它没有通过反射出现。这也解释了为什么必须为命名空间设置using指令,其中YourClass被定义为扩展方法对编译器可见。至于如何实际获取该信息,我不确定是否有办法,没有运行所有声明的类型(如果你在编译时知道那些类型的信息,可能是一个有趣的类的过滤列表)对于定义了ExtensionMethodAttribute[ExtensionMethod])的静态方法,然后尝试解析参数列表的MethodInfo,以确定它们是否适用于Nullable<>